Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:50:54.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solving the Fisher-Wright and coalescence problems with a discrete Markov chain analysis

Part of: Markov processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Samuel R. Buss  and
Peter Clote
Samuel R. Buss*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Peter Clote*
Affiliation:
Boston College
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Email address: [email protected]
∗∗ Postal address: Department of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA. Email address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a new, self-contained proof that the expected number of generations required for gene allele fixation or extinction in a population of size n is O(n) under general assumptions. The proof relies on a discrete Markov chain analysis. We further develop an algorithm to compute expected fixation or extinction time to any desired precision. Our proofs establish O(nH(p)) as the expected time for gene allele fixation or extinction for the Fisher-Wright problem, where the gene occurs with initial frequency p and H(p) is the entropy function. Under a weaker hypothesis on the variance, the expected time is O(n(p(1-p))1/2) for fixation or extinction. Thus, the expected-time bound of O(n) for fixation or extinction holds in a wide range of situations. In the multi-allele case, the expected time for allele fixation or extinction in a population of size n with n distinct alleles is shown to be O(n). From this, a new proof is given of a coalescence theorem about the mean time to the most recent common ancestor (MRCA), which applies to a broad range of reproduction models satisfying our mean and weak variation conditions.

Keywords

Fisher-Wright modeldiffusion equationpopulation geneticsmitochondrial EveMarkov chainmean stopping timecoalescencemartingale

MSC classification

Primary: 60J05: Discrete-time Markov processes on general state spaces
Secondary: 60J20: Applications of Markov chains and discrete-time Markov processes on general state spaces (social mobility, learning theory, industrial processes, etc.) 60J22: Computational methods in Markov chains 60J70: Applications of Brownian motions and diffusion theory (population genetics, absorption problems, etc.)
Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 1175 - 1197
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

Supported in part by NSF Grant DMS-9803515 and DMS-0100589

References

[1] Avise, J., Neigel, J. and Arnold, J. (1984). Demographic influences on mitochondrial DNA lineage survivorship in animal populations. J. Molecular Evolution 20, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[2] Cann, R., Stoneking, M. and Wilson, A. (1987). Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature 325, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[3] Cannings, C. (1974). The latent roots of certain Markov chains arising in genetics: a new approach. I. Haploid models. 6, 260–290.Google Scholar
[4] Donnelly, P. (1991). Weak convergence to a Markov chain with an entrance boundary: ancestral processes in population genetics. Ann. Prob. 19, 1102–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Ewens, W. J. (1963). The mean time for absorption in a process of genetic type. J. Austral. Math. Soc. 3, 375–383.Google Scholar
[6] Ewens, W. J. (1964). The pseudo-transient distribution and its uses in genetics. J. Appl. Prob. 1, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Ewens, W. J. (1979). Mathematical Population Genetics. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
[8] Feller, W. (1951). Diffusion processes in genetics. In Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob., ed. Neyman, J., University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 227–246.Google Scholar
[9] Feller, W. (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[10] Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Karlin, S. and McGregor, J. (1966). The number of mutant forms maintained in a population. In Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob., Vol. 4, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 403–414.Google Scholar
[12] Kimura, M. (1955). Solution of a process of random genetic drift with a continuous model. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 41, 144–150.Google Scholar
[13] Kimura, M. (1962). On the problem of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713–719.Google Scholar
[14] Kimura, M. (1964). Diffusion models in population genetics. J. Appl. Prob. 1, 177–232.Google Scholar
[15] Kingman, J. F. C. (1982). The coalescent. Stoch. Process. Appl. 13, 235–248.Google Scholar
[16] Kingman, J. F. C. (1982). Exchangeability and the evolution of large populations. In Exchangeability in Probability and Statistics, eds Koch, G. and Spizzichino, F., North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
[17] Kingman, J. F. C. (1982). On the genealogy of large populations. In Essays in Statistical Science (J. Appl. Prob. Spec. Vol. 19A), eds Gani, J. and Hannan, E. J., Applied Probability Trust, Sheffield, pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
[18] Möhle, M., (1998). Robustness results for the coalescent. J. Appl. Prob. 35, 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Möhle, M., (1999). The concept of duality and applications to Markov processes arising in neutral population genetics models. Bernoulli 5, 761–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Möhle, M., (2004). The time back to the most recent common ancestor in exchangeable population models. Adv. Appl. Prob. 36, 78–97.Google Scholar
[21] Schensted, I. (1958). Appendix: Model of subnuclear segregation in the macronucleus of ciliates. Amer. Naturalist 92, 161–170.Google Scholar
[22] Takahata, N. (ed.) (1994). Population Genetics, Molecular Evolution, and The Neutral Theory: Selected Papers. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
[23] Tavaré, S., (1995). Calibrating the clock: using stochastic processes to measure the rate of evolution. In Calculating the Secrets of Life. Applications of the Mathematical Sciences in Molecular Biology, eds Lander, E. S. and Waterman, M. S., National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 114–152.Google Scholar
[24] Tavaré, S., (1997). Ancestral inference from DNA sequence data. In Case Studies in Mathematical Modeling: Ecology, Physiology, and Cell Biology, eds Othmer, H. G. et al., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
[25] Watterson, G. (1962). Some theoretical aspects of diffusion theory in population genetics. Ann. Math. Statist. 33, 939–957. (Correction: 34 (1963), 352.)Google Scholar
[26] Watterson, G. (1996). Motoo Kimura's use of diffusion theory in population genetics. Theoret. Pop. Biol. 49, 154–158.Google Scholar
[27] Wright, S. (1945). The differential equation of the distribution of gene frequencies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 31, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[28] Wright, S. (1949). Adaptation and selection. In Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution, eds Jepson, G., Simpson, G., and Mayr, E., Princeton University Press, pp. 365–389.Google Scholar