Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:44:00.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating the Potential of Deaccessioning as a Tool for Public Archaeology Education

An Example from New Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

Jenna Domeischel Open the ORCID record for Jenna Domeischel [Opens in a new window]  and
Tawnya Waggle
Jenna Domeischel*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Applied Archaeology, Eastern New Mexico University, 1500 S. Ave. K, Station 53, Portales, NM 88130, USA
Tawnya Waggle
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Applied Archaeology, Eastern New Mexico University, 1500 S. Ave. K, Station 53, Portales, NM 88130, USA
*
([email protected], corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the United States, deaccessioning is a poorly understood collections management tool. Archaeologists often view deaccessioning with what Robert Sonderman called “primal fear,” and this fear has caused them to overlook the opportunities that deaccessioned artifacts and collections may provide in the area of public archaeology education. Although deaccessioning without checks and balances can be problematic, when done properly and ethically, it offers previously untapped resources to the creation of educational programming, such as teaching trunk programs. This article discusses the process of deaccessioning and suggests that deaccessioned artifacts may be useful as content for teaching trunk programs. We discuss a case study from our own institution, where we implemented a trunk program in 2016 that was largely stocked with material from a deaccession we had performed the previous year. We also offer suggestions for anyone wishing to implement a similar program.

En los Estados Unidos, el desacoplamiento es una herramienta de gestión de colecciones poco conocida. Los arqueólogos muchas veces ven el desapego con lo que Robert Sonderman llamó “miedo primario”, y este miedo nos ha llevado a pasar por alto las oportunidades que los artefactos y colecciones desacreditadas pueden brindarnos en el área de la educación pública de arqueología. Mientras se desacopla sin controles ni equilibrios puede ser problemática, si se realiza de manera adecuada y ética, ofrece fuentes no explotadas previamente para la creación de programaciones educativas, como la enseñanza de programas troncales. Este artículo discute el proceso de desaccesión y sugiere que los artefactos desacoplados pueden ser útiles como contenido para enseñar programas troncales. Discutimos un estudio de caso de nuestra propia institución, donde implementamos un programa troncal en 2016 que estaba en gran parte abastecido con material de desaparición que realizamos el año anterior. También identificamos los desafíos que encontramos durante este proceso y ofrecemos sugerencias para cualquiera que desee implementar un programa similar.

Keywords

public archaeologyeducationdeaccessioningcollections managementcurationteaching trunkarqueología públicaeducacióncesiónmanejo de coleccionescuraduriamateriales educativos
Type
Articles
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 420 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

AAM (American Alliance of Museums) 2020 Deaccessioning and Disposal. Electronic document, https://www.aam-us.org/programs/resource-library/collections-stewardship-resources/deaccessioning-disposal/, accessed July 21, 2020.Google Scholar
Ainslie, Patricia 2004 Deaccessioning as a Collections Management Tool. In Museums and the Future of Collecting, 2nd ed., edited by Knell, Simon, pp. 235–241. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Childs, S. Terry 1995 The Curation Crisis. Federal Archaeology 7:11–15.Google Scholar
Childs, S. Terry 1999 Contemplating the Future: Deaccessioning Federal Collections. Museum Anthropology 23:38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, S. Terry 2019 The Possibility of Deaccessioning Federal Archaeological Collections. In Using and Curating Archaeological Collections, edited by Terry Childs, S. and Warner, Mark S., pp. 129–139. SAA Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Davies, Peter (editor) 2011 Museums and the Disposals Debate: A Collection of Essays. MuseumsEtc, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Malaro, Marie C., and DeAngelis, Ildiko Pogany 2012 A Legal Primer on Managing Museum Collections. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Miller, Steven 2018 Deaccessioning Today: Theory and Practice. Rowman & Littlefield, London.Google Scholar
MMA (Maxwell Museum of Anthropology) 2020 Traveling Trunk Programs. Electronic document, https://maxwellmuseum.unm.edu/education/k-12/traveling-trunk-programs, accessed December 1, 2019.Google Scholar
OSAI (Office of the State Archaeologist of Iowa) 2020 Archaeology Discovery Trunks for Educators. Electronic document, https://archaeology.uiowa.edu/archaeology-discovery-trunks-educators, accessed July 2, 2020.Google Scholar
Phillips, Laura S. 2004 Adaptive Reuse: Incorporating Public Education into the Curation Process. In Our Collective Responsibility: The Ethics and Practice of Archaeological Collections Stewardship, edited by Terry Childs, S., pp. 137–145. SAA Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ryan, Bryanna M. 2013 Museum on the Move: Developing a Traveling Trunk Program for the Sacramento History Museum. Electronic document, http://csus-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.9/2350/B%20Ryan%20Thesis%20-%20FINAL%20VERSION%20-%20DONE%2011-22-2013.pdf?sequence=1, accessed June 22, 2020.Google Scholar
Sonderman, Robert C. 1996 Primal Fear: Deaccessioning Collections. Common Ground 1(2):26–29.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Lynne P., and Terry Childs, S. 2003 Curating Archaeological Collections: From the Field to the Repository. Vol. 6. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Thum, Jen, and Troche, Julia 2016 Visitor as Researcher: Making Archaeology More Accessible with Broken and Unprovenienced Objects. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Stephen E. (editor) 1997 A Deaccession Reader. American Association of Museums, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wing, Alan, Giachritsis, Christos, and Roberts, Roberta 2016 Weighing Up the Value of Touch. In The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museum and Heritage Contexts, edited by Pye, Elizabeth, pp. 31–43. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Domeischel and Waggle supplementary material

Appendix B

Download Domeischel and Waggle supplementary material(File)
File 34 KB
Supplementary material: File

Domeischel and Waggle supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Domeischel and Waggle supplementary material(File)
File 111.4 KB