Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:08:00.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Double-Passage Shape Correction Method for Predictions of Unsteady Flow and Aeroelasticity in Turbomachinery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2017

Tongqing Guo ,
Di Zhou  and
Zhiliang Lu
Tongqing Guo*
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China
Di Zhou*
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China
Zhiliang Lu*
Affiliation:
College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email:[email protected] (T. Q. Guo), [email protected] (D. Zhou), [email protected] (Z. L. Lu)
*Corresponding author. Email:[email protected] (T. Q. Guo), [email protected] (D. Zhou), [email protected] (Z. L. Lu)
*Corresponding author. Email:[email protected] (T. Q. Guo), [email protected] (D. Zhou), [email protected] (Z. L. Lu)
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, a double-passage shape correction (DPSC) method is presented for simulation of unsteady flows around vibrating blades and aeroelastic prediction. Based on the idea of phase-lagged boundary conditions, the shape correction method was proposed aimed at efficiently dealing with unsteady flow problems in turbomachinery. However, the original single-passage shape correction (SPSC) may show the disadvantage of slow convergence of unsteady solutions and even produce nonphysical oscillation. The reason is found to be related with the disturbances on the circumferential boundaries that can not be damped by numerical schemes. To overcome these difficulties, the DPSC method is adopted here, in which the Fourier coefficients are computed from flow variables at implicit boundaries instead of circumferential boundaries in the SPSC method. This treatment actually reduces the interaction between the calculation of Fourier coefficients and the update of flow variables. Therefore a faster convergence speed could be achieved and also the solution stability is improved. The present method is developed to be suitable for viscous and turbulent flows. And for real three-dimensional (3D) problems, the rotating effects are also considered. For validation, a 2D oscillating turbine cascade, a 3D oscillating flat plate cascade and a 3D practical transonic fan rotor are investigated. Comparisons with experimental data or other solutions and relevant discussions are presented in detail. Numerical results show that the solution accuracy of DPSC method is favorable and at least comparable to the SPSC method. However, fewer iteration cycles are needed to get a converged and stable unsteady solution, which greatly improves the computational efficiency.

Keywords

Double passageshape correctionFourier transformationunsteady flowaeroelasticityvibrating bladesturbomachinery

MSC classification

Secondary: 65Z05: Applications to physics
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 839 - 860
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Carta, F. O., Coupled blade-disk-shroud flutter instabilities in turbojet engine rotors, J. Eng. Power, 89 (1967), pp. 419–427.Google Scholar
[2] Bendiksen, O. O., Aeroelastic problems in turbomachines, 31st Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference; 1990; Los Angles, California; Reston: AIAA, (1990), pp. 1736–1761.Google Scholar
[3] Kersken, H. P., Frey, C., Voigt, C. and Ashcroft, G., Time-linearized and time-accurate 3D RANS methods for aeroelastic analysis in turbomachinery, J. Turbomach., 134(5) (2012), 051024.Google Scholar
[4] Srivastava, R. and Reddy, T. S. R., Comparative study of coupled-mode flutter-analysis methods for fan configurations, J. Propul. Power, 15(3) (1999), pp. 447–453.Google Scholar
[5] Tran, D. M., Liauzun, C. and Labste, C., Methods of fluidstructure coupling in frequency and time domain using linearized aerodynamics for turbomachinery, J. Fluid. Strut., 17 (2003), pp. 1161–1180.Google Scholar
[6] Carstens, V. and Belz, J., Numerical investigation of nonlinear fluid-structure interaction invibrating compressor bldes, J. Turbomach., 123(2) (2000), pp. 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Zhou D, D., Lu, Z. L., Guo, T. Q. and Shen, E. N., Stall flutter computation of turbomachinery blade based on a CFD/CSD coupling method, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 36(4) (2014), pp. 1076–1085.Google Scholar
[8] Verdon, J. M. and Caspar, J. R., A linearized unsteady aerodynamic analysis for transonic cascades, J. Fluid. Mech., 149 (1984), pp. 403–429.Google Scholar
[9] Gerolymos, G. A., Numerical integration of blade-to-blade surface Euler equations in vibrating cascades, AIAA J., 26 (1988), pp. 82–91.Google Scholar
[10] Erdos, J. I. and Alzner, E., Computation of unsteady transonic flows through rotating andstationary cascades, NASA Contractor Report 2900, (1978).Google Scholar
[11] He, L., An Euler solution for unsteady flows around oscillating blades, J. Turbomach., 112(4) (1990), pp. 714–722.Google Scholar
[12] Srivastava, R., Bakhle, M. A., Keith, T. G. and Stefko, G. L., Phase-lagged boundary condition methods for aeroelastic analysis of turbomachines: a comparative study, ASME 1999 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition; 1999; Indianapolis, Indiana. New York: ASME; 1999.Google Scholar
[13] Li, H. D. and He, L., Single-passage analysis of unsteady flows around vibrating blades of a transonic fan under inlet distortion, J. Turbomach., 124(2) (2002), pp. 285–292.Google Scholar
[14] Im, H. S. and Zha, G. C., Prediction of a transonic rotor fluid/structure interaction with a traveling wave using a phase-lag boundary condition, 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition; 2013; Grapevine, Texas. Reston: AIAA; 2013.Google Scholar
[15] Giles, M. B., Calculation of unsteady wake/rotor interactions, J. Propul. Power, 4(4) (1988), pp. 356–362.Google Scholar
[16] He, L. and Ning, W., Efficient approach for analysis of unsteady viscous flows in turbomachines, AIAA J., 36(11) (1998), pp. 2005–2012.Google Scholar
[17] Li, H. D. and He, L., Single-passage solution of three-dimensional unsteady flows in a transonic fan rotor, J. Power Eng., 215 (2001), pp. 653–662.Google Scholar
[18] Giovannini, M., Marconcini, M., Arone, A. and Bertini, F., Evaluation of unsteady computational fluid dynamics models applied to the analysis of a transonic high-pressure turbine stage, J. Power Eng., 228 (2014), pp. 813–824.Google Scholar
[19] Spalart, P¸. R., Deck, S., Shur, M. L., Squires, K. D., Strelets, M. K. and Travin, A., A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities, Theory Comput. Fluid Dyn., 20(3) (2006), pp. 181–195.Google Scholar
[20] Ding, L., Lu, Z. L. and Guo, T. Q., An efficient dynamic mesh generation method for complex multi-block structured grid, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 6(1) (2014), pp. 120–134.Google Scholar
[21] Lane, F., System mode shapes in the flutter of compressor blade rows, Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences (Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences), 23(1) (1956), pp. 54–66.Google Scholar
[22] He, L., Modeling issues for computation of unsteady turbomachinery flows, VKI Lectures Series ”Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines”, 1996.Google Scholar
[23] Bölcs, A. and Fransson, T. H., Aeroelasticity in turbomachines-comparison of theoretical and experimental cascade results, Communication Du Laboratoire de Thermique Appliqu et de Turbomachines, 1986.Google Scholar
[24] Cinnela, P. et al., A numerical method for 3D turbomachinery aeroelasticity, ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea and Air; 2004; Vienna, Austria. New York: ASME; (2004), pp. 539–550.Google Scholar
[25] Sadeghi, M. and Liu, F., Computation of mistuning effects on cascade flutter, AIAA J., 39(1) (2001), pp. 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] He, L. and Denton, J. D., Three-dimensionaltime-marching inviscid and viscous solutions forunsteady flows around vibrating blades, J. Turbomach., 116(3) (1994), pp. 469–476.Google Scholar
[27] Namba, M. and Ishikawa, A., Three-Dimensional aerodynamic characteristics of oscillating supersonic and transonic annular cascades, J. Eng. Power, 105 (1983), pp. 138–146.Google Scholar
[28] Strazisar, A. J., Wood, J. R., Hathaway, M. D. and Surder, K. L., Laser anemometer measurements in a transonic axial-flow fan rotor, NASA TP 2879; (1989).Google Scholar
[29] Sanders, A. J., Hassan, K. K. and Rabe, D. C., Experimental and numerical study of stall flutter in a transonic low-aspect ratio fan blisk, J. Turbomach., 126(1) (2004), pp. 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar