Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:16:19.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances in Documentation of Commingled and Fragmentary Remains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2019

Anna J. Osterholtz*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Middle Eastern Cultures, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box AR, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA ([email protected])

Abstract

Commingled and fragmentary remains are found in numerous contexts worldwide. These assemblages typically require large scale, long term study to fully extract and contextualize meaningful data. However, when uncovered in CRM and foreign settings where remains cannot leave their country of origin, there is a need for quick, reliable data collection. Presented here is a recording system for use in field- and research-based laboratory settings. Utilizing visual forms and a minimal set of observations for skeletal elements from the cranium to the foot, the database facilitates data collection of fragment identification, age at death and sex estimation, dental observations, trauma recording, and taphonomic observations. A data dictionary is also provided, with definitions and value lists used in the database itself. The database has been used in field labs throughout the old world and by numerous researchers who have modified it to meet their own research needs. By presenting a minimal standard of data in a highly adaptable database, the recording system described here provides consistent baseline data in a user-friendly, quick-access format

Restos óseos mezclados y en estado fragmentario se encuentran en numerosos contextos en todo el mundo. Estos conjuntos típicamente requieren estudios a gran escala y de largo plazo para completamente extraer y contextualizar los datos significativos. Sin embargo, cuando se descubren durante actividades de gestión de recursos culturales o en contextos internacionales donde los restos no pueden salir de su país de origen, se necesita una manera confiable y rápida de recolectar datos. En este articulo presentamos un sistema de registro que puede emplearse en laboratorios de campo o de investigación. Utilizando formas visuales y un conjunto mínimo de observaciones para los elementos esqueléticos desde el cráneo hasta el pie, esta base de datos facilita la recopilación de información sobre identificación de fragmentos, estimación del sexo y de la edad al momento de la muerte, observaciones dentales, registro de trauma y observaciones tafonómicas. También se proporciona un diccionario de datos con definiciones y listas de valores usados en la base de datos. La base de datos ha sido usada en laboratorios de campo en todo el mundo y por numerosos investigadores quienes la han modificado para satisfacer sus propias necesidades de investigación. Al presentar un estándar mínimo de datos en una base de datos altamente adaptable, el sistema de registro descrito aquí provee datos de referencia consistentes en un formato fácil de usar y de rápido acceso.

Type
How to Series
Copyright
Copyright 2019 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Adams, Bradley J., and Konigsberg, Lyle W. 2008 How Many People? Determining the Number of Individuals Represented by Commingled Human Remains. In Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Remains, edited by Adams, Bradley J. and Byrd, John E., pp. 241255. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Austin, Anne E. 2017 OsteoSurvey: An Open-Source Data Collection Tool for Studying Commingled Human Remains. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Banks, Petra, and Osterholtz, Anna J. 2018 Cranial Trauma in an Early 20th Century Asylum: Injury Recidivism in the Mississippi State Asylum Assemblage. Poster presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Baustian, Kathryn M. 2010 Health Status of Infants and Children from the Bronze Age Tomb at Tell Abraq, United Arab Emirates. Unpublished Master's thesis, Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Baustian, Kathryn M., and Anderson, Cheryl P. 2016 Linking Health and Marriage Practices among Commingled Assemblages: A Case Study from Bronze Age Tell Abraq, UAE. In Theoretical Approaches to Analysis and Interpretation of Commingled Human Remains, edited by Osterholtz, Anna J., pp. 207218. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Boz, Basak, and Hager, Lori D. 2014 Making Sense of Social Behavior from Disturbed and Commingled Skeletons: A Case Study from Catalhoyuk, Turkey. In Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward Improved Theory, Method, and Data, edited by Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L., pp. 1734. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Brooks, Shielagh, and Suchey, Judy 1990 Skeletal Age Determination Based on the Os Pubis: A Comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks Methods. Human Evolution 5:227238.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane, and Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1994 Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Cope, Janet M. 2007 Musculoskeletal Attachment Site Markers and Skeletal Pathology of the Forearm and Carpal Bones from Tell Abraq, United Arab Emirates, c. 2300 BC. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Dutt, Animikha, Martin, Debra L., Prajapati, S., Keller, C., Gelovani, A., and Tomlinson, G. 2012 First Time Analysis of Tell Abraq Proximal Femora Using Micro 3-D Scanning: Analytic Implications for Age Estimation and Beyond. In Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Gregoricka, Lesley A. 2013 Residential Mobility and Social Identity in the Periphery: Strontium Isotope Analysis of Archaeological Tooth Enamel from Southeastern Arabia. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(1):452464.Google Scholar
Harrod, Ryan P., Osterholtz, Anna J., and Martin, Debra L. 2013 Cranial Depression Fractures of the Frontal Bones from a Bronze Age Arabian Commingled Tomb. Paper presented at the 2013 Meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropology, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Hermann, Nicholas P., and Devlin, J. B. 2008 Assessment of Commingled Human Remains Using a GIS Based Approach. In Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains, edited by Adams, Bradley J. and Byrd, John E., pp. 257269. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Knüsel, Christopher, and Outram, A. K. 2004 Fragmentation: The Zonation Method Applied to Fragmented Human Remains from Archaeological and Forensic Contexts. Environmental Archaeology 9:8597.Google Scholar
Kuckelman, Kristin A., Lightfoot, Ricky R., and Martin, Debra L. 2000 Changing Patterns of Violence in the Northern San Juan Region. Kiva 66(1):147165.Google Scholar
Lopez, Andrea, Paige, Julianne, Osterholtz, Anna J., and Tomas, Helena 2018 Tumultuous Tumuli: Demography and Pathological Analysis of the Bronze Age Gusića Gomila II Site, Croatia. Poster presented at the Annual Paleopathology Association Meeting, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, T. R., Pryzbeck, T. R., and Mensforth, R. P. 1985 Chronological Metamorphosis of the Auricular Surface of the Ilium: A New Method for the Determination of Adult Skeletal Age at Death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:1528.Google Scholar
Mayus, R. C., Sheridan, Susan G., and Larsen, Clark S. 2017 Constructing Demographic Profiles in Commingled Collections: A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Age at Death in a Byzantine Monastic Assemblage. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Osteoware 2014 Osteoware Software. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J. 2013 Hobbling and Torture as Performative Violence: An Example from the Prehistoric Southwest. Kiva 78(2):123144.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J. 2014 Extreme Processing at Mancos and Sacred Ridge: The Value of Comparative Studies. In Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward Improved Theory, Method, and Data, edited by Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L., pp. 105128. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J. 2015 Bodies in Motion: A Bioarchaeological Analysis of Migration and Identity in Bronze Age Cyprus (2400–1100 BC). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J. 2016 Each One the Same: Performance, Demography, and Violence at Sacred Ridge. Paper presented at the 115th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J. 2017 The Perfect Storm: Violence, Disease and Displacement. Paper presented at the 116th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J. 2018 Perinatal Health as an Indicator of Maternal Health Factors during the Roman Civil War: Preliminary Analysis of the Put Dragulina Cemetery, Trogir, Croatia. Poster presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L. 2012 Determining the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) for Tell Abraq, UAE. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Memphis, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L. 2014 Introduction. In Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward Improved Theory, Method, and Data, edited by Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L., pp. 116. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L. (editors) 2014 Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward Improved Theory, Method, and Data. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., Martin, Debra L., and Potts, Daniel T. 2014 Commingled Human Skeletal Assemblages: Integrative Techniques in Determination of the MNI/MNE. In Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward Improved Theory, Method, and Data, edited by Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L., pp. 3566. Springer Press, New York.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J., Lucas, Virginia, Gonciar, Andre, and Balos, Angelica 2016 Mortuary Practices in the First Iron Age Romanian Frontier: The Commingled Assemblages of the Magura Uroiului. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Osterholtz, Anna J., and Stodder, Ann L. W. 2010 Conjoining a Neighborhood: Data Structure and Methodology for Taphonomic Analysis of the Very Large Assemblage from Sacred Ridge. Poster presented at the American Association of Physical Anthropologists Meetings, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Outram, A. K., Knüsel, C. J., Knight, S., and Harding, A. F. 2005 Understanding Complex Fragmented Assemblages of Human and Animal Remains: A Fully Integrated Approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(12):16991710.Google Scholar
Panakhyo, Maria 2013 Evaluation of the Methodology for Addressing Commingled Human Remains from the Lewis Jones Cave Ossuary (1SC42) in St. Clair, Alabama. Unpublished Master's thesis, Anthropology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Pérez, Ventura R. 2002 La Quemada Tool Induced Bone Alterations: Cutmark Differences between Human and Animal Bone. Archaeology Southwest 16(1):10.Google Scholar
Phenice, T. W. 1969 A Newly Developed Visual Method of Sexing the Os Pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 30(2):297301.Google Scholar
Reeder, Trent, and Horton, Kristina 2007 Two Digital Worlds Meet: Digital Data Management of the Animas–La Plata Archaeological Project. Paper presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Stodder, Ann L. W., and Osterholtz, Anna J. 2010 Analysis of the Processed Human Remains from the Sacred Ridge Site: Methods and Data Collection Protocol. In Animas–La Plata Project, XV: Bioarchaeology, edited by Perry, E. M., Stodder, A. L. W., and Bollong, C. A., pp. 243278. SWCA Environmental Consultants, Phoenix, Arizona.Google Scholar
Stodder, Ann L. W., Osterholtz, Anna J., Mowrer, Kathy, and Chuipka, Jason P. 2010 Processed Human Remains from the Sacred Ridge Site: Context, Taphonomy, Interpretation. In Animas–La Plata Project, XV: Bioarchaeology, edited by Perry, E. M., Stodder, A. L. W., and Bollong, C. A., pp. 279415. SWCA Environmental Consultants, Phoenix, Arizona.Google Scholar
Sussman, E., and Perry, Megan A. 2015 Comparing Methodologies for Documenting Commingled and Fragmentary Human Remains: A Case Study from Petra. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Schools of Oriental Research, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Todd, T. W. 1921 Age Changes in the Pubic Bone. I: The Male White Pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 3:285334.Google Scholar
Zejdlik, Katie J. 2014 Unmingling Commingled Museum Collections: A Photographic Method. In Commingled and Disarticulated Human Remains: Working toward Improved Theory, Method, and Data, edited by Osterholtz, Anna J., Baustian, Kathryn M., and Martin, Debra L., pp. 173192. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Osterholtz supplementary material

Osterholtz supplementary material 1

Download Osterholtz supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 224.1 KB