Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:12:54.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brownian motion and a sharply curved boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

A. D. Barbour*
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
*
Postal address: Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, U.K.

Abstract

Daniels (1974) reduced the problem of approximating the distribution of the maximum size of a closed epidemic to that of finding the distribution of max0≦t≦2 {W(t) – N1/2c(t)}, where c is a smooth function with a unique minimum of 0 at t = 1, and he derived an approximation to this distribution which he showed to be accurate to order N–1/4. In this paper, his approximation is shown to be accurate to order N–1/3, and a refined approximation is given which is accurate to order N–1/2 log N. The new approximation is still normal, and its accuracy is similar to that of the original approximation of a discrete process by the Wiener process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbour, A. D. (1975) A note on the maximum size of a closed epidemic. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 37, 459460.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. E. (1974) The maximum size of a closed epidemic. Adv. Appl. Prob. 6, 607621.Google Scholar
Komlós, J., Major, P. and Tusnády, G. (1975) An approximation of partial sums of independent RV'-s and the sample DF. I. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 32, 111131.Google Scholar
Nagaev, A. V. and Startsev, A. N. (1970) The asymptotic analysis of a stochastic model of an epidemic. Theory Prob. Appl. 15, 98107.Google Scholar
Smith, R. L. (1979) Limit theorems for the reliability of series-parallel load-sharing systems. Technical Report No. 424, Cornell University.Google Scholar