Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:16:25.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Admission Control for Multidimensional Workload input with Heavy Tails and Fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process

Part of: Stochastic processes Operations research and management science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2016

Amarjit Budhiraja ,
Vladas Pipiras  and
Xiaoming Song
Amarjit Budhiraja*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
Vladas Pipiras*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
Xiaoming Song*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics and OR, University of North Carolina, Hanes Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics and OR, University of North Carolina, Hanes Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics and OR, University of North Carolina, Hanes Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The infinite source Poisson arrival model with heavy-tailed workload distributions has attracted much attention, especially in the modeling of data packet traffic in communication networks. In particular, it is well known that under suitable assumptions on the source arrival rate, the centered and scaled cumulative workload input process for the underlying processing system can be approximated by fractional Brownian motion. In many applications one is interested in the stabilization of the work inflow to the system by modifying the net input rate, using an appropriate admission control policy. In this paper we study a natural family of admission control policies which keep the associated scaled cumulative workload input asymptotically close to a prespecified linear trajectory, uniformly over time. Under such admission control policies and with natural assumptions on arrival distributions, suitably scaled and centered cumulative workload input processes are shown to converge weakly in the path space to the solution of a d-dimensional stochastic differential equation driven by a Gaussian process. It is shown that the admission control policy achieves moment stabilization in that the second moment of the solution to the stochastic differential equation (averaged over the d-stations) is bounded uniformly for all times. In one special case of control policies, as time approaches ∞, we obtain a fractional version of a stationary Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process that is driven by fractional Brownian motion with Hurst parameter H > ½.

Keywords

Poisson random measureGaussian random measureself-similarityheavy-tailed distributionfractional Brownian motionfractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processadmission control

MSC classification

Primary: 60G18: Self-similar processes 60G57: Random measures
Secondary: 60G15: Gaussian processes 90B15: Network models, stochastic
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 476 - 505
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Alòs, E., Mazet, O. and Nualart, D. (2001). “Stochastic calculus with respect to Gaussian processes.” Ann. Prob. 29, 766–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, S. N. and Kurtz, T. G. (1986). “Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence. John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, D., Resnick, S. and Samorodnitsky, G. (1998). “Heavy tails and long range dependence in ON/OFF processes and associated fluid models.” Math. Operat. Res. 23, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaj, I. and Taqqu, M. S. (2008). “Convergence to fractional Brownian motion and to the Telecom process: the integral representation approach.“In In and out of Equilibrium, 2 (Progress. Prob. 60), Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 383–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstantopoulos, T. and Lin, S.-J. (1998). “Macroscopic models for long-range dependent network traffic.” Queueing Systems Theory Appl. 28, 215–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, T. G., Kelly, F. P., Zachary, S. and Ziedins, I. (1996). “Limit theorems for workload input models.“In Stochastic Networks, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 119–140.Google Scholar
Leland, W. E., Taqqu, M. S., Willinger, W. and Wilson, D. V. (1994). “On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic (extended version).” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 2, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikosch, T., Resnick, S., Rootzén, H. and Stegeman, A. (2002). “Is network traffic approximated by stable Lévy motion or fractional Brownian motion.” Ann. Appl. Prob. 12, 23–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nualart, D. (2006). “The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pipiras, V., Taqqu, M. S. and Levy, J. B. (2004). “Slow, fast and arbitrary growth conditions for renewal-reward processes when both the renewals and the rewards are heavy-tailed.” Bernoulli 10, 121–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protter, P. E. (2004). “Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations (Appl. Math. (New York) 21).“Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Samorodnitsky, G. and Taqqu, M. S. (1994). “Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes: Stochastic Models with Infinite Variance. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Young, L. C. (1936). “An inequality of the Hölder type, connected with Stieltjes integration.” Acta Math. 67, 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zähle, M. (1998). “Integration with respect to fractal functions and stochastic calculus. I.” Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 111, 333–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar