Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-pw477 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-26T10:08:45.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bankruptcy probabilities under non-poisson inspection

Part of: Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2025

Florine Kuipers ,
Michel Mandjes  and
Sara Morcy
Florine Kuipers*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Michel Mandjes*
Affiliation:
Leiden University, University of Amsterdam
Sara Morcy*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
*Postal address: Boston Consulting Group, Gustav Mahlerlaan 40, 1082 MC Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
**Postal address: Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9512, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
***Postal address: University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper concerns an insurance firm’s surplus process observed at renewal inspection times, with a focus on assessing the probability of the surplus level dropping below zero. For various types of inter-inspection time distributions, an explicit expression for the corresponding transform is given. In addition, Cramér–Lundberg-type asymptotics are established. Also, an importance sampling-based Monte Carlo algorithm is proposed, and is shown to be logarithmically efficient.

Keywords

Cramér–Lundberg modelperiodic inspectionlarge deviationsruin probabilityimportance sampling

MSC classification

Secondary: 62P05: Applications to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics
Type
Original Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , First View , pp. 1 - 40
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Applied Probability Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, J. and Whitt, W. Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms of probability distributions’. ORSA Journal on Computing 7 (1995), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecher, H., Cheung, E., and Thonhauser, S. Randomized observation periods for the compound Poisson risk model: the discounted penalty function. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (2013), 424–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecher, H., Gerber, H., and Shiu, E. The optimal dividend barrier in the Gamma–Omega model. European Actuarial Journal 1 (2011), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecher, H., Ivanovs, J., and Zhou, X. Exit identities for Lévy processes observed at Poisson arrival times. Bernoulli 22 (2016), 1364–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecher, H. and Lautscham, V. From ruin to bankruptcy for compound Poisson surplus processes. ASTIN Bulletin 43 (2013), 213–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecher, H. et al. A queueing model with randomized depletion of inventory. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 31 (2017), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asghari, N., den Iseger, P., and Mandjes, M. Numerical techniques in Lévy fluctuation theory. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 16 (2014), 31–52.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. (2003). Applied Probability and Queues, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S. and Albrecher, H. (2010). Ruin Probabilities. World Scientific, Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmussen, S. and Glynn, P. (2007). Stochastic Simulation: Algorithms and Analysis. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmussen, S. and Rosiński, J. Approximations of small jumps of Lévy processes with a view towards simulation. Journal of Applied Probability 38 (2001), 482–493.Google Scholar
Boxma, O., Essifi, R., and Janssen, A. A queueing/inventory and an insurance risk model. Advances in Applied Probability 48 (2016), 1139–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxma, O., Kella, O., and Mandjes, M. On fluctuation-theoretic decompositions via Lindley-type recursions. To appear in Stochastic Processes and their Applications (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxma, O. and Mandjes, M. A decomposition for Lévy processes inspected at Poisson moments. Journal of Applied Probability 60 (2023), 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxma, O. and Mandjes, M. Affine storage and insurance risk models. Mathematics of Operations Research 46 (2021), 1282–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinescu, C. et al. A ruin model with a resampled environment. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (2020), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Auria, B. et al. First passage of a Markov additive process and generalized Jordan chains. Journal of Applied Probability 47 (2010), 1048–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dębicki, K. and Mandjes, M. (2015). Queues and Lévy Fluctuation Theory. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, G. and Mandjes, M. A transient Cramér–Lundberg model with applications to credit risk. Journal of Applied Probability 58 (2021), 721–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieker, A. and Mandjes, M. Extremes of Markov-additive processes with one-sided jumps, with queueing applications. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 13 (2011), 221–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, R. Hitting probabilities for spectrally positive Lévy processes. Journal of the London Mathematical Society 44 (1991), 566–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Iseger, P. Numerical transform inversion using Gaussian quadrature. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 20 (2006), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanovs, J., Boxma, O., and Mandjes, M. Singularities of the matrix exponent of a Markov additive process with one-sided jumps. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 120 (2010), 1776–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korshunov, D. On distribution tail of the maximum of a random walk. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 72 (1997), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kreveld, L., Mandjes, M., and Dorsman, J.-P. Cramér-Lundberg asymptotics for spectrally positive Markov additive processes. To appear in Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kreveld, L., Mandjes, M., and Dorsman, J.-P. Extreme value analysis for a Markov additive process driven by a nonirreducible background chain. Stochastic Systems 12 (2022), 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, A. et al. A flexible and optimal approach for appointment scheduling in healthcare. Decision Sciences 54 (2023), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyprianou, A. (2006). Introductory Lectures on Fluctuations of Lévy Processes with Applications. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Landriault, D., Renaud, J.-F., and Zhou, X. An insurance risk model with Parisian implementation delays. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 16 (2014), 583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeffen, R., Czarna, I., and Palmowski, Z. Parisian ruin probability for spectrally negative Lévy processes. Bernoulli 19 (2013), 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandjes, M. and Boxma, O. (2023). The Cramér-Lundberg Model and its Variants – A Queueing Perspective. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, N. (1998). Stochastic Storage Processes – Queues, Insurance Risk, and Dams, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tijms, H. (1986). Stochastic Modelling and Analysis – A Computational Approach. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Xie, J. et al. Gerber-Shiu analysis in the compound Poisson model with constant inter-observation times. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 37 (2023), 324–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Cheung, E., and Yang, H. Lévy insurance risk process with Poissonian taxation. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (2017), 51–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar