Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:34:48.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Berry-Esseen bound for the Poisson shot-noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

John A. Lane
John A. Lane*
Affiliation:
University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics, The University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, SY23 3BZ, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This note provides a useful extension of the Berry–Esseen bound on the error in the normal approximation for shot-noise. The special cases treated are of particular interest in the statistical analysis of Poisson processes and cluster point processes.

Keywords

POISSON PROCESSCLUSTER POINT PROCESSES
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 512 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1987 

References

Heinrich, L. and Schmidt, V. (1985) Normal convergence of multidimensional shot-noise and rates of this convergence. Adv. Appl. Prob. 17, 709–730.Google Scholar
Krickeberg, K. (1982) Processus Ponctuels en Statistique. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 929, 206–313. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lane, J. A. (1979) Some Limit Theorems for Shot-noise Processes. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Lane, J. A. (1984) The central limit theorem for the Poisson shot-noise process. J. Appl. Prob. 21, 287–301.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. and Scott, E. L. (1958) Statistical approach to the problems of cosmology. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 20, 1–43.Google Scholar
Papoulis, A. (1971) High density shot-noise and gaussianity. J. Appl. Prob. 8, 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vere-Jones, D. (1970) Stochastic models for earthquake occurrence. J.R. Statist. Soc. B 32, 1–62.Google Scholar