Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:36:35.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A weakly 1-stable distribution for the number of random records and cuttings in split trees

Part of: Algorithms - Computer Science Combinatorial probability Discrete mathematics in relation to computer science Theory of data Limit theorems Graph theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Cecilia Holmgren
Cecilia Holmgren*
Affiliation:
Uppsala University
*
∗ Current address: Algorithms Project, INRIA Rocquencourt, F-78153 Le Chesnay, France. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we study the number of random records in an arbitrary split tree (or, equivalently, the number of random cuttings required to eliminate the tree). We show that a classical limit theorem for the convergence of sums of triangular arrays to infinitely divisible distributions can be used to determine the distribution of this number. After normalization the distributions are shown to be asymptotically weakly 1-stable. This work is a generalization of our earlier results for the random binary search tree in Holmgren (2010), which is one specific case of split trees. Other important examples of split trees include m-ary search trees, quad trees, medians of (2k + 1)-trees, simplex trees, tries, and digital search trees.

Keywords

Random treesplit treecutrecordstable distributioninfinitely divisible distribution

MSC classification

Primary: 05C05: Trees 05C80: Random graphs 68W40: Analysis of algorithms 68P10: Searching and sorting
Secondary: 68R10: Graph theory (including graph drawing) 60C05: Combinatorial probability 60F05: Central limit and other weak theorems 68P05: Data structures
Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 151 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2011 

References

Asmussen, S. (1987). Applied Probability and Queues. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Beljaev, K. Ju. and Maksimov, V. M. (1963). Analytical properties of a generating function for the number of renewals. Theoret. Prob. Appl. 8, 108–112.Google Scholar
Bourdon, J. (2001). Size and path length of Patricia tries: dynamical sources context. Random Structures Algorithms 19, 289–315.Google Scholar
Broutin, N. and Holmgren, C. (2011). The total path length of split trees. Submitted.Google Scholar
Caliebe, A. (2003). Symmetric fixed points of a smoothing transformation. Adv. Appl. Prob. 35, 377–394.Google Scholar
Caliebe, A. and Rösler, U. (2003). Fixed points with finite variance of a smoothing transformation. Stoch. Process. Appl. 107, 105–129.Google Scholar
Devroye, L. (1998). Universal limit laws for depths in random trees. SIAM J. Comput. 28, 409–432.Google Scholar
Devroye, L. (2005). Applications of Stein's method in the analysis of random binary search trees. In Stein's Method and Applications (Lecture Notes Ser. Inst. Math. Sci. Natl. Univ. Sing. 5), Singapore University Press, pp. 247–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drmota, M., Iksanov, A., Möhle, M. and Rösler, U. (2009). A limiting distribution for the number of cuts needed to isolate the root of a random recursive tree. Random Structures Algorithms 34, 319–336.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1971). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Fill, J. A. and Janson, S. (2002). Quicksort asymptotics. J. Algorithms 44, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fill, J. A. and Kapur, N. (2004). Limiting distributions for additive functionals on Catalan trees. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 326, 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flajolet, P., Roux, M. and Vallée, B. (2010). Digital trees and memoryless sources: from arithmetics to analysis. To appear in Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, A. (1988). Stopped Random Walks. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, A. (2005). Probability: A Graduate Course. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Holmgren, C. (2010). A weakly 1-stable limiting distribution for the number of random records and cuttings in split trees. Preprint. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4590v1.Google Scholar
Holmgren, C. (2010). Novel characteristics of split trees by use of renewal theory. Preprint. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4594v1.Google Scholar
Holmgren, C. (2010). Random records and cuttings in binary search trees. Combinatorics Prob. Comput. 19, 391–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iksanov, A. and Meiners, M. (2010). Exponential rate of almost-sure convergence of intrinsic martingales in supercritical branching random walks. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 513–525.Google Scholar
Iksanov, A. and Möhle, M. (2007). A probabilistic proof of a weak limit law for the number of cuts needed to isolate the root of a random recursive tree. Electron. Commun. Prob. 12, 28–35.Google Scholar
Janson, S. (2004). Random records and cuttings in complete binary trees. In Mathematics and Computer Science. III, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 241–253.Google Scholar
Janson, S. (2006). Random cutting and records in deterministic and random trees. Random Structures Algorithms 29, 139–179.Google Scholar
Janson, S., Łuczak, T. and Rucinski, A. (2000). Random Graphs. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Mahmoud, H. (1986). On the average internal path length of m-ary search trees. Acta Informatica 23, 111–117.Google Scholar
Mahmoud, H. and Pittel, B. (1989). Analysis of the space of search trees under the random insertion algorithm. J. Algorithms 10, 52–75.Google Scholar
Meir, A. and Moon, J. W. (1970). Cutting down random trees. J. Austral. Math. Soc. 11, 313–324.Google Scholar
Neininger, R. and Rüschendorf, L. (1999). On the internal path length of d-dimensional quad trees. Random Structures Algorithms 15, 25–41.Google Scholar
Panholzer, A. (2003). Non-crossing trees revisited: cutting down and spanning subtrees. In Discrete Random Walks (Paris, 2003), Association of Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Nancy, pp. 265–276.Google Scholar
Panholzer, A. (2006). Cutting down very simple trees. Quaest. Math. 29, 211–227.Google Scholar
Rösler, U. (2001). On the analysis of stochastic divide and conquer algorithms. Algorithmica 29, 238–261.Google Scholar