Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:10:36.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of sex in random environments, I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

W. G. S. Hines  and
W. S. Moore
W. G. S. Hines*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
W. S. Moore*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada NIG 2W1. Research supported by NSERC Operating Grant A6187.
∗∗Postal address: Department of Biological Sciences, College of Liberal Arts, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model of the effects of random variations in environment upon reproductive fitness of sexual and asexual members of a population is analyzed, using individual selection arguments. Conditions are found under which sexuality does result in a net selective advantage, with the conditions per locus becoming markedly less severe as the number of loci considered increases.

Keywords

ASEXUAL ADVANTAGERANDOM ENVIRONMENTSCOST OF MEIOSISGEOMETRIC OVERDOMINANCESEXUALITY/ASEXUALITY
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1981 , pp. 453 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Research supported by NSF Operating Grant DEB 7715352.

References

Crow, J. F. and Kimura, M. (1965) Evolution in sexual and asexual populations. Amer. Natur. 99, 439–450.Google Scholar
Dempster, E. R. (1955) Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D., Henderson, P. A. and Moran, N. A. (1980) Fluctuation of environment and coevolved antagonist polymorphism as factors in the maintenance of sex. In Natural Selection and Social Behaviour, ed. Alexander, R. D., and Tinkle, D. W., Chiron Press, New York.Google Scholar
Karlin, S. and Levikson, B. (1974) Temporal variation in selection intensities: Case of small populations. Theoret. Popn Biol. 6, 383–412.Google Scholar
Karlin, S. and Lieberman, U. (1974) Temporal variation in selection intensities: Case of large populations. Theoret. Popn Biol. 6, 355–382.Google Scholar
Levikson, B. and Karlin, S. (1975) Random temporal variation in selection intensities acting on infinite diploid populations: Diffusion method analysis. Theoret. Popn Biol. 8, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard Smith, J. (1978) The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moore, W. S. and Hines, W. G. S. (1981) Sex in random environments. J. Theoret. Biol. Google Scholar
Muller, H. (1932) Some genetic aspects of sex. Amer. Natur. 66, 118–138.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1975) Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar