Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:40:31.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Complex Environments

An Approach from the Ancient Maya Site of Pacbitun, Belize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Jennifer Weber  and
Terry G. Powis
Jennifer Weber
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet Bonn, Department of Anthropology of the Americas, Oxfordstr. 15, 53111 Bonn, Germany ([email protected])
Terry G. Powis
Affiliation:
Kennesaw State University, Department of Geography and Anthropology, 1000 Chastain Rd., MD 2203, SO Bldg. 22, Rm. 4048, Kennesaw, GA 30144-5591, USA ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The majority of terrestrial scanning projects in archaeology have focused on heritage documentation, preservation, and the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of prominent sites and objects. While these are very important archaeological foci, not many have used terrestrial scanning methods for prospection and feature analysis, similar to the way many have employed airborne LiDAR. While airborne LiDAR scanning is able to situate and analyze archaeological sites on an expansive scale, the ground-based method also captures and defines any landscape anomalies or depressions from cultural features that have remained invisible to the naked eye due to environmental restrictions. In an attempt to test this recording method, we set out to paint a non-invasive, 3D digitized picture of the ancient Maya site of Pacbitun, Belize, using terrestrial scanning to distinctly detail Pacbitun’s structures, plazas, causeways, and karst features. This paper details the process through which 3D terrestrial scanning was executed at Pacbitun and three associated peripheral caves during the 2012 and 2013 field seasons. We discuss the potential laser scanning has for visual analysis in archaeology and evaluate application difficulties encountered in the field, as well as current data interpretation issues.

Hasta la fecha, la mayoría de los proyectos de exploración terrestre en arqueología se han centrado en la documentación del patrimonio, la conservación y/o la reconstrucción tridimensional de sitios destacados, así como el modelaje de objetos. Si bien éstos son importantes focos arqueológicos, pocos proyectos han utilizado métodos de exploración terrestre para la prospección y análisis de elementos de manera similar a la forma en que muchos han empleado LiDAR aéreo. Mientras que la exploración aérea LiDAR es capaz de situar y analizar sitios arqueológicos a una escala amplia, el método terrestre también captura y define cualquier anomalía o depresiones en el paisaje como producto de las características culturales que han permanecido invisibles a simple vista debido a restricciones ambientales. En un intento de probar este método de registro, nos propusimos producir una imagen digitalizada tridimensional no invasiva del antiguo sitio Maya de Pacbitun, Belice, utilizando la exploración terrestre para detallar claramente las estructuras, plazas, calzadas, y características kársticas de Pacbitun. En este trabajo se detalla el proceso a través del cual se ejecutó la exploración terrestre 3D en Pacbitun y en tres cuevas periféricas asociadas durante las temporadas de campo de 2012 y 2013. Se discute el potencial que tiene el escaneo láser para el análisis visual en arqueología y para evaluar las dificultades de aplicación que se encuentran en el campo, así como los problemas actuales en la interpretación de datos.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 123 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Al-kheder, Sharaf, Al-shawabkeh, Yahya, and Haala, Norbert 2009 Developing a Documentation System for Desert Palaces in Jordan Using 3D Laser Scanning and Digital Photogrammetry. Journal of Archaeological Science 36:537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armesto-González, Julia, Riveiro-Rodríguez, Belén, González-Aguilera, Diego, and Teresa Rivas-Brea, M. 2010 Terrestrial Laser Scanning Intensity Data Applied to Damage Detection for Historical Buildings. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:3037–3047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Anthony 2013 The Practice of Collaboration. In Interpreting Archaeological Topography, edited by Opitz, Rachel S. and Cowley, David C., pp. 252–265. Oxford Books, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchroithner, Manfred F., and Gaisecker, Thomas 2009 Terrestrial Laser Scanning for the Visualization of a Complex Dome in an Extreme Alpine Cave System. Photogrammetrie, Fernerkundng, Geoinformation 4:329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challis, Keith, Carey, Chris, Kincey, Mark, and Howard, Andy J. 2011 Airborne LiDAR Intensity and Geoarchaeological Prospection in River Valley Floors. Archaeological Prospection 18:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Arlen F., Chase, Diane Z., Fisher, Christopher T., Leisz, Stephen J., and Weishampel, John F. 2012 Geospatial Revolution and Remote Sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican Archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(32):12916-12921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, Arlen F., Chase, Diane Z., Weishampel, John F., Drake, Jason B., Shrestha, Ramesh L., Clint Slatton, K., Awe, Jaime J., and Carter, William E. 2011 Airborne LiDAR, Archaeology, and the Ancient Maya Landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawges, R., Vierling, L., Calhoon, M., and Toomey, M. 2007 Use of a Ground-Based Scanning LiDAR for Estimation of Biophysical Properties of Western Larch (Larix occidentalis). International Journal of Remote Sensing 28:4331–4344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, B.J., Amable, G.S., and Crow, P. 2008 Visualization of Lidar Terrain Models for Archaeological Feature Detection. Antiquity 79:648–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doneus, Michael, and Kuehtreiber, Thomas 2013 Airborne Laser Scanning and Archaeological Interpretation—Bringing Back the People. In Interpreting Archaeological Topography, edited by Opitz, Rachel S. and Cowley, David C., pp. 32–50. Oxford Books, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Doneus, and Neubauer, W. 2005 3D Laser Scanners on Archaeological Excavations. In Proceedings of the XXth International Symposium CIPA, pp. 226–231. Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
Doneus, Michael, Pfennigbauer, M., Studnicka, N., and Ulrich, A. 2009 Terrestrial Waveform Laser Scanning for Documentation of Cultural Heritage, In Proceeding of XXII CIPA Symposium, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
Gallay, Michael, Lloyd, Christopher D., McKinley, Jennifer, and Barry, Lorraine 2013 Assessing Modern Ground Survey Methods and Digital Terrain Modeling: A Case Study from the Lake District, England. Computers & Geosciences 51:216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giardino, Marco J. 2011 A History of NASA Remote Sensing Contributions to Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:2003–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Aguilera, Diego, Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, Pablo, Mancera-Taboada, Juan, Muñoz-Nieto, Angel, Herrero-Pascual, Jesus, Gomez-Lahoz, Javier, and Picon-Cabrera, Inmaculada 2011 Application of Non-Destructive Techniques to the Recording and Modelling of Palaeolithic Rock Art. In Laser Scanning, Theory and Applications, edited by Wang, Chau-Chang, pp. 305–326. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia.Google Scholar
Grussenmeyer, P., Landes, T., Voegtle, T., and Ringle, K. 2008 Comparison Methods of Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Photogrammetry and Tacheometry Data for Recording of Cultural Heritage Buildings. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 37(5):213–218.Google Scholar
Haddad, Naif Adel 2011 From Ground Surveying to 3D Laser Scanner: A Review of Techniques Used for Spatial Documentation of Historic Sites. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences 23:109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Paul F. 1990 Excavations at Pacbitun, Belize: Preliminary Report on the 1986 and 1987 Investigations. Journal of Field Archaeology 17:247–26.Google Scholar
Healy, Paul F. 1992 The Ancient Maya Ballcourt at Pacbitun, Belize. Ancient Mesoamerica 3:229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Paul F., Helmke, C.G.B., Awe, J.J., and Sunahara, K.S. 2007 Survey, Settlement, and Population History at the Ancient Maya Site of Pacbitun, Belize. Journal of Field Archaeology 32:17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Paul F, Hohmann, Bobbi, and Powis, Terry 2004 The ancient Maya Center of Pacbitun. In The Ancient Maya of the Belize Valley, edited by Garber, James F., pp. 207–227. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Healy, Paul F., Lambert, John D. H., Arnason, J. T., and Hebda, Richard J. 1983 Caracol, Belize: Evidence of Ancient Maya Agricultural Terraces. Journal of Field Archaeology 10(4):397–410.Google Scholar
Healy, Paul F., Song, Rhan-Ju, and Conlon, James M. 1996 Actun Petz: Preliminary Survey of a Cave Near Pacbitun, Belize. In Belize Valley Preclassic Maya Project: Progress Report on the 1995 Field Season 12:139–152. Department of Anthropology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario.Google Scholar
Hinzen, Klaus G., Schreiber, Stephan, and Rosellen, Sebastian 2012 A High Resolution Laser Scanning Model of the Roman Theater in Pinara, Turkey—Comparison to Previous Measurements and Search for the Causes of Damage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14:424–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerma, José Luis, Navarro, Santiago, Cabrelles, Miriam, and Villaverde, Valentín 2010 Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Close Range Photogrammetry for 3D Archaeological Documentation: The Upper Palaeolithic Cave of Parpalló as a Case Study. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, F.D., and Ladefoged, T.N. 2009 New Developments in the Use of Spatial Technology in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 17:263–295.Google Scholar
Masini, Nicola, Coluzzi, Rosa, and Lasaponara, Rosa 2011 On the Airborne Lidar Contribution in Archaeology: From Site Identification to Landscape Investigation. In Laser Scanning, Theory and Applications, edited by Wang, Chau-Chang, pp. 263–290. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia.Google Scholar
Núñez, Amparo, Buill, Felipe, and Edo, Manel 2013 3D Model of the Can Sadurní Cave. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:4420–4428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opitz, Rachel S. 2013 An Overview of Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Archaeology. In Interpreting Archaeological Topography, edited by Opitz, Rachel S. and Cowley, David C., pp. 13–31. Oxford Books, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirotti, Francesco, Guarnieri, Alberto, and Vettore, Antonio 2013 State of the Art of Ground and Aerial Laser Scanning Technologies for High Resolution Topography of the Earth Surface. European Journal of Remote Sensing 46:66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powis, Terry G. 2009 Pacbitun Preclassic Project: Report on the 2008 Field Season. Report Submitted to the Institute of Archaeology National Institute of Culture and History, Belmopan, Belize. Copies available from Kennesaw State University, Georgia, or the Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of Culture and History, Belmopan, Belize.Google Scholar
Powis, Terry G. 2010 Preliminary Investigations of Three Cave Sites in the Periphery of Pacbitun, Belize. Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 7:153–161.Google Scholar
Remondino, Fabio 2011 Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning. Remote Sensing 3:1104–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risbøl, Ole 2013 Cultivating the “Wilderness”—How LiDAR Can Improve Archaeological Landscape Understanding. In Interpreting Archaeological Topography, edited by Opitz, Rachel S. and Cowley, David C., pp. 51–62. Oxford Books, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanescu, Gheorge, Cotiug, Vasile, and As ndulesei, Andrei 2012 Use of Terrestrial 3D Laser Scanner in Cartographing and Monitoring Relief Dynamics and Habitation Space from Various Historical Periods. In Cartography—A Tool for Spatial Analysis, edited by Bateira, Carlos, pp. 49–74. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia.Google Scholar
Rosenswig, Robert M., López-Torrijos, Ricardo, Antonelli, Caroline E., and Mendelsohn, Rebecca R. 2013 Lidar Mapping and Surface Survey of the Izapa State on the Tropical Piedmont of Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:1493–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruether, Heinz, Chazan, Michael, Schroeder, Ralph, Neeser, Rudy, Held, Christoph, Walker, Steven James, Matmon, Ari, and Horwitz, Lisa Kolska 2009 Laser Scanning for Conservation and Research of African Cultural Heritage Sites: The Case Study of Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science 36:1847–1856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, D. 2011 Terrestrial Laser Scanning—Applications in Forest Ecological Research. Ph.D. dissertation, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, 2011.Google Scholar
Sittler, B., Weinacker, H., Gueltinger, M., and Koupaliantz, L. 2007 The Potential of Lidar in Assessing Elements of Cultural Heritage Hidden under Forests. In New Developments and Challenges in Remote Sensing, Proceedings of the 26th EARSeL, Warsaw, Poland, edited by Bochenek, Z., pp. 539–548. Millpress, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Skaggs, Sheldon, Powis, Terry, and Weber, Jennifer 2014 Searching for Patterns: Applying Spatial Technologies at Pacbitun, Belize. Manuscript on file, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Bronx Community College, Bronx, New York.Google Scholar
Spenard, Jon 2011 Heading to the Hills: A Preliminary Reconnaissance Report on Pacbitun’s Regional Landscape. In Pacbitun Regional Archaeology Project (PRAP): Report on the 2010 Field Season, edited by Powis, Terry G., pp. 33–89. Report submitted to the Institute of Archaeology National Institute of Culture and History, Belmopan, Belize. Copies available from Kennesaw State University, Georgia, or the Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of Culture and History, Belmopan, Belize.Google Scholar
Spenard, Jon 2012 Defining Community Ch’een: A Report on the 2011 Archaeological Cave and Karst Landscape Investigations around Pacbitun, Cayo District, Belize. In A Report on the 2011 Archaeological Investigations by the Pacbitun Regional Archaeological Project (PRAP), edited by Powis, Terry G., pp. 144–188. Report Submitted to the Institute of Archaeology National Institute of Culture and History, Belmopan, Belize.Google Scholar
Weber, Jennifer 2011 Investigating the Ancient Maya Landscape: A Settlement Survey in the Periphery of Pacbitun, Belize. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Weber, Jennifer, and Powis, Terry G. 2011 The Role of Caves at Pacbitun: Peripheral to the Site Center or Central to the Periphery? In Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 8:199–207. Belmopan, Belize.Google Scholar
Weber, Jennifer, Spenard, Jon, and Powis, Terry 2012 Assemblages in Focus: Aspects of the Cultural Landscapes in the Periphery of the Ancient Maya Site of Pacbitun, Belize. In Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 9:119–130. Belmopan, Belize.Google Scholar
White, Devin Alan 2013 Lidar, Point Clouds, and Their Archaeological Applications. In Mapping Archaeological Landscapes from Space, edited by Comter, Douglas C. and Harrower, Michael J., pp 11–10. New York, NY.Google Scholar