Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:33:58.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of the directional measure of planar random sets by digitization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Markus Kiderlen*
Affiliation:
University of Karlsruhe
Eva B. Vedel Jensen*
Affiliation:
University of Aarhus
*
Postal address: Mathematical Institute II, University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany. Email address: [email protected]
∗∗ Postal address: Department of Theoretical Statistics, Institute of Mathematics, University of Aarhus, NY Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

Abstract

Estimation methods for the directional measure of a stationary planar random set Z, based only on discretized realizations of Z, are discussed. Properties of the discretized set that can be derived by comparing neighbouring grid points are used. Larger grid configurations of more than two grid points are considered. It is shown that the probabilities of observing the various types of configurations can be expressed in terms of the first contact distribution function of Z (with a finite structuring element). An important prerequisite result concerning deterministic dilation areas is also established. The inference on the mean normal measure based on 2×2 configurations is discussed in detail.

Type
Stochastic Geometry and Statistical Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Hug, D. and Last, G. (2000). On support measures in Minkowski spaces and contact distributions in stochastic geometry. Ann. Prob. 28, 796850.Google Scholar
[2] Hug, D., Last, G. and Weil, W. (2002). A survey on contact distribution functions. In Morphology of Condensed Matter (Lecture Notes Phys. 600), eds Mecke, K. R. and Stoyan, D., Springer, Berlin, pp. 317357.Google Scholar
[3] Kiderlen, M. (2002). Determination of the mean normal measure from isotropic means of flat sections. Adv. Appl. Prob. 34, 505519.Google Scholar
[4] Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical Models. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Matheron, G. (1967). Eléments Pour une Théorie des Milieux Poreux. Masson et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
[6] Matheron, G. (1974). Hyperplans poissoniens et compacts de Steiner. Adv. Appl. Prob. 6, 563579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Molchanov, I. S. (1997). Statistics of the Boolean Model for Practitioners and Mathematicians. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
[8] Ohser, J. and Mücklich, F. (2000). Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Material Science. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[9] Ohser, J., Steinbach, B. and Lang, C. (1998). Efficient texture analysis of binary images. J. Microscopy 192, 2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Rataj, J. (1996). Estimation of oriented direction distribution of a planar body. Adv. Appl. Prob. 28, 394404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Rataj, J. (2003). On the set covariance and three-point test sets. To appear in Czech. Math. J. Google Scholar
[12] Schneider, R. (1993). Convex Bodies: the Brunn–Minkowski Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[13] Schneider, R. and Weil, W. (2000). Stochastische Geometrie. Teubner, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
[14] Serra, J. (1982). Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
[15] Weil, W. (1997). Mean bodies associated with random closed sets. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) Suppl. 50, 387412.Google Scholar
[16] Weil, W. (1997). The mean normal distribution of stationary random sets and particle processes. In Proc. Internat. Symp. Adv. Theory Appl. Random Sets (Fontainebleau, October 1996), ed. Jeulin, D., World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 2133.Google Scholar