Abergel, F. and Temam, R. (1990), ‘On some control problems in fluid mechanics’, Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auchmuty, G., Dean, E.J., Glowinski, R. and Zhang, S.C. (1987), ‘Control methods for the numerical computation of periodic solutions of autonomous differential equations’, in Control Problems for Systems Described by Partial Differential Equations and Applications (Lasiecka, I. and Triggiani, R., eds.) Lecture Notes in Control and Information, vol. 97, Springer (Berlin) 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamberger, A. (1977), private communication.Google Scholar

Bardos, C., Lebeau, G. and Rauch, J. (1988), ‘Contrôle et stabilisation dans les problèmes hyperboliques’, in Contrôlabilité Exacte, Perturbation et Stabilisation de Systèmes Distribués, vol. 1 (Lions, J.L. (ed.), Masson (Paris) Appendix 2, 492–537.Google Scholar

Bardos, C. and Rauch, J. (1994), ‘Mathematical analysis of control-type numerical algorithms for the solution of the Helmholtz equation’. To appear.Google Scholar

Berggren, M. (1992), ‘Control and simulation of advection-diffusion systems’, MSc Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston.Google Scholar

Berggren, M. and Glowinski, R. (1995), ‘Numerical solution of some flow control problems’, Int. J. Fluid Dyn. To appear.Google Scholar

Bensoussan, A. (1990), Acta Appl. Math. 20, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourquin, F. (1993), ‘Approximation theory for the problem of exact controllability of the wave equation with boundary control, in Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation (Kleinman, R., Angell, Th., Colton, D., Santosa, F. and Stakgold, I., eds.) SIAM (Philadelphia, PA) 103–112.Google Scholar

Brezzi, F. and Fortin, M. (1991), Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods, Springer (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bristeau, M.O., Erhel, J., Glowinski, R. and Periaux, J. (1993), ‘A time dependent approach to the solution of the Helmholtz equation at high wave numbers’, in Proc. Sixth SIAM Conf. on Parallel Processing for Scientific Computing, (Sincovec, R.F., Keyes, D.E., Leuze, M.R., Petzold, L.R. and Reed, D.A., eds.) SIAM (Philadelphia, PA).Google Scholar

Bristeau, M.O., Glowinski, R. and Periaux, J. (1993a), ‘Scattering waves using exact controllability methods’, 31st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, AIAA Paper 93–0460.Google Scholar

Bristeau, M.O., Glowinski, R. and Periaux, J. (1993b), ‘Using exact controllability to solve the Helmholtz equation at high wave numbers’, in Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave propagation (Kleinman, R., Angell, Th., Colton, D., Santosa, F. and Stakgold, I., eds.) SIAM (Philadelphia, PA) 113–127.Google Scholar

Bristeau, M.O., Glowinski, R. and Periaux, J. (1993c), ‘Numerical simulation of high frequency scattering waves using exact controllability methods’, in Nonlinear Hyperbolic Problems: Theoretical, Applied, and Computational Aspects (Donato, A. and Oliveri, F., eds.) Notes in Numerical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 43, Vieweg (Branschweig) 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, J.A. and Kang, S. (1991), ‘A stabilization problem for Burgers' equation with unbounded control and observation’, International Series of Numerical Mathematics, vol. 100, Birkhauser (Basel).Google Scholar

Burns, J.A. and Marrekchi, H. (1993), ‘Optimal fixed-finite-dimensional compensator for Burgers' equation with unbounded input/output operators’, ICASE Report 93–19, ICASE.Google Scholar

Buschnell, D.M. and Hefner, J.N. (1990), Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Washington, DC).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carthel, C. (1994), ‘Numerical methods for the boundary controllability of the heat equation’, PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Houston.Google Scholar

Carthel, C., Glowinski, R. and Lions, J.L. (1994), ‘On exact and approximate boundary controllabilities for the heat equation: a numerical approach’, J. Opt. Theory Appl. 82, 3, 429–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiara, A. (1993), ‘Equation des ondes et régularité sur un ouvert lipschitzien’, C.R. Acad. Sci. I 316, 33–36.Google Scholar

Ciarlet, P.G. (1978), The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, North-Holland (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Ciarlet, P.G. (1989), Introduction to Numerical Linear Algebra and Optimization, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciarlet, P.G. (1990a), ‘A new class of variational problems arising in the modeling of elastic multi-structures’, Numer. Math. 57, 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciarlet, P.G. (1990b), Plates and Junctions in Elastic Multi-Structures: An Asymptotic Analysis, Masson (Paris).Google Scholar

Ciarlet, P.G. (1991), ‘Basic error estimates for elliptic problems’, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. II (Ciarlet, P.G. and Lions, J.L., eds.) North-Holland (Amsterdam) 17–351.Google Scholar

Ciarlet, P.G., Le Dret, H. and Nzengwa, R. (1989), ‘Junctions between three-dimensional and two-dimensional linearly elastic structures’, J. Math. Pures et Appl. 68, 261–295.Google Scholar

Crandall, M.G. and Lions, P.L. (1985), ‘Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions, Part I’, J. Funct. Anal. 62, 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crandall, M.G. and Lions, P.L. (1986a), ‘Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions, Part II’, J. Funct. Anal. 65, 368–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crandall, M.G. and Lions, P.L. (1986b), ‘Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions, Part III’, J. Funct. Anal. 68, 214–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crandall, M.G. and Lions, P.L. (1990), ‘Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions, Part IV’, J. Funct. Anal. 90, 237–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crandall, M.G. and Lions, P.L. (1991), ‘Hamilton-Jacobi equations in infinite dimensions, Part V’, J. Funct. Anal. 97, 417–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniel, J. (1970), The Approximate Minimization of Functionals, Prentice Hall (Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar

Dean, E.J. and Gubernatis, P. (1991), ‘Pointwise control of Burgers' equation – a numerical approach’, Comput. Math. Appl. 22, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, E.J., Glowinski, R. and Li, C.H. (1989), ‘Supercomputer solution of partial differential equation problems in computational fluid dynamics and in control’, Comput. Phys. Commun. 53, 401–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, J. and Schnabel, R.B. (1983), Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations, Prentice-Hall (Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar

Diaz, J.I. (1991), ‘Sobre la controlabilidad aproximada de problemas no lineales disipativos’, Jornadas Hispano-Francesas Sobre Control de Sistemas Distribuidos, Universidad de Malaga 41–48.Google Scholar

Diaz, J.I. and Fursikov, (1994), To appear.Google Scholar

Downer, J.D., Park, K.C. and Chiou, J.C. (1992), ‘Dynamics of flexible beams for multibody systems: a computational procedure’, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg 96, 373–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupont, T., Glowinski, R., Kinton, W. and Wheeler, M.F. (1992), ‘Mixed finite element methods for time-dependent problems: application to control’, in Finite Element in Fluids, vol. 8 (Chung, T., ed.) Hemisphere (Washington, DC) 137–163.Google Scholar

Ekeland, I. and Temam, R. (1974), Analyse Convexe et Problèmes Variationnels, Dunod (Paris).Google Scholar

Engquist, B., Gustafsson, B. and Vreeburg, J. (1978), ‘Numerical solution of a PDE system describing a catalytic converter’, J. Comput. Phys. 27, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabre, C., Puel, J.P. and Zuazua, E. (1993), ‘Contrôlabilité approchée de l'équation de la chaleur linéaire avec des contrôles de norme L ^∞ minimale’, C.R. Acad. Sci. I 316, 679–684.Google Scholar

Friedman, A. (1988), ‘Modeling catalytic converter performance’, in Mathematics in Industrial Problems, Part 4 (Friedman, A., ed.) Springer (New York) Ch. 7, 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friend, CM. (1993), ‘Catalysis and surfaces’, Scientific American (04) 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujita, H. and Suzuki, T. (1991), ‘Evolution problems’, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis vol. II (Ciarlet, P.G. and Lions, J.L., eds.) North-Holland (Amsterdam) 789–928.Google Scholar

Fursikov, V. (1992) ‘Lagrange principle for problems of optimal control of ill posed or singular distributed systems’, J. Math. Pures et Appl. 71(2), 139–194.Google Scholar

Gabay, D. (1982), ‘Application de la méthode des multiplicateurs aux inéquations variationnelles’, in Méthodes de Lagrangien Augmenté (Fortin, M. and Glowinski, R., eds.) Dunod-Bordas, (Paris).Google Scholar

Gabay, D. (1983) ‘Application of the method of multipliers to variational inequalities’, in Augmented Lagrangian Methods (Fortin, M. and Glowinski, R., eds.) North-Holland (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

George, J.A. (1971), ‘Computer implementation of the finite element method’, PhD Thesis, Computer Sciences Department, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Glowinski, R. (1984), Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Variational Problems, Springer (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glowinski, R. (1991), ‘Finite element methods for the numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow. Introduction to the control of the Navier-Stokes equations’, in Lectures in Applied Mathematics, vol. 28, American Mathematical Society (Providence, RI) 219–301.Google Scholar

Glowinski, R. (1992a), ‘Ensuring well-posedness by analogy: Stokes problem and boundary control for the wave equation’, J. Comput. Phys. 103, 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glowinski, R. (1992b), ‘Boundary controllability problems for the wave and heat equations’, in Boundary Control and Boundary Variation (Zolesio, J.P., ed.) Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 178, Springer (Berlin) 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glowinski, R. and Le Tallec, P. (1989), Augmented Lagrangian and Operator-Splitting Methods in Nonlinear Mechanics, SIAM (Philadelphia, PA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glowinski, R. and Li, C.H. (1990), ‘On the numerical implementation of the Hilbert uniqueness method for the exact boundary controllability of the wave equation’, C.R. Acad. Sci. I 311, 135–142.Google Scholar

Glowinski, R. and Li, C.H. (1991), ‘On the exact Neumann boundary controllability of the wave equation’, in Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation Phenomena (Cohen, G., Halpern, L. and Joly, P., eds.) SIAM (Philadelphia, PA) 15–24.Google Scholar

Glowinski, R., Kinton, W. and Wheeler, M.F. (1989), ‘A mixed finite element formulation for the boundary controllability of the wave equation’, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engrg 27, 623–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glowinski, R., Li, C.H. and Lions, J.L. (1990), ‘A numerical approach to the exact boundary controllability of the wave equation (I) Dirichlet controls: description of the numerical methods’, Japan. J. Appl. Math. 7, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glowinski, R., Lions, J.L. and Tremolières, R. (1976), Analyse Numérique des Inéquations Variationnelles, Dunod (Paris).Google Scholar

Glowinski, R., Lions, J.L. and Tremolières, R. (1981), Numerical Analysis of Variational Inequalities, North-Holland (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Golub, G.H. and Van Loan, C. (1989), Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins Press (Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar

Hackbush, W. (1985), Multigrids Methods and Applications, Springer (Berlin).Google Scholar

Haraux, A. and Jaffard, S. (1991), ‘Pointwise and spectral control of plate vibrations’, Revista Matematica Iberoamericana 7, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, J. (1978), ‘Contrôle d'un Réacteur Enzymatique à l'Aide de Modèles à Paramètres Distribués. Quelques Problèmes de Contrôlabilité de Systèmes Paraboliques’, Thèse d'État, Université P. et M. Curie.Google Scholar

Hörmander, L. (1976), Linear Partial Differential Operators, Springer (Berlin).Google Scholar

Joó, I. (1991), ‘Contrôlabilité Exacte et propriétés d'oscillations de l'équation des ondes par analyse non harmonique’, C.R. Acad. Sci. I 312, 119–122.Google Scholar

Komornik, V. (1994), Exact Controllability and Stabilization. The Multiplier Method, Masson (Paris).Google Scholar

Ladyzenskaya, O.A., Solonnikov, V.A. and Ural'ceva, N.N. (1968), Linear and Quasi-linear Equations of Parabolic Type, American Mathematical Society (Providence, RI).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagnese, J.E. (1989), ‘Exact boundary controllability of Maxwell's equations in a general region’, SIAM J. Control Optimiz. 27, 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagnese, J.E., Leugering, G. and Schmidt, G. (1992), ‘Modelling and controllability of networks of thin beams’, in System Modelling and Optimization, Lecture Notes in Control and Information, vol. 97, Springer (Berlin), 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagnese, J.E., Leugering, G. and Schmidt, G. (1994), Modeling, Analysis and Control of Dynamic Elastic Multi-Link Structures, Binkhäuser (Boston, Basel, Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasiecka, I. (1992), Exponential decay rates for the solutions of Euler Bernoulli equations with boundary dissipation occurring in the moments only. J. Diff. Equations 95, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasiecka, I. and Tataru, R. (1994), Uniform boundary stabilization of semilinear wave equations with non linear boundary conditions, Diff. and Integral Equations.Google Scholar

Laursen, T.A. and Simo, J.C. (1993), ‘A continuum-based finite element formulation for the implicit solution of multi-body, large deformation frictional contact problems’, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engrg 36, 3451–3486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lax, P.D. and Phillips, R.S. (1989), Scattering Theory, Academic (New York).Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1961), Equations Différentielles Opérationnelles et Problèmes aux Limites, Springer (Heidelberg).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1968), Contrôle Optimal des Systèmes Gouvernés par des Equations aux Dérivées Partielles, Dunod (Paris).Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1969), Quelques Méthodes de Résolution des Problèmes aux Limites Non Linéaires, Dunod (Paris).Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1983), Contrôle des Systèmes Distribués Singuliers, Gauthier-Villars (Paris) (English translation: Gauthier-Villars (Paris) 1985).Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1986), ‘Contrôlabilité exacte des systèmes distribués’, C.R. Acad. Sci. I 302, 471–475.Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1988a), ‘Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbation for distributed systems’, SIAM Rev. 30, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1988b), Contrôlabilité Exacte, Perturbation et Stabilisation des Systèmes Distribués, vols. 1 and 2, Masson (Paris). (English Translation, Springer 1994).Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1990), El Planeta Tierra, Instituto de España, Espasa Calpe, S.A., Madrid.Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1990b), ‘On some hyperbolic equations with a pressure term’, Proc. CIRM Conf. Trento, Italy, October.Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1991a), ‘Exact controllability for distributed systems: some trends and some problems’, in Applied and Industrial Mathematics (Spigler, R., ed.) Kluwer (Dordrecht) 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1991b), ‘Approximate controllability for parabolic systems’, Harvey Lectures, Haiffa.Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. (1993), ‘Quelques remarques sur la contrôlabilité en liaison avec des questions d'environnement’, in Les Grands Systèmes des Sciences et de la Technologie (Horowitz, J. and Lions, J.L., eds.), Masson (Paris) 240–264.Google Scholar

Lions, J.L. and Magenes, E. (1968), Problèmes aux Limites Non Homogènes, vol. 1, Dunod (Paris). (English Translation, Springer, 1972).Google Scholar

Lions, P.L. and Mercier, B. (1979), ‘Splitting algorithms for the sum of two nonlinear operators’, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 16, 964–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marini, G., Testa, P. and Valente, V. (1994), ‘Exact controllability of a spherical cap: numerical implementation of HUM’, J. Opt. Theory and Appl. To appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, K., Poinsot, Th. and Candel, S. (1993), ‘Review of active control of combustion instabilities’, Prog. Energy and Combustion Sci. 19, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Y. (1989), Private communication.Google Scholar

Mizohata, S. (1958), ‘Unicité du prolongement des solutions pour quelques opérateurs différentiels paraboliques’, Mem. Coll. Sci. Univ. Kyoto A 31, 219–239.Google Scholar

Narukawa, J. (1983), ‘Boundary value control of thermo-elastic systems’, Hiroshima J. Math. 13, 227–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nečas, J. (1967), Les Méthodes Directes en Théorie des Équations Elliptiques, Masson (Paris).Google Scholar

Nocedal, J. (1992), ‘Theory of algorithms for unconstrained optimization’, Acta Numerica 1992, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge) 199–242.Google Scholar

Park, K.C., Chiou, J.C. and Downer, J.D. (1990), ‘Explicit-implicit staggered procedures for multibody dynamics analysis’, J. Guidance Control Dyn. 13, 562–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peaceman, D. and Rachford, H. (1955), ‘The numerical solution of parabolic and elliptic differential equations’, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 3, 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polack, E. (1971), Computational Methods in Optimization, Academic (New York).Google Scholar

Powell, M.J.D. (1976), ‘Some convergence properties of the conjugate gradient method’, Math. Program. 11, 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raviart, P.A. and Thomas, J.M. (1988), Introduction à l'Analyse Numérique des Équations aux Dérivées Partielles, Masson (Paris).Google Scholar

Roberts, J.E. and Thomas, J.M. (1991), ‘Mixed and hybrid methods’, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. II (Ciarlet, P.G. and Lions, J.L., eds.) North-Holland (Amsterdam) 523–639.Google Scholar

Rockafellar, A.T. (1970), Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russel, D.L. (1978), ‘Controllability and stabilizability theory for linear partial differential equations. Recent progress and open questions’, SIAM Rev. 20, 639–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samaniego, J.M., Yip, B., Poinsot, Th. and Candel, S. (1993), ‘Low frequency combustion instability mechanisms inside dump combustor’, Combustion and Flame 94, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanchez Hubert, J. and Sanchez Palencia, E. (1989), Vibrations and Coupling of Continuous Systems (Asymptotic Methods), Springer (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saut, J.C. and Scheurer, B. (1987) ‘Unique continuation for some evolution equations’, J. Diff. Eqns 66, 118–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellin, R.H. and Moses, T. (1989), Drag Reduction in Fluid Flows, Ellis Horwood (Chichester).Google Scholar

Sritharan, S.S. (1991a), ‘Dynamic programming of Navier-Stokes equations’, Syst. Control Lett. 16, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sritharan, S.S. (1991b), ‘An optimal control problem for exterior hydrodynamics’, in Distributed Parameter Control Systems: New Trends and Applications (Chen, G., Lee, E.B., Littman, W. and Markus, L., eds.) Marcel Dekker (New York) 385–417.Google Scholar

Taflove, A. (1992), ‘Re-inventing electromagnetics, supercomputing solution of Maxwell's equations via direct time integration on space grids’, 30th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, AIAA Paper 92–0333.Google Scholar

Tataru, D. (1994a), Boundary controllability for conservative P.D.E. To appear.Google Scholar

Tataru, D. (1994b), Decay rates and attractors for semilinear P.D.E. To appear.Google Scholar

Thomée, V. (1990), ‘Finite difference methods for linear parabolic equations’, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. I (Ciarlet, P.G. and Lions, J.L., eds.) North-Holland (Amsterdam) 5–196.Google Scholar

Yserentant, H. (1993) ‘Old and new convergence proofs for multigrid methods’, Acta Numerica 1993, Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge) 285–326.Google Scholar

Zuazua, E. (1988), ‘Contrôlabilité exacte en un temps arbitrairement petit de quelques modèles de plaques’, Appendix 1 of Contrôlabilité Exacte, Pertubations et Stabilisation de Systèmes Distribués, vol. I, by Lions, J.L., Masson (Paris), 465–491.Google Scholar

Zuazua, E. (1993), ‘Contrôlabilité du système de la thermo-élasticité’, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris I 317, 371–376.Google Scholar