Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:14:47.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavating the “Who” and “Why” of Participation in a Public Archaeology Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Stefanie Kowalczyk
Stefanie Kowalczyk*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, 395 Humphrey Center 301, 19th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55455, ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Swede Hollow Park, in St. Paul, Minnesota, was originally inhabited by immigrants to St. Paul. Despite an engaged surrounding neighborhood, the park and its history are not widely known. The park was recently the site of a public archaeology project, providing an opportunity to explicitly examine who participated and why, as a means of assessing the success of public education. The project team used surveys and informal interviews as assessment tools for analyzing the demographics and motivations of the participating public. Understanding demographics and motivations is an understudied aspect of public archaeology and yet is crucially important in influencing how archaeologists interact with the public, frame their research questions, and create learning objectives. This information has the potential to help create more inclusive public archaeology projects (for example, drawing in more recent immigrant communities as well as descendants) and to indicate where more work needs to be done to accommodate diversity (in our case, understanding the homeless as stakeholders). It also can help clarify whether archaeologists can, or should, prioritize site, method, or narrative when engaging with the public, or whether the public should choose.

Resumen

Resumen

Originalmente Swede Hollow Park fue habitado por los inmigrantes del área de St. Paul, Minnesota. A pesar que la comunidad tiene conocimiento del parque, su historia no es suficientemente conocida en la ciudad. Recientemente, el parque fue el sitio de un proyecto de arqueología pública para investigar temas relacionados con la inmigración y la pobreza. Se dio la oportunidad para explorar explícitamente quienes participaron y por qué, en vez de solamente incluir el objetivo de entregar con éxito la información. Se invitó a los participantes a contribuir en las excavaciones y se les pidió llenar una encuesta y/o participar en una entrevista informal. Se utilizaron encuestas de opción múltiple para evaluar lo que los participantes habían aprendido acerca de la arqueología y/o la historia del parque y por qué ellos habían participado. Se utilizaron las entrevistas para comprender más profundamente por qué la gente había elegido participar. Los resultados indican que la mayoría de las personas participaron por las mismas razones: muchos sintieron que era importante aprender sobre la historia de la inmigración, mientras que otros buscaron aprender más acerca de la arqueología o la historia del barrio. Aplicar esta información para otros proyectos de arqueología pública puede ayudar a aclarar si los arqueólogos pueden, o deben, dar prioridad al sitio, al método o a la narrativa al hacer participar al público, o si el público debe elegir.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 4 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Designing and Assessing Public Education Programs in Archaeology , November 2016 , pp. 454 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bollwerk, Elizabeth, Connolly, Robert, and McDavid, Carol 2015. Co-Creation and Public Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice. 3(3):178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brueggemann, Gary J. 1985. A Peoples History Calendar of East St Paul. St. Paul Community Education, Independent School District 625.Google Scholar
Brueggemann, Gary J. 2013. Minnesota’s Oldest Murder Mystery: The Case of Edward Phalen: St. Paul’s Unsaintly Pioneer. Beaver Pond Press, Edina, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Cameron, Catherine M. 2000. Emergent Industrial History: The Politics of Selection. Museum Anthropology. 23(3):58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Catherine M., and Gatewood, John 2000. Excursions into the Unremembered Past: What People Want from Visits to Historical Sites. Public Historian. 22(3):107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Neil 2000. Archaeology from Below. Public Archaeology. 1(1):21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friends of Swede Hollow 2015. Friends of Swede Hollow: About Us. Electronic document, http://www.swedehollow.org/About_Us.html, accessed January 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M., and Plog, Fred T. 1970. The Nature of Archaeological Explanation. American Antiquity. 35(4 ):405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtorf, Cornelius 2007. Archaeology Is a Brand! The Meaning of Archaeology in Contemporary Popular Culture. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kiddey, Rachael, and Schofield, John 2011. Embrace the Margins: Adventures in Archaeology and Homelessness. Public Archaeology. 10(1):4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanegran, David A. 2001. Swedish Neighborhoods of the Twin Cities: From Swede Hollow to Arlington Hills, from Snooze Boulevard to Minnehaha Parkway. In Swedes in the Twin Cities: Immigrant Life and Minnesota’s Urban Frontier, edited by Anderson, Philip J. and Blanck, Dag, pp. 39–56. Minnesota Historical Society Press, St Paul.Google Scholar
Little, Barbara J. 2002. Archaeology as a Shared Vision. In Public Benefits of Archaeology, edited by Little, Barbara J., pp.3–19. University Press of Florida, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
McDavid, Caroline 1999. From “Traditional” Archaeology to Public Archaeology to Community Action. In Places in Mind: Public Archaeology as Applied Anthropology, edited by Shackel, Paul and Chambers, Erve, pp. 35–56. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
McManamon, Frances P 2000. Archaeological Messages and Messengers. Public Archaeology. 1(1):5–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Yvonne 2002. What Is Community Archaeology?. World Archaeology. 34(2):211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriman, Nick 2000. The Crisis of Representation in Archaeological Museums. In Cultural Resource Management in Contemporary Society, edited by McManamon, Francis P and Hatton, Alf, pp. 300–309. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Merriman, Nick 2002. Archaeology, Heritage, and Interpretation. In Archaeology: The Widening Debate, edited by Cunliffe, Barry, Davies, Wendy, and Renfrew, Colin, pp. 245–259. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Merriman, Nick 2004. Diversity and Dissonance in Public Archaeology. In Public Archaeology, edited by Merriman, Nick, pp.1–17. Routledge, New York. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, Lynn 2002. Negative Heritage and Past Mastering in Archaeology. Anthropological Quarterly. 75(3):557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metropolitan Council 2014. Section Five: Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty in the Region. In Choice, Place, and Opportunity: An Equity Assessment of the Twin Cities Region. Submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Copies available from the Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Moser, Stephanie, Darren, Galzier, Phillips, James E., el Nemr, Lamya Nasser, Mousa, Mohammed Saleh, Aiesh, Rascha Nasr, Richardson, Susan, Connor, Andrew, and Seymour, Michael 2002. Transforming Archaeology Through Practice: Strategies for Collaborative Archaeology and the Community Archaeology Project at Quseir, Egypt. Community Archaeology. 34(2):220–248.Google Scholar
Potter, Parker B. 1994. Public Archaeology in Annapolis: A Critical Approach to History in Maryland’s Ancient City. Smithsonian Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Price, Mollie 1982. Swede Hollow: Sheltered Society for Immigrants to St. Paul. Ramsey County History. 17(2):12–22.Google Scholar
Pyburn, Anne K. 2011. Engaged Archaeology: Whose Community? Which Public?. In New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology, edited by Matsuda, Akira and Okamura, Katsuyuki, pp. 29–41. Spring, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, Maria, and Duganne, David 2000. Exploring Public Perceptions and Attitudes about Archaeology. Prepared by Harris Interactive for the Society for American Archaeology Washington, D.C. Electronic document, http://www.saa.org/publicftp/ public/resources/pubpercp.html, accessed November 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Rice, John G. 1981. The Swedes. In They Chose Minnesota: A Survey of the State’s Ethnic Groups, edited by Drenning, June Holmquist, pp. 248–276. Minnesota Historical Society Press, St. Paul. Google Scholar
Richardson, Lorna-Jane, and Almansa-Sánchez, Jaime 2015. Do You Even Know What Public Archaeology Is?. World Archaeology. 47(2):194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schadla-Hall, Tim 1999. Editorial: Public Archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology. 2(2):147–158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scham, Sandra 2010. Colonialism, Conflict, and Connectivity: Public Archaeology’s Message in a Bottle. In Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology, edited by Lydon, Jane and Rizvi, Uzma, pp. 459–169. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Shively, Emily 2010. Unique Sense of Place: Hamms Brewery and Swede Hollow Park, St. Paul, Minnesota. Unpublished Masters thesis, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Society for American Archaeology (SAA) 2008. What Is Public Archaeology? Electronic document, http://www.saa.org/publicftp/public/forArchaeologists/forArchaeologists.html, accessed November 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Society for American Archaeology (SAA) 2014. MA Theses and Ph.D. Dissertations on Public Archaeology Related Fields, Electronic document, http://www.saa.org/publicftp/public/resources/MAPHDbibliography.html, accessed November 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig 2009. Between the Lines and in the Margins: Interviewing People about Attitudes Toward Heritage and Identity. In Heritage Studies: Methods and Approaches, edited by Carmen, John and Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig, pp. 164–177. Routledge: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, Cathy 2006. The Lowell Experiment: Public History in a Postindustrial City. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.Google Scholar
Waterton, Emma, and Larajane, Smith 2010. The Recognition and Misrecognition of Community Heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16(1-2):4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Larry J., Singleton, Courtney, and Welch, Jessica 2010. Activism and Creating a Translational Archaeology of Homelessness. World Archaeology. 42(3):443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar