Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:24:54.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of the semi-structured Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) interview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2017

Rugül Köse Çinar  and
Søren Dinesen Østergaard
Rugül Köse Çinar*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Trakya University Hospital, Edirne, Turkey
Søren Dinesen Østergaard
Affiliation:
Psychosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Risskov, Denmark
*
*Rugül Köse Çinar, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Trakya University Hospital, Edirne, Turkey. Tel: 905337330407; Fax: 902842353451; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Recently, a semi-structured interview dedicated to aid rating on the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) was developed. Here, we aimed to validate PDAS ratings collected via this semi-structured interview.

Methods

A total of 50 patients with psychotic depression – 34 with unipolar psychotic depression and 16 with bipolar psychotic depression – were recruited for the study. The following aspects of validity were investigated: clinical validity, psychometric validity (scalability), and responsiveness.

Results

The PDAS ratings were clinically valid (Spearman’s coefficient of correlation between PDAS total scores and Clinical Global Impressions scale – severity of illness ratings=0.66, p<0.001), scalable (Loevinger’s coefficient of heterogeneity at endpoint=0.45), and responsive (no participants met the criterion for remission on the PDAS (total score <8) at baseline – at endpoint 74% (95% CI: 60–85) of the participants met this criterion).

Conclusions

The semi-structured PDAS interview provides valid ratings of the severity of psychotic depression.

Keywords

psychiatric status rating scalespsychometricsaffective disorders, psychoticmood disorders
Type
Short Communication
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 175 - 180
Copyright
© Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rothschild, AJ. Clinical manual for diagnosis and treatment of psychotic depression. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc., 2009.Google Scholar
2. Ostergaard, SD, Leadholm, AK, Rothschild, AJ. Persistent delusional theme over 13 episodes of psychotic depression. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2013;25:370–373.Google Scholar
3. Gesi, C, Carmassi, C, Miniati, M, Benvenuti, A, Massimetti, G, Dell’Osso, L. Psychotic spectrum symptoms across the lifespan are related to lifetime suicidality among 147 patients with bipolar I or major depressive disorder. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2016;15:15.Google Scholar
4. Zalpuri, I, Rothschild, AJ. Does psychosis increase the risk of suicide in patients with major depression? A systematic review. J Affect Disord 2016;198:23–31.Google Scholar
5. Leadholm, AK, Rothschild, AJ, Nielsen, J, Bech, P, Ostergaard, SD. Risk factors for suicide among 34,671 patients with psychotic and non-psychotic severe depression. J Affect Disord 2014;156:119–125.Google Scholar
6. Ostergaard, SD, Rothschild, AJ, Flint, AJ et al. Rating scales measuring the severity of psychotic depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015;132:335–344.Google Scholar
7. Ostergaard, SD, Meyers, BS, Flint, AJ et al. Measuring psychotic depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014;129:211–220.Google Scholar
8. Meyers, BS, Flint, AJ, Rothschild, AJ et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of olanzapine plus sertraline vs olanzapine plus placebo for psychotic depression: the study of pharmacotherapy of psychotic depression (STOP-PD). Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:838–847.Google Scholar
9. Ostergaard, SD, Meyers, BS, Flint, AJ et al. Measuring treatment response in psychotic depression: the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) takes both depressive and psychotic symptoms into account. J Affect Disord 2014;160:68–73.Google Scholar
10. Bech, P, Gram, LF, Dein, E, Jacobsen, O, Vitger, J, Bolwig, TG. Quantitative rating of depressive states. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1975;51:161–170.Google Scholar
11. Hamilton, M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967;6:278–296.Google Scholar
12. Overall, JE, Gorham, DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep 1962;10:799–812.Google Scholar
13. Ostergaard, SD, Pedersen, CH, Uggerby, P et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of the psychotic depression assessment scale. J Affect Disord 2015;173:261–268.Google Scholar
14. First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders, clinician version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1996.Google Scholar
15. Guy, W. editor Clinical global impressions scale. In: ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD, USA: US Department of Health, Education and Wel-fare publication no. (AMD) 76-338, NIMH, 1976.Google Scholar
16. Mokken, R. Theory and practice of scale analysis. Berlin, Germany: Mouton, 1971.Google Scholar
17. Loevinger, J. Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Biol Psychiatry 1957;3:249–252.Google Scholar
18. Ostergaard, SD, Rothschild, AJ, Flint, AJ et al. Establishing the cut-off score for remission and severity-ranges on the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS). J Affect Disord 2016;190:111–114.Google Scholar
19. Molenaar, IW, Debels, P, Sijtsma, K. User’s Manual MSP: a program for Mokken Scale Analyses for Polytomous Items (Version 3.0). Groeningen, the Netherlands: ProGAMMA, 1994.Google Scholar
20. Ostergaard, SD, Bertelsen, A, Nielsen, J, Mors, O, Petrides, G. The association between psychotic mania, psychotic depression and mixed affective episodes among 14,529 patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2013;147:44–50.Google Scholar
21. Ostergaard, SD, Petrides, G, Dinesen, PT et al. The association between physical morbidity and subtypes of severe depression. Psychother Psychosom 2013;82:45–52.Google Scholar
22. Loo, CK, Mahon, M, Katalinic, N, Lyndon, B, Hadzi-Pavlodic, D. Predictors of response to ultrabrief right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy. J Affect Disord 2011;130:192–197.Google Scholar
23. Petrides, G, Fink, M, Husain, MM et al. ECT remission rates in psychotic versus nonpsychotic depressed patients: a report from CORE. J ECT 2001;17:244–253.Google Scholar
24. Leadholm, AK, Rothschild, AJ, Nolen, WA, Bech, P, Munk-Jorgensen, P, Ostergaard, SD. The treatment of psychotic depression: is there consensus among guidelines and psychiatrists? J Affect Disord 2013;145:214–220.Google Scholar