Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:45:05.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geometry of the Poisson Boolean model on a region of logarithmic width in the plane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Amites Dasgupta*
Affiliation:
Indian Statistical Institute
Rahul Roy*
Affiliation:
Indian Statistical Institute
Anish Sarkar*
Affiliation:
Indian Statistical Institute
*
Postal address: Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Kolkata 700108, India. Email address: [email protected]
∗∗ Postal address: Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 7 S. J. S. Sansanwal Marg, New Delhi 110016, India.
∗∗ Postal address: Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 7 S. J. S. Sansanwal Marg, New Delhi 110016, India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consider the region L = {(x, y): 0 ≤ yClog(1 + x), x > 0} for a constant C > 0. We study the percolation and coverage properties of this region. For the coverage properties, we place a Poisson point process of intensity λ on the entire half space R+ x R and associated with each Poisson point we place a box of a random side length ρ. Depending on the tail behaviour of the random variable ρ we exhibit a phase transition in the intensity for the eventual coverage of the region L. For the percolation properties, we place a Poisson point process of intensity λ on the region R2. At each point of the process we centre a box of a random side length ρ. In the case ρ ≤ R for some fixed R > 0 we study the critical intensity λc of the percolation on L.

Type
Stochastic Geometry and Statistical Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2011 

Footnotes

Supported by a grant from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

References

Athreya, S., Roy, R. and Sarkar, A. (2004). On the coverage of space by random sets. Adv. Appl. Prob. 36, 118.Google Scholar
Grimmett, G. R. (1983). Bond percolation on subsets of the square lattice, and the threshold between one-dimensional and two-dimensional behaviour. J. Phys. A. 16, 599604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmett, G. R. (1999). Percolation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1988). Introduction to the Theory of Coverage Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Meester, R. and Roy, R. (1996). Continuum Percolation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molchanov, I. and Scherbakov, V. (2003). Coverage of the whole space. Adv. Appl. Prob. 35, 898912.Google Scholar
Penrose, M. (2003). Random Geometric Graphs. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Petrov, V. V. (2004). A generalization of the Borel–Cantelli lemma. Statist. Prob. Lett. 67, 233239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S. and Mecke, J. (1987). Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Tanemura, H. (1993). Behavior of the supercritical phase of a continuum percolation model on R d . J. Appl. Prob. 30, 382396.Google Scholar
Tanemura, H. (1996). Critical behavior for a continuum percolation model. In Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. (Tokyo, 1995), World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, pp. 485495.Google Scholar