Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:16:23.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Renewal processes decomposable into i.i.d. components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Yoshifusa Ito
Yoshifusa Ito*
Affiliation:
Nagoya University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let N be a stationary renewal process with a probability density function f(t). Suppose that N can be expressed as the superposition of a finite number of i.i.d. stationary components N(1), …, N(p) (p≧2). Then, under a supplementary condition on f(t), N and N(1), …, N(p) are all Poisson. This is proved by using recurrence relations given in Ito (1978) for the probability distribution of i.i.d. components of a superposition process.

Keywords

POINT PROCESSRENEWAL PROCESSPOISSON PROCESSDECOMPOSITION OF POINT PROCESS
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 672 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Çinlar, E. (1972) Superposition of point processes. In Stochastic Point Processes, ed. Lewis, P. A. W., Wiley, New York, 549–606.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. (1973) Poisson and alternating renewal processes with superposition a renewal process. Math. Nachr. 57, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberland, E. (1975) Infinitely divisible recurrent point processes. Math. Nachr. 70, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Y. (1978) Superposition and decomposition of stationary point processes. J. Appl. Prob. 15, 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukacs, E. (1970) Characteristic Functions. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
Störmer, H. (1969) Zur Überlagerung von Erneuerungs Prozesses. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 13, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar