Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:02:03.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homogeneous Gaussian Markov processes on general lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Fumiyasu Komaki*
Affiliation:
Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo
*
* Postal address: The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 4-6-7 Minami-Azabu Minato-ku, Tokyo 106, Japan.

Abstract

A homogeneous Gaussian Markov lattice-process model has a regression coefficient that determines the extent to which a random variable of a vertex is dependent on those of the neighbors. In many studies, the absolute value of this parameter has been assumed to be less than the reciprocal of the number of neighbors. This condition is shown to be necessary and sufficient for the existence of the Gaussian process satisfying the model equations under some assumptions on lattices using the notion of dual processes. We also give examples of models that neither satisfy the condition imposed on the region for the parameter nor the assumptions on lattices. A formula for autocovariance functions of Gaussian Markov processes on general lattices is derived, and numerical procedures to calculate the autocovariance functions are proposed.

Type
General Applied Probability
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (1964) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Amit, Y. and Grenander, U. (1991) Comparing sweep strategies for stochastic relaxation. J. Multivar. Anal. 37, 197222.Google Scholar
Besag, J. E. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion) J. R. Statist. Soc. B 36, 192236.Google Scholar
Besag, J. E. (1975) Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. Statistician 24, 179195.Google Scholar
Besag, J. E. (1981) On a system of two-dimensional recurrence equations. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 43, 302309.Google Scholar
Besag, J. E. and Moran, P. A. P. (1975) On the estimation and testing of spatial interaction in Gaussian lattice processes. Biometrika 62, 555562.Google Scholar
Cressie, N. (1991) Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Grenander, U. and Rosenblatt, M. (1957) Statistical Analysis of Stationary Time Series. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hannan, E. J. (1970) Multiple Time Series. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Harary, F. (1971) Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Horiguchi, T. (1972) Lattice Green's functions for the triangular and honeycomb lattices. J. Math. Phys. 13, 14111419.Google Scholar
Katsura, S. and Inawashiro, S. (1971) Lattice Green's functions for the rectangular and the square lattices at arbitrary points, J. Math. Phys. 12, 16221630.Google Scholar
Kiiveri, H. T. and Campbell, N. A. (1989) Covariance models for lattice data. Austral. J. Statist. 31, 6277.Google Scholar
Moran, P. A. P. (1973a) A Gaussian Markovian process on a square lattice. J. Appl. Prob. 10, 5462.Google Scholar
Moran, P. A. P. (1973b) Necessary conditions for Markovian process on a lattice. J. Appl. Prob. 10, 605612.Google Scholar
Ripley, B. D. (1981) Spatial Statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Ripley, B. D. (1988) Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rozanov, Ju. A. (1967) Gaussian fields with given conditional distributions. Theory Prob. Appl. 12, 381391.Google Scholar
Rozanov, Ju. A. (1982) Markov Random Fields. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S. (1962) Matrix Iterative Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Whittle, P. (1954) On stationary processes in the plane. Biometrika 41, 434449.Google Scholar