Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-m789k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-08T04:19:25.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological and agronomic assessment of a Variable Rate Irrigation system integrated with soil sensor technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

M. Martello ,
A. Berti ,
G. Lusiani ,
A. Lorigiola  and
F. Morari
M. Martello*
Affiliation:
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics Research – Center for Policies and Bioeconomy – Viale dell’Università, 14–35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
A. Berti
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and the Environment, University of Padova – Viale dell’Università, 16–35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
G. Lusiani
Affiliation:
Agenzia Veneta per i Pagamenti in Agricoltura via Niccolò Tommaseo 67/C – 35131 Padova (PD), Italy
A. Lorigiola
Affiliation:
Agenzia Veneta per i Pagamenti in Agricoltura via Niccolò Tommaseo 67/C – 35131 Padova (PD), Italy
F. Morari
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and the Environment, University of Padova – Viale dell’Università, 16–35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
*
†Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The main goal of this study was assessing the technological and agronomic performances of a centre pivot Variable Rate Irrigation (VRI) system. The study was conducted in 2015 on a 16-ha field cultivated with maize. Irrigation was scheduled in three Management Zones according to data provided by a real-time monitoring system based on an array of soil moisture sensors. First results demonstrated the potential benefits of the VRI system on irrigation performance however a multiyear comparison is requested for evaluating the response to climate variability. VRI resulted in yields comparable to the business-as-usual regime but through a noticeable reduction in irrigation volumes.

Keywords

IrrigationWater Use EfficiencyRemote sensingVariable Rate IrrigationCentre Pivot
Type
Precision Irrigation
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 564 - 568
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASABE 2001. Test procedure for determining the uniformity of water distribution of center pivot and lateral move irrigation machines equipped with spray of sprinkler nozzles. ANSI/ASABE Standars S436.1. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, St. Joseph, MI, USA.Google Scholar
Burt, CM, Clemmens, AJ, Strelkoff, TS, Solomon, KH, Bliesner, RD, Hardy, LA, Howell, TA and Eisenhauer, DE 1997. Irrigation performance measures efficiency and uniformity. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 123, 423–442.Google Scholar
Chiericati, M, Morari, F, Sartori, L, Ortiz, B, Perry, C and Vellidis, G 2007. Delineating management zones to apply site-specific irrigation in the Venice lagoon watershed. In Stafford, JV (Ed.), Precision Agriculture ‘07. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 599–606.Google Scholar
Dukes, MD and Perry, C 2006. Uniformity testing of variable-rate center pivot irrigation control systems. Precision Agriculture 7, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, RG, LaRue, J, Stone, KC and King, BA 2013. Adoption of site-specific variable rate sprinkler irrigation systems. Irrigation Science 31, 871–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridgen, JJ, Kithcen, NR, Sudduth, KA, Drummond, ST, Wiebold, WJ and Fraisse, CW 2004. Software MZA: software for subfield management zone delineation. Agricultural Journal 96, 100–108.Google Scholar
Howell, TA 2003. Irrigation efficiency. In: Stewart BA and Howell TA (eds), Encyclopedia of water science. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA. pp. 467–472.Google Scholar
Kim, Y, Evans, RG and Iversen, WM 2008. Remote sensing and control of an irrigation system using a distributed wireless sensor network, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 (7), 1379–1387.Google Scholar
Liakos, V, Vellidis, G, Tucker, M, Lowrance, C and Liang, X 2015. A decision support tool for managing precision irrigation with center pivots. In: JV Stafford (Ed.), Precision Agriculture ‘15 – Papers Presented the 10th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (10ECPA), Tel Aviv, Israel, pp. 677–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levidow, L, Zaccaria, D, Maia, R, Vivas, E, Todorovic, M and Scardigno, A 2014. Improving water-efficient irrigation: Prospects and difficulties of innovative practices. Agricultural Water Management 146, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, SA, Urrego, YF, Evett, SR and Colaizzi, PD 2013. Assessing application uniformity of a variable rate irrigation system in a windy location. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 29 (4), 497–510.Google Scholar
Topp, GC, Davis, JL and Annan, AP 1980. Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content: Measurements in Coaxial Transmission Lines. Water Resour. Res. 16, 574–582.Google Scholar
Vellidis, G, Liakos, V, Porter, W, Tucker, M and Liang, X 2016. A Dynamic Variable Rate Irrigation System. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Precision Agriculture July 31 – August 3, 2016, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,International Society of Precision Agriculture, Monticello, IL USA.Google Scholar
Zhang, C and Kovacs, J 2012. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precision Agriculture 13, 693–712.Google Scholar