Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:27:54.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Pseudo-Stokes Mesh Motion Algorithm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Luciano Gonçalves Noleto ,
Manuel N.D. Barcelos Jr.  and
Antonio C. P. Brasil Jr.
Luciano Gonçalves Noleto*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Brasília no Gama. Complexo de Educaçāo, Cultura, Esporte e Lazer. Área Especial de Indústria 1, Setor Leste, Faculdade Lote 1. Gama-DF, Brasil, 72.444-210
Manuel N.D. Barcelos Jr.*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Brasília no Gama. Complexo de Educaçāo, Cultura, Esporte e Lazer. Área Especial de Indústria 1, Setor Leste, Faculdade Lote 1. Gama-DF, Brasil, 72.444-210
Antonio C. P. Brasil Jr.*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Tecnologia, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Laboratório de Energia e Ambiente. Asa Norte. Brasília-DF, Brasil, 70.910-900
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This work presents a moving mesh methodology based on the solution of a pseudo flow problem. The mesh motion is modeled as a pseudo Stokes problem solved by an explicit finite element projection method. The mesh quality requirements are satisfied by employing a null divergent velocity condition. This methodology is applied to triangular unstructured meshes and compared to well known approaches such as the ones based on diffusion and pseudo structural problems. One of the test cases is an airfoil with a fully meshed domain. A specific rotation velocity is imposed as the airfoil boundary condition. The other test is a set of two cylinders that move toward each other. A mesh quality criteria is employed to identify critically distorted elements and to evaluate the performance of each mesh motion approach. The results obtained for each test case show that the pseudo-flow methodology produces satisfactory meshes during the moving process.

Keywords

76M1065M5035R37Moving boundariesmesh motion strategyfinite element projection methods
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 194 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Batchelor, G. K., An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
[2]Batina, J. T., Unsteady euler algorithm with unstructured dynamic mesh for complex-aircraft aerodynamic analysis, AIAA J., 29(3) (1991), pp. 327–333.Google Scholar
[3]Chadwick, P., Continuum Mechanics-Concise Theory and Problems, 1999.Google Scholar
[4]Chorin, A. J., Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, Math. Comput., 22 (1968), pp. 745–762.Google Scholar
[5]Codina, R. and Blasco, J., Stabilized finite element method for the transient Navier-Stokes equations based on a pressure gradient projection, Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 182(3-4) (2000), pp. 277–300.Google Scholar
[6]Degand, C. and Farhat, C., A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes, Comput. Struct., 80(3-4) (2002), pp. 305–316.Google Scholar
[7]Farhat, C. and Geuzaine, P., Design and analysis of robust ALE time-integrators for the solution of unsteady flow problems on moving grids, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 193(39-41) (2004), pp. 4073–4095.Google Scholar
[8]Farhat, C., Degand, C., Koobus, B. and Lesoinne, M., Improved method of spring analogy for dynamic unstructured fluid meshes, AIAA J., 4 (1998), pp. 3082–3091.Google Scholar
[9]Farhat, C., Degand, C., Koobus, B. and Lesoinne, M., Torsional springs for two-dimensional dynamic unstructured fluid meshes, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 163(1-4) (1988), pp. 231–245.Google Scholar
[10]Farhat, C., Geuzaine, P. and Grandmont, C., The discrete geometric conservation law and the nonlinear stability of ALE schemes for the solution of flow problems on moving grids, J. Comput. Phys., 174(2) (2001), pp. 669–694.Google Scholar
[11]Farhat, C., van der Zee, K.G. and Geuzaine, P., Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity, Comput. Methods Appl Mech. Eng., 195(17-18) (2006), pp. 1973–2001.Google Scholar
[12]Graebel, W. P., Advanced Fluid Mechanics, Academic Press, 2007.Google Scholar
[13]Guermond, J. and Quartapelle, L., Calculation of incompressible viscous flows by an unconditionally stable projection FEM, J. Comput. Phys., 132(1) (1997), pp. 12–33.Google Scholar
[14]Guermond, J., Minev, P. and Shen, J., An overview of projection methods for incompressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 195(44-47) (2006), pp. 6011–6045.Google Scholar
[15]Jasak, H. and Tukovic, C., Automatic mesh motion for the unstructured finite volume method, Trans. Famena, 30(2) (2006), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
[16]Johnson, A. and Tezduyar, T. E., Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 119(1-2) (1994), pp. 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Kamakoti, R. and Shyy, W., Evaluation of geometric conservation law using pressure-based fluid solver and moving grid technique, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 14(7) (2004), pp. 849–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Lai, M., Krempl, E. and Ruben, D., Introduction to Continuum Mechanics, 4th edn, 2009.Google Scholar
[19]Lesoinne, M. and Farhat, C., Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes and their impact on aeroelastic computations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 134(1-2) (1996), pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
[20]Lohner, R. and Yang, C., Improved ALE mesh velocities for moving bodies, Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., 12(10) (1996), pp. 599–608.Google Scholar
[21]Masud, A., Effects of mesh motion on the stability and convergence of ALE based formulations for moving boundary flows, Comput. Mech., 38(4-5) (2006), pp. 430–439.Google Scholar
[22]Rypl, D., Sequential and Parallel Generation of Unstructured 3d Meshes, PhD thesis, Czech Technical University, 1998.Google Scholar
[23]Spencer, A. J. M., Continuum Mechanics, 1980.Google Scholar
[24]Sun, S., Chen, B., Liu, J. and Yuan, M., An efficient implementation scheme for the moving grid method based on Delaunay graph mapping, 2nd, International Symposium, American Institute of Physics, 2010.Google Scholar
[25]Codina, R., Houzeaux, G., Coppola-Owen, H. and Baiges, J., The fixed-mesh ALE approach for the numerical approximation of flows in moving domains, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2008), pp. 1591–1611.Google Scholar
[26]Compere, G., Remacle, J. F., Jansson, J. and Hoffman, J., A mesh adaptation framework for dealing with large deforming meshes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 82 (2010), pp. 843–867.Google Scholar
[27]Darbandi, M. and Fouladi, N., A reduced domain strategy for local mesh movement application in unstructured grids, Appl. Numer. Math., 61 (2011), pp. 1001–1016.Google Scholar
[28]Liu, X., Qin, N. and Xia, H., Fast dynamic grid deformation based on Delaunay graph mapping, J. Comput. Phys., 211 (2006), pp. 405–423.Google Scholar
[29]Luke, E., Collins, E. and Blades, E., A fast mesh deformation method using explicit interpolation, J. Comput. Phys., in press, 2011.Google Scholar
[30]Dwight, R. P., Robust mesh deformation using the linear elasticity equations, Computational Fluid Dynamics 2006 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ICCFD4, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
[31]Rendall, T. C. S. and Allen, C. B., Efficient mesh motion using radial basis functions with data reduction algorithms, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), pp. 6231–6249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Rendall, T. C. S. and Allen, C. B., Reduced surface point selection options for efficient mesh deformation using radial basis functions, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), pp. 2810–2820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Baines, M. J., Hubbard, M.E. and Jimack, P. K., Velocity-based moving mesh methods for nonlinear partial differential equations, Commun. Comput. Phys., 10(3) (2011), pp. 509–576.Google Scholar
[34]Wick, T., Fluid-structure interactions using different mesh motion techniques, Comput. Struct., 89 (2011), pp. 1456–1467.Google Scholar