Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:58:36.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Resources Priority Area Planning in Sub-Mogollon Arizona and New Mexico1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Andy Laurenzi ,
Matthew A. Peeples  and
William H. Doelle
Andy Laurenzi
Affiliation:
Archaeology Southwest, 300 North Ash Alley, Tucson, AZ 85701
Matthew A. Peeples
Affiliation:
Archaeology Southwest, 300 North Ash Alley, Tucson, AZ 85701
William H. Doelle
Affiliation:
Archaeology Southwest, 300 North Ash Alley, Tucson, AZ 85701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Regional planning is an essential element of comprehensive archaeological management programs. Most regional planning efforts in archaeology focus on predictive modeling to distinguish areas based on the likelihood of encountering archaeological resources. We discuss a complementary approach that uses known sites and expert opinion to identify spatially explicit cultural resource preservation priorities. Loosely analogous to biodiversity conservation planning, priority cultural resource assessments provide an evolving vision of an archaeological reserve network which, if managed appropriately, could protect a significant part of our cultural heritage. We outline an efficient approach to identifying spatially explicit Priority Areas within portions of Arizona and New Mexico. This information complements assessments of individual site eligibility for purposes of listing on the National Register of Historic Places by providing an added layer of regionally contextualized information at larger geographic scales. By establishing priorities, this information can also enhance cultural resource considerations in local, state, and federal land use planning. While our consideration of significance is based on the potential information content of the resource, we argue that this planning process can easily incorporate other cultural resource values and help to address preservation actions in support of this broader set of values.

La planeación regional es un elemento esencial de cualquier programa de manejo integral de sitios arqueológicos. Hasta ahora, la mayor parte de los esfuerzos en torno a la planeación regional en la arqueología han utilizado el modelo predictivo para distinguir áreas potenciales con recursos arqueológicos. Aunque no precisamente análoga a la conservación de la biodiversidad, la prioridad de los recursos culturales durante la planeación es similar al establecimiento de una red de reservas arqueológicas en constante evolución, que de ser manejadas apropiadamente, podrían proteger una parte significativa de nuestro patrimonio cultural por generaciones. Nosotros esbozamos un método directo y de bajo costo para identificar áreas prioritarias, espacialmente explícitas, en una gran parte del sureste de Arizona y el suroeste de Nuevo México. Inicialmente destinado como una herramienta de manejo para guiar los esfuerzos privados y públicos de protección de los recursos, la información generada tiene una aplicación más amplia. En lo particular, la planeación prioritaria va más allá de las evaluaciones de elegibilidad y del significado individual del sitio con el propósito de enlistarlo en el Registro Nacional de Lugares Históricos, al proporcionar una capa adicional de información regional contextualizada para escalas geográficas más grandes. Nosotros argumentamos que dicho proceso de planeación puede ayudarnos a abordar con mayor eficacia un rango más amplio de valores de los recursos culturales y afrontar las oportunidades de preservación.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , November 2013 , pp. 61 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

Sub-Mogollon Arizona includes those portions of Arizona and New Mexico that lie south of the Mogollon Rim, an escarpment defining the southern edge of the Colorado Plateau.

References

References Cited

Bandarin, Francesco (editor) 2007 World Heritage: Challenges for the Millennium. UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris.Google Scholar
Barker, Pat 2009 The Process Made Me Do It. In Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management: Visions for the Future, edited by Sebastian, Lynne and Lipe, William D., pp. 65–90. School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Blake, Michael, LeBlanc, Steven A., and Minnis, Paul E. 1986 Changes in Settlement and Population in the Mimbres Valley, SW New Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 15(4):439–464.Google Scholar
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 2013 Sun Zia Southwest Transmission Project. Electronic document, http://www.blm.gov/nm/st/en/prog/more/lands_realty/sunzia_southwest_transmission.html, accessed August 10, 2013.Google Scholar
Chapman, Richard C., Gossett, William, and Cossett, Cye 1985 Class II Cultural Resources Survey of the Upper Gila Water Supply Study Area. Report on File, Bureau of Reclamation, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Clark, Jeffery J., Huntley, Deborah L., Brett Hill, J., and Lyons, Patrick D. 2012 The Kayenta Diaspora and Salado Meta-Identity in the Late Pre-Contact U.S. Southwest. In Hybrid Material Culture: The Archaeology of Syncretism and Ethnogenesis, edited by Card, Jeb J., pp. 399–424. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Crown, Patricia L. 1994 Ceramics and Ideology: Salado Polychrome Pottery. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Cushman, David. 2002 Priority Cultural Resources in Pima County: The Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. Report on file, Pima County, Tucson.Google Scholar
Department of Interior (DOI), National Park Service. 1985 Land Protection Plan, Chaco Culture National Historical Park, New Mexico. Report on file, National Park Service Denver Service Center, Denver.Google Scholar
Department of Interior (DOI), National Park Service. 1989 Special Resources Study Mimbres Culture, Draft Report. Report on file, National Park Service Denver Service Center, DenverGoogle Scholar
Doelle, William H. 1995 Tonto Basin Demography in a Regional Perspective. In The Roosevelt Community Development Study: New Perspectives on Tonto Basin Prehistory, edited by Elson, Mark D., Stark, Miriam T. and Gregory, David A., pp. 201–226. Anthropological Research Papers No. 15. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Doelle, William H. 2000 Tonto Basin Demography in a Regional Perspective. In Salado, edited by Dean, Jeffrey S., pp. 81–105. Amerind Foundation, Dragoon, Arizona and University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Elia, Ricardo J. 1997 Looting, Collecting, and the Destruction of Archaeological Resources. Nonrenewable Resources 6(2):85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Suzanne K., Fish, Paul R., and Madsen, John H. 1993 The Northern Tucson Basin Survey: Research Directions and Background Studies. Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series No. 182. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Fitting, James E. 1972 Preliminary Notes on Cliff Valley Settlement Patterns. The Artifact 10(4):15–30.Google Scholar
Game, Edward T., Kareiva, Peter, and Grossman, Hugh P. 2013 Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting. Conservation Biology 27(3):480–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haury, Emil W., Sayles, E. B., and Wasley, William W. 1959 The Lehner Mammoth Site, Southeastern Arizona, American Antiquity 25(1):2–20.Google Scholar
Haynes, C. Vance Jr., and Huckell, Bruce B. (editors) 2007 Murray Springs: A Clovis Site with Multiple Activity Areas in the San Pedro Valley, Arizona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Haynes, C. Vance Jr. 2008 Younger Dryas “Black Mats” and the Rancholabrean Termination in North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(18):6520–6525.Google Scholar
Hegmon, Michelle, Peeples, Matthew A., Kinzig, Ann, Kulow, Stephanie, Meegan, Cathryn M., and Nelson, Margaret C.. 2008 Social Transformation and Its Human Costs in the Prehispanic U.S. Southwest. American Anthropologist 110(3):313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewett, Edgar L. 1905 A General View of the Archaeology of the Pueblo Region. In Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution, 1904, pp. 588–605. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Hewitt, Jame M., and Johnson, David S.. 1979 Tortolita Mountains Archaeological Project: Field Report 1978. Report on file, Pima Community College, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Hill, J. Brett, Clark, Jeffery J., Doelle, William H. and Lyons, Patrick D. 2004 Prehistoric Demography in the Southwest: Migration, Coalescence, and Hohokam Population Decline. American Antiquity 69(4):689–716.Google Scholar
Hill, J. Brett, Devitt, Mathew, and Sergeyeva, Marina 2009 Understanding Past and Future Land Use: Modeling Archaeological Sensitivity. In GIS Best Practices: GIS for Archaeology, edited by Rusli, N., pp. 39–46, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI).Google Scholar
Hill, J. Brett, Wilcox, David R., Doelle, William H., and Robinson, William J. 2012 Coalescent Communities GIS Database Version 2.0: Archaeology Southwest and Museum of Northern Arizona. Archaeology Southwest, Tucson.Google Scholar
Ingbar, Eric, Sebastian, Lynne, Altschul, Jeffrey, Hopkins, Mary, Eckerle, William, Robinson, Peggy, Finley, Judson, Hall, Stephen A., Hayden, William E., Rohe, Chris M., Seaman, Tim, Taddie, Sasha, and Thompson, Scott 2005 Adaptive Management and Planning Models for Cultural Resources in Oil and Gas Fields in New Mexico and Wyoming. Final technical report to Department of Energy, DE-FC26-02NT15445.Google Scholar
Laumbach, Karl W. and Kirkpatrick, David T. 1983 The Black Range Survey: A 2% Archaeological Sample of State Lands in Western Sierra County, New Mexico. Cultural Resource Management Division, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.Google Scholar
Laurenzi, Andy 2012 Priority Prehistoric Cultural Resources, Pinal County, Arizona. Technical Report No. 2012-101. Archaeology Southwest, Tucson.Google Scholar
Lekson, Stephen H. 1978 Settlement Patterns in the Redrock Valley, Southwestern New Mexico. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Eastern New Mexico University, Portales.Google Scholar
Lekson, Stephen H. 1989 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Rio Grande Valley in Sierra County, New Mexico. The Artifact 27(2):1–87.Google Scholar
Lipe, William D. 1974 A Conservation Model for American Archaeology. Kiva 39(3–4):213–245.Google Scholar
Lipe, William D. 2009 Archaeological Values and Resource Management. In Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management: Visions for the Future, edited by Sebastian, Lynne and Lipe, William D., pp. 41–63. School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Mabry, Jonathan B. 1998 Paleoindian and Archaic Sites in Arizona. Arizona State Historic Preservation Office and the Center for Desert Archaeology, Phoenix and Tucson.Google Scholar
Mills, Barbara J., Clark, Jeffery J., Peeples, Matthew A., Haas, W. R. Jr., Roberts, John M. Jr., Brett Hill, J., Huntley, Deborah L., Borck, Lewis, Breiger, Ronald L., Clauset, Aaron and Steven Shackley, M. 2013 Transformation of Social Networks in the Late Prehispanic U.S. Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(15):5785–5790.Google Scholar
Mörtberg, U. M., Balfors, B., and Knol, W. C. 2007 Landscape Ecological Assessment: A Tool for Integrating Biodiversity Issues in Strategic Environmental Assessment and Planning. Journal of Environmental Management 82(4):457–470.Google Scholar
National Park Service (NPS) 2013 National Heritage Areas. Electronic document, http://www.nps.gov/heritageareas/, accessed September 20, 2013.Google Scholar
Myers, Norman, Mittermeier, Russell A., Mittermeier, Cristina G., da Fonseca, Gustavo A. B., and Kent, Jennifer 2000 Biodiversity Hotpots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 403(333):853–858.Google Scholar
Nelson, Margaret C. (editor) 1984 Ladder Ranch Research Project: A Report of the First Season. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Nelson, Margaret C. 1999 Mimbres during the Twelfth Century: Abandonment, Continuity, and Reorganization. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Nials, Fred L., Gregory, David A., and Brett Hill, J. 2011 The Stream Reach Concept and the Macro-Scale Study of Riverine Agriculture in Arid and Semi-Arid Environments. Geoarchaeology 26(5):724–761.Google Scholar
Pressey, R. L. 2004 Conservation Planning and Biodiversity: Assembling the Best Data for the Job. Conservation Biology 18(6):1677–1681 Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra 2009 Conservation Biology. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Electronic Document, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/conservation-biology/, accessed August 10, 2013.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Lynne 2009 Archaeological Values and Resource Management. In Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management: Visions for the Future, edited by Sebastian, Lynne and Lipe, William D., pp. 91–114. School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Lynne, and James Judge, W. (editors) 1988 Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, Denver.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Lynne, and Lipe, William D. (editors) 2009 Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management: Visions for the Future. School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Soulé, Michael E., and Wilcox, Bruce A. (editors) 1980 Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Thiel, Homer 1995 Rock Art in Arizona: A Component of the State Historic Plan. Arizona State Historic Preservation Office and the Center for Desert Archaeology, Phoenix and Tucson.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Fred 2008 Conservation Biology: Foundations, Concepts, Applications. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westcott, K.L. and Brandon, R.J. (editors) 2000 Practical Applications of GIS for Archaeologists: A Predictive Modeling Toolkit. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R., Doelle, William H., Brett Hill, J. and Holmland, James P. 2003 Coalescent Communities GIS Database Version 1.0: Museum of Northern Arizona, Archaeology Southwest, Western Mapping Company. Archaeology Southwest, Tucson.Google Scholar