Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:59:11.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The geometry of random drift V. Axiomatic derivation of the WFK diffusion from a variational principle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Peter L. Antonelli*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2G1.

Abstract

An axiomatic derivation of the Wright–Fisher–Kimura (wfk) diffusion model for genetic drift is given using a variational principle. This is analogous to the characterization of the standard normal distribution in terms of an isoperimetric problem in the calculus of variations where the integrand is Shannon's information measure. We, on the other hand, give a Fisher-type information-theoretic interpretation of the variational principle largely motivated by the geometric approach to statistical likelihood theory due to S. V. Huzurbazzar, B. R. Rao and A. W. F. Edwards. In our process theory, the Ricci curvature tensor plays the role of information matrix. Ultimately, it is proved to be a normalized matrix of second partial derivates of the pseudodensity associated with the Christoffel velocity field. The proofs use classical projective differential geometry and depend on previous work in this series on the geometry of random drift.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Research partially supported by NRC A-7667.

References

Antonelli, P. L. (1978) The geometry of random drift IV. Random time substitutions and stationary densities. Adv. Appl. Prob. 10, 563569.Google Scholar
Antonelli, P. L., Chapin, J., Lathrop, G. M. and Morgan, K. (1977) The geometry of random drift II. The symmetry of random genetic drift. Adv. Appl. Prob. 9, 260267.Google Scholar
Antonelli, P. L., Morgan, K. and Lathrop, G.M. (1977) The geometry of random drift III. Recombination and diffusion. Adv. Appl. Prob. 9, 260267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, P. L. and Strobeck, C. (1977) The geometry of random drift I. Stochastic distance and diffusion. Adv. Appl. Prob. 9, 238249.Google Scholar
Cavalli–Sforza, L. L. and Bodmer, W. F. (1971) The Genetics of Human Populations. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Dynkin, E. B. (1965) Markov Processes, Vol I. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. W. F. (1965) Likelihood, Vol I. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Eisenhart, L. P. (1926) Riemannian Geometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Ethier, S. (1979) Limit theorems for absorption times of genetic models. Ann. Prob.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1969) Population Genetics. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. I. (1962) Curvature and Homology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Huzurbazzar, V. S. (1949) On a property of distributions admitting sufficient statistics. Biometrika 36, 7174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, P. A. P. (1962) Statistical Processes of Evolutionary Theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Petrov, A. Z. (1969) Einstein Spaces. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rao, B. R. (1960) A formula for the curvature of the likelihood surface of a sample drawn from a distribution admitting sufficient statistics. Biometrika 47, 203208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, C. E. (1964) Geometry and Analysis of Projective Spaces. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar