Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:44:08.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Random motions at finite velocity in a non-Euclidean space

Part of: Global differential geometry Special processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

E. Orsingher  and
A. De Gregorio
E. Orsingher*
Affiliation:
University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’
A. De Gregorio*
Affiliation:
University of Padua
*
∗ Postal address: Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy. Email address: [email protected]
∗∗ Current address: Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Aziendali e Statistiche, University of Milan, via del Conservatorio 7, Milano, 20122, Italy.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper telegraph processes on geodesic lines of the Poincaré half-space and Poincaré disk are introduced and the behavior of their hyperbolic distances examined. Explicit distributions of the processes are obtained and the related governing equations derived. By means of the processes on geodesic lines, planar random motions (with independent components) in the Poincaré half-space and disk are defined and their hyperbolic random distances studied. The limiting case of one-dimensional and planar motions together with their hyperbolic distances is discussed with the aim of establishing connections with the well-known stochastic representations of hyperbolic Brownian motion. Extensions of motions with finite velocity to the three-dimensional space are also hinted at, in the final section.

Keywords

Hyperbolic distancetelegraph processLobachevsky geometryhyperbolic equationgeodesic lineBougerol's identity

MSC classification

Primary: 60K40: Other physical applications of random processes
Secondary: 53C22: Geodesics
Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 588 - 611
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2007 

References

Alili, L., Dufresne, D. and Yor, M. (1997). Sur l'identité de Bougerol pour les fonctionnelles exponentielles du mouvement brownien avec drift. In Exponential Functionals and Principal Values Related to Brownian Motion, Revista Matemática Iberoamericana, Madrid, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Comtet, A. and Monthus, C. (1996). Diffusion in a one-dimensional random medium and hyperbolic Brownian motion. J. Phys. A 29, 1331–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsenshtein, M. E. and Vasiliev, V. B. (1959). Waveguides with random inhomogeneities and Brownian motion in the Lobachevsky plane. Theory Prob. Appl. 3, 391–398.Google Scholar
Gruet, J. C. (1996). Semi-groupe du mouvement brownien hyperbolique. Stoch. Stoch. Rep. 56, 53–61.Google Scholar
Gruet, J. C. (1998). On the length of the homotopic Brownian word in the thrice punctured sphere. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 111, 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruet, J. C. (2000). A note on hyperbolic von Mises distributions. Bernoulli 6, 1007–1020.Google Scholar
Karpelevich, F. I., Tutubalin, V. N. and Shur, M. C. (1959). Limit theorems for the composition of distributions in the Lobachevsky plane. Theory Prob. Appl. 3, 399–401.Google Scholar
Kolesnik, A. D. (2001). Weak convergence of a planar random evolution to the Wiener process. J. Theoret. Prob. 14, 485–494.Google Scholar
Lalley, S. P. and Sellke, T. (1997). Hyperbolic branching Brownian motion. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 108, 171–192.Google Scholar
Lao, L. and Orsingher, E. (2007). Hyperbolic and fractional hyperbolic Brownian motion. To appear in Stochastics.Google Scholar
Monthus, C. and Texier, C. (1996). Random walk on the Bethe lattice and hyperbolic Brownian motion. J. Phys. A 29, 2399–2409.Google Scholar
Orsingher, E. (1990). Probability law, flow function, maximum distribution of wave-governed random motions and their connections with Kirchoff's laws. Stoch. Process. Appl. 34, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratanov, N. (1999). Telegraph evolutions in inhomogeneous media. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 5, 53–68.Google Scholar
Rogers, L. C. G. and Williams, D. (1987). Diffusions, Markov Processes and Martingales, Vol. 2, Itô Calculus. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Royster, D. C. (2004). Non-Euclidean geometry. http://www.math.uncc.edu/∼droyster/courses/spring04/index.html.Google Scholar
Simon, T. (2002). Concentration of the Brownian bridge on the hyperbolic plane. Ann. Prob. 30, 1977–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terras, A. (1985). Harmonic Analysis on Symmetric Spaces and Applications. I. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Yor, M. (1992). On some exponential functionals of Brownian motion. Adv. Appl. Prob. 24, 509–531.Google Scholar