Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:25:59.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the solution of the Fokker–Planck equation for a Feller process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

L. Sacerdote
L. Sacerdote*
Affiliation:
University of Salerno
*
∗Postal address: Dipartimento di Informatica e Applicazioni, Facoltà di Scienze, Università di Salerno, 84100 Salerno, Italy.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Use of one-parameter group transformations is made to obtain the transition p.d.f. of a Feller process confined between the origin and a hyperbolic-type boundary. Such a procedure, previously used by Bluman and Cole (cf., for instance, [4]), although useful for dealing with one-dimensional diffusion processes restricted between time-varying boundaries, does not appear to have been sufficiently exploited to obtain solutions to the diffusion equations associated to continuous Markov processes.

Keywords

TIME-VARYING BOUNDARIESONE-PARAMETER GROUP TRANSFORMATIONS
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 101 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (1972) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
[2] Bluman, G. W. (1971) Similarity solutions of the one-dimensional Fokker–Planck equation. Int. J. Non-linear Mechanics 6, 143–153.Google Scholar
[3] Bluman, G. W. and Cole, J. D. (1969) The general similarity solution of the heat equation. J. Math. Mech. 18, 1025–1042.Google Scholar
[4] Bluman, G. W. and Cole, J. D. (1974) Similarity Methods for Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
[5] Feller, W. (1951). Two singular diffusion processes. Ann. Math. 54, 173–182.Google Scholar
[6] Giorno, V., Nobile, A. G., Ricciardi, L. M. and Sacerdote, L. (1986) Some remarks on the Rayleigh process. J. Appl. Prob. 23, 398–408.Google Scholar
[7] Karlin, S. and Taylor, H. W. (1981). A Second Course in Stochastic Processes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
[8] Lie, S. (1881) Über die Integration durch bestimmte Integrale von einer Klasse linearer partieller Differential Gleichungen. Arch. Math. VI, 328.Google Scholar
[9] Ricciardi, L. M. and Sacerdote, L. (1987) On the probability densities of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process with a reflecting boundary. J. Appl. Prob. 24, 355–369.Google Scholar
[10] Tricomi, F. G. (1954) Funzioni ipergeometriche confluenti. Cremonese, Roma.Google Scholar