Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:01:48.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Optical Yield Monitor for Peanuts – Proof of Concept and Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

E. Porter ,
G. Vellidis ,
V. Liakos ,
W. Porter  and
B. Branch
E. Porter*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, Tifton, Georgia, USA
G. Vellidis
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Sciences Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA
V. Liakos
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Sciences Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA
W. Porter
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Sciences Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA
B. Branch
Affiliation:
Kelley Manufacturing Co., Tifton, Georgia, USA
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Peanut (Arachis Hypogea) is one of the few major agronomic crops for which a yield monitor is not commercially available. This paper describes an ongoing project whose long-term goal is to adapt an optical sensor originally developed for cotton yield monitoring for use as a peanut yield monitor (PYM). The immediate objective of the work reported here was to evaluate the PYM under harvest conditions typical in southern Georgia, USA. The PYM consists of two mass-flow sensors, a data acquisition system, and a DGPS receiver. The PYM was evaluated on three fields totaling 29 ha during the 2016 harvest season. Percent error between the scale load and calculated load was 2% or better for the first field tested, but increased greatly for subsequent fields that were tested, most likely caused by damage to the sensor lens from the impact of pebbles.

Keywords

yield monitorpeanutoptical
Type
Crop Sensors and Sensing
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 199 - 203
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birrell, SJ and Borgelt, SC 1995. Crop yield mapping: Comparison of yield monitors and mapping techniques. In Site–Specific Management for Agricultural Systems, 15–31. Madison, Wisc, USA: ASA–CSSA–SSSA.Google Scholar
Durrence, JS, Thomas, DL, Perry, CD and Vellidis, G 1999b. Preliminary evaluation of commercial cotton yield monitors: The 1998 season in South Georgia. In Proc. 1999 Beltwide Cotton Conference, 366–373. Orlando, Fla. Memphis, Tenn.: National Cotton Council.Google Scholar
Perry, CD, Durrence, JS, Thomas, DL, Vellidis, G, Sobolik, CJ and Dzubak, A 1998a. Evaluation of commercial cotton yield monitors in Georgia field conditions. In Proc. 1998 Conference on Precision Farming Part B: 1227–1240. Minneapolis, Minn. Madison, Wisc.: ASA–CSSA–SSSA.Google Scholar
Porter, WM, Ward, J, Kirk, KR, Taylor, RK, Fravel, JB and Godsey, CB 2013. Application of an Ag Leader cotton yield monitor for measuring peanut yield: a multi-state investigation. ASABE Paper No. 13-1596295. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE.Google Scholar
Porter, WM, Taylor, RK and Godsey, CB 2012. Application of an AgLeader cotton yield monitor for measuring peanut yield. ASABE Paper No. 12-1338357. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE.Google Scholar
Rains, GC, Perry, CD and Vellidis, G 2005. Adaptation and testing of the Ag Leader® cotton yield sensor on a peanut combine. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 21 (6), 979–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, SW, Schueller, JK, Bae, YH, Borgelt, SC and Stout, BA 1989. Mapping of spatially variable yield during grain combining. Transactions of the ASAE 32 (3), 826–829.Google Scholar
Stafford, JV, Ambler, B and Smith, MP 1991. Sensing and mapping grain yield variation. In Automated Agriculture for the 21st Century, 356–365. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.Google Scholar
Thomasson, JA and Sui, R 2000. Advanced optical cotton yield monitor. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, ed. DA Richter 408–410. Memphis, Tenn.: Nat. Cotton Council Am.Google Scholar
Thomasson, JA and Sui, R 2003. Mississippi cotton yield monitor: Three years of field test results. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 19 (6), 631–636.Google Scholar
Thomasson, JA and Sui, R 2004. Optical-reflectance-based mass-flow sensor. Patent no. 6809,821. Washington, D.C.: USPTO.Google Scholar
Thomasson, JA, Sui, R, Wright, GC and Robson, AJ 2006. Optical peanut yield monitor: development and testing. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 22 (6), 809–818.Google Scholar
Vellidis, G, Perry, CD, Durrence, JS, Thomas, DL, Hill, RW, Kvien, CK, Hamrita, TK and Rains, G 2001. The peanut yield monitoring system. Transactions of the ASAE 44 (4), 775–785.Google Scholar