Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T22:14:59.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To E or not to E? The case for electronic health records

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Michael Berk ,
Paul Cohen ,
Thomas Callaly  and
Sue Lauder
Michael Berk*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Barwon Health, University of Melbourne, Geelong, Victoria, Australia ORYGEN Youth Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Mental Health Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Paul Cohen
Affiliation:
Central Services, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Thomas Callaly
Affiliation:
Community and Mental Health, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Sue Lauder
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Barwon Health, University of Melbourne, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
*
Professor Michael Berk, Department Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Swanston Centre – Barwon Health, University of Melbourne, PO Box 281, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia. Tel: +61 3 5226 7450; Fax: +61 3 5246 5165; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Intervention Insights
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 104 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gunter, TD, Terry, NP. The emergence of national electronic health record architectures in the United States and Australia: models, costs, and questions. J Med Internet Res 2005;7:e3. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, J, Bond, G. A comparison of electronic records to paper records in mental health centers. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;Dec. 1-8. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm064 (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linder, JA, Ma, J, Bates, DW, Middleton, B, Stafford, RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1400–1405. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, S, DuMouchel, W, Bahamonde, L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996;3:399–409. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Häyrinen, K, Saranto, K, Nykänen, P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform 2007 (in press).Google ScholarPubMed
Bonacina, S, Marceglia, S, Bertoldi, M, Pinciroli, F. A web-based system for family health record. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;1:3652–3656. Google Scholar
Pagliari, C, Detmer, D, Singleton, P. Potential of electronic personal health records. BMJ 2007;335:330–333. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chhanabhai, P, Holt, A. Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures. GenMed 2007;9:8. Google ScholarPubMed
Valdes, I, Kibbe, DC, Tolleson, G, Kunik, ME, Petersen, LA. Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records. Inform Prim Care 2004;12:3–9. Google ScholarPubMed
Middleton, B, Hammond, WE, Brennan, PF, Cooper, GF. Accelerating U.S. EHR adoption: how to get there from here. Recommendations based on the 2004 ACMI retreat. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:13–19. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linder, JA, Schnipper, JL, Tsurikova, R, Melnikas, AJ, Volk, LA, Middleton, B. Barriers to electronic health record use during patient visits. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006;499–503. Google ScholarPubMed
Baron, RJ. Quality improvement with an electronic health record: achievable, but not automatic. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:549–552. CrossRefGoogle Scholar