Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Gates, D.J.
1980.
Competition between two types of plants with specified neighbor configurations.
Mathematical Biosciences,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
195.
Tautu, Petre
1980.
Biological Growth and Spread.
Vol. 38,
Issue. ,
p.
196.
Gates, D.J.
1980.
Competition between two types of plants located at random on a lattice.
Mathematical Biosciences,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
157.
Gates, David J.
and
Westcott, Mark
1981.
Negative skewness and negative correlations in spatial competition models.
Journal of Mathematical Biology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
159.
Gates, D.J.
1982.
Competition and skewness in plantations.
Journal of Theoretical Biology,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 4,
p.
909.
Liu, Jiping
and
Burkhart, Harold E.
1993.
Dynamics of size-variable distribution parameters in juvenile loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stands.
Forest Ecology and Management,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
321.
Berger, Uta
and
Hildenbrandt, Hanno
2000.
A new approach to spatially explicit modelling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees.
Ecological Modelling,
Vol. 132,
Issue. 3,
p.
287.
Weiner, J.
Stoll, P.
Muller‐Landau, H.
and
Jasentuliyana, A.
2001.
The Effects of Density, Spatial Pattern, and Competitive Symmetry on Size Variation in Simulated Plant Populations.
The American Naturalist,
Vol. 158,
Issue. 4,
p.
438.
BERGER, UTA
HILDENBRANDT, HANNO
and
GRIMM, VOLKER
2002.
TOWARDS A STANDARD FOR THE INDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODELING OF PLANT POPULATIONS: SELF‐THINNING AND THE FIELD‐OF‐NEIGHBORHOOD APPROACH.
Natural Resource Modeling,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Damgaard, Christian
2004.
Modelling individual plant growth at a variable mean density or at a specific spatial setting.
Comptes Rendus Biologies,
Vol. 327,
Issue. 3,
p.
255.
Feagin, Rusty A.
and
Wu, X. Ben
2005.
An experimental approach for quantifying the spatial interactions of plants under different treatment conditions.
Écoscience,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
44.
Feagin, R.A.
Wu, X.B.
Smeins, F.E.
Whisenant, S.G.
and
Grant, W.E.
2005.
Individual versus community level processes and pattern formation in a model of sand dune plant succession.
Ecological Modelling,
Vol. 183,
Issue. 4,
p.
435.
Weiner, Jacob
and
Damgaard, Christian
2006.
Size‐asymmetric competition and size‐asymmetric growth in a spatially explicit zone‐of‐influence model of plant competition.
Ecological Research,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 5,
p.
707.
Malkinson, D.
and
Kadmon, R.
2007.
Vegetation dynamics along a disturbance gradient: Spatial and temporal perspectives.
Journal of Arid Environments,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 1,
p.
127.
Lv, Qiming
Schneider, Manuel K.
and
Pitchford, Jonathan W.
2008.
Individualism in plant populations: Using stochastic differential equations to model individual neighbourhood-dependent plant growth.
Theoretical Population Biology,
Vol. 74,
Issue. 1,
p.
74.
Bartelheimer, Maik
Steinlein, Thomas
and
Beyschlag, Wolfram
2008.
15N-nitrate-labelling demonstrates a size symmetric competitive effect on belowground resource uptake.
Plant Ecology,
Vol. 199,
Issue. 2,
p.
243.
Damgaard, Christian
Riis-Nielsen, Torben
and
Schmidt, Inger Kappel
2009.
Estimating plant competition coefficients and predicting community dynamics from non-destructive pin-point data: a case study with Calluna vulgaris and Deschampsia flexuosa.
Plant Ecology,
Vol. 201,
Issue. 2,
p.
687.
Chen, ShuYan
Zhang, JiaLin
Jia, Peng
Xu, Jin
Wang, Gang
and
Xiao, Sa
2010.
Effects of size variation and spatial structure on plastic response of plant height to light competition.
Chinese Science Bulletin,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 12,
p.
1135.
Schiffers, Katja
Tielbörger, Katja
Tietjen, Britta
and
Jeltsch, Florian
2011.
Root plasticity buffers competition among plants: theory meets experimental data.
Ecology,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 3,
p.
610.
Jia, Xin
Dai, Xin‐Feng
Shen, Zhu‐Xia
Zhang, Jun‐Yan
and
Wang, Gen‐Xuan
2011.
Facilitation can maintain clustered spatial pattern of plant populations during density‐dependent mortality: insights from a zone‐of‐influence model.
Oikos,
Vol. 120,
Issue. 3,
p.
472.