Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:19:15.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification and isotropy characterization of deformed random fields through excursion sets

Part of: Inference from stochastic processes Geometric probability and stochastic geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

Julie Fournier
Julie Fournier*
Affiliation:
Université Paris Descartes and Sorbonne Université
*
* Postal address: MAP5 UMR CNRS 8145, Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France. Email address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A deterministic application θ:ℝ2→ℝ2 deforms bijectively and regularly the plane and allows the construction of a deformed random field X∘θ:ℝ2→ℝ from a regular, stationary, and isotropic random field X:ℝ2→ℝ. The deformed field X∘θ is, in general, not isotropic (and not even stationary), however, we provide an explicit characterization of the deformations θ that preserve the isotropy. Further assuming that X is Gaussian, we introduce a weak form of isotropy of the field X∘θ, defined by an invariance property of the mean Euler characteristic of some of its excursion sets. We prove that deformed fields satisfying this property are strictly isotropic. In addition, we are able to identify θ, assuming that the mean Euler characteristic of excursion sets of X∘θ over some basic domain is known.

Keywords

Random fieldspace deformationexcursion setEuler characteristicisotropy

MSC classification

Primary: 62M30: Spatial processes
Secondary: 62M40: Random fields; image analysis 60D05: Geometric probability and stochastic geometry
Type
Original Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 706 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Adler, R. J. and Taylor, J. E. (2007). Random Fields and Geometry. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[2]Allard, D., Senoussi, R. and Porcu, E. (2016). Anisotropy models for spatial data. Math. Geosci. 48, 305–328.Google Scholar
[3]Anderes, E. and Chatterjee, S. (2009). Consistent estimates of deformed isotropic Gaussian random fields on the plane. Ann. Statist. 37, 2324–2350.Google Scholar
[4]Anderes, E. and Guinness, J. (2016). A generalized quadratic estimate for random field nonstationarity. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.03496.Google Scholar
[5]Anderes, E. B. and Stein, M. L. (2008). Estimating deformations of isotropic Gaussian random fields on the plane. Ann. Statist. 36, 719–741.Google Scholar
[6]Berzin, C. (2018). Estimation of local anisotropy based on level sets. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03760.Google Scholar
[7]Briant, M. and Fournier, J. (2017). Isotropic diffeomorphisms: solutions to a differential system for a deformed random fields study. Preprint. Available at https:arxiv.org/abs/1704.03737.Google Scholar
[8]Cabaña, E. M. (1987). Affine processes: a test of isotropy based on level sets. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 47, 886–891.Google Scholar
[9]Clerc, M. and Mallat, S. (2002). The texture gradient equation for recovering shape from texture. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 24, 536–549.Google Scholar
[10]Clerc, M. and Mallat, S. (2003). Estimating deformations of stationary processes. Ann. Statist. 31, 1772–1821.Google Scholar
[11]Di Bernardino, E., Estrade, A. and León, J. R. (2017). A test of Gaussianity based on the Euler characteristic of excursion sets. Electron. J. Statist. 11, 843–890.Google Scholar
[12]Estrade, A. and León, J. R. (2016). A central limit theorem for the Euler characteristic of a Gaussian excursion set. Ann. Prob. 44, 3849–3878.Google Scholar
[13]Fouedjio, F., Desassis, N. and Romary, T. (2015). Estimation of space deformation model for non-stationary random functions. Spatial Statist. 13, 45–61.Google Scholar
[14]Guyon, X. and Perrin, O. (2000). Identification of space deformation using linear and superficial quadratic variations. Statist. Prob. Lett. 47, 307–316.Google Scholar
[15]Hu, W. and Okamoto, T. (2002). Mass reconstruction with cosmic microwave background polarization. Astrophys. J. 574, 566–574.Google Scholar
[16]Lee, J. M. (2000). Introduction to Topological Manifolds. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[17]Perrin, O. and Meiring, W. (1999). Identifiability for non-stationary spatial structure. J. Appl. Prob. 36, 1244–1250.Google Scholar
[18]Perrin, O. and Senoussi, R. (2000). Reducing non-stationary random fields to stationarity and isotropy using a space deformation. Statist. Prob. Lett. 48, 23–32.Google Scholar
[19]Sampson, P. D. and Guttorp, P. (1992). Nonparametric estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87, 108–119.Google Scholar