Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:11:39.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A randomised, placebo-controlled 24-week study evaluating adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with major depressive disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

Michael Bauer*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Nanco Hefting
Affiliation:
H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark
Annika Lindsten
Affiliation:
H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark
Mette Krog Josiassen
Affiliation:
H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark
Mary Hobart
Affiliation:
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Michael Bauer, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate brexpiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant therapies (ADTs) as maintenance treatment in patients with major depressive disorder with inadequate response to ADT, utilising a novel study design.

Methods

The study comprised an 8-week prospective treatment period with open-label ADT with double-blind placebo treatment and a 24-week randomised treatment period. Investigators and patients were blinded to treatment periods, randomisation criteria, and timing of randomisation. Patients with early response to open-label ADT were withdrawn at Week 6. Patients fulfilling criteria for inadequate response were randomised to ADT+brexpiprazole 1–3 mg/day, or ADT+placebo. The primary endpoint was full remission: Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤10 and ≥50% decrease from randomisation (i.e. baseline) in MADRS total score for at least 8 consecutive weeks.

Results

The primary efficacy analysis failed to show a statistically significant difference between the proportions of patients on ADT+brexpiprazole (21.4%) and ADT+placebo (24.9%) achieving full remission; odds ratio: 0.83; p=0.2641. The secondary endpoint of change from baseline to Week 6 in MADRS total score showed no difference between ADT+brexpiprazole and ADT+placebo (−0.4; p=0.3259). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) in patients receiving ADT+brexpiprazole was weight increased (9.5% vs. 5.0% in ADT+placebo). The incidence of TEAEs leading to withdrawal in the randomised treatment period was 6.3% in the ADT+brexpiprazole group and 3.4% in the ADT+placebo group.

Conclusion

Adjunctive brexpiprazole did not differentiate from ADT+placebo on the primary endpoint of full remission. A number of design elements in this previously untried study design may have contributed to the study result. Brexpiprazole was well tolerated.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kessler, RC, Berglund, P, Demler, O, Jin, R, Koretz, D Merikangas, KR , Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS; National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2003) The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 289, 30953105.Google Scholar
2. Han, C, Wang, SM, Kato, M, Lee, SJ, Patkar, AA, Masand, PS Pae, CU (2013) Second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of major depressive disorder: current evidence. Expert Rev Neurother 13, 851870.Google Scholar
3. Papakostas, GI (2009) Managing partial response or nonresponse: switching, augmentation, and combination strategies for major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 70(Suppl. 6), 1625.Google Scholar
4. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, Niederehe G, Thase ME, Lavori PW, Lebowitz BD, McGrath PJ, Rosenbaum JF, Sackeim HA, Kupfer DJ, Luther J and Fava M (2006) Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 163, 19051917.Google Scholar
5. Connolly, KR Thase, ME (2011) If at first you don’t succeed: a review of the evidence for antidepressant augmentation, combination and switching strategies. Drugs 71, 4364.Google Scholar
6. Nelson, JC Papakostas, GI (2009) Atypical antipsychotic augmentation in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Am J Psychiatry 166, 980991.Google Scholar
7. Maeda K, Sugino H, Akazawa H, Amada N, Shimada J, Futamura T, Yamashita H, Ito N, McQuade RD, Mørk A, Pehrson AL, Hentzer M, Nielsen V, Bundgaard C, Arnt J, Stensbøl TB and Kikuchi T (2014) Brexpiprazole I: in vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel serotonin-dopamine activity modulator. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 350, 589604.Google Scholar
8. Thase ME, Youakim JM, Skuban A, Hobart M, Augustine C, Zhang P, McQuade RD, Carson WH, Nyilas M, Sanchez R and Eriksson H (2015) Efficacy and safety of adjunctive brexpiprazole 2 mg in major depressive disorder: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry 76, 12241231.Google Scholar
9. Thase ME, Youakim JM, Skuban A, Hobart M, Zhang P, McQuade RD, Nyilas M, Carson WH, Sanchez R and Eriksson H (2015) Adjunctive brexpiprazole 1 and 3 mg for patients with major depressive disorder following inadequate response to antidepressants: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry 76, 12321240.Google Scholar
10. Hobart, M, Skuban, A, Zhang, P, Augustine, C, Brewer, C, Hefting, N, Sanchez, R McQuade, RD (2018) A randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose brexpiprazole 2 mg/day as adjunctive treatment of adults with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 79, 17m12058.Google Scholar
11. Hobart M, Skuban A, Zhang P, Josiassen MK, Hefting N, Augustine C, Brewer C, Sanchez R and McQuade RD (2018) Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed brexpiprazole for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, active-referenced, placebo-controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin 34, 633642.Google Scholar
12. Rapaport MH, Gharabawi GM, Canuso CM, Mahmoud RA, Keller MB, Bossie CA, Turkoz I, Lasser RA, Loescher A, Bouhours P, Dunbar F and Nemeroff CB (2006) Effects of risperidone augmentation in patients with treatment-resistant depression: Results of open-label treatment followed by double-blind continuation. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 25052513.Google Scholar
13. Brunner, E, Tohen, M, Osuntokun, O, Landry, J Thase, ME (2014) Efficacy and safety of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination vs fluoxetine monotherapy following successful combination therapy of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 25492559.Google Scholar
14. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), 4th edn. Arlington, VA: APA, 2000.Google Scholar
15. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R and Dunbar GC (1998) The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 59(Suppl. 20), 2233.Google Scholar
16. Montgomery, SA Åsberg, M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 134, 382389.Google Scholar
17. Guy, W (1976) Clinical global impressions. In: Guy W, editor. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, p. 217222.Google Scholar
18. Fava, M (2003) Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 53, 649659.Google Scholar
19. Sheehan, DV, Harnett-Sheehan, K Raj, BA (1996) The measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 11, 8995.Google Scholar
20. Simpson, GM Angus, JW (1970) A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 212, 1119.Google Scholar
21. Barnes, TR (1989) A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia. Br J Psychiatry 154, 672676.Google Scholar
22. Guy, W (1976) Abnormal involuntary movement scale. In: Guy W, editor. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. p. 534–536.Google Scholar
23. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S and Mann JJ (2011) The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry 168, 12661277.Google Scholar
24. Schatzberg, AF (2015) Development of new psychopharmacological agents for depression and anxiety. Psychiatr Clin North Am 38, 379393.Google Scholar
25. Ball, SG, Atkinson, S, Sparks, J, Bangs, M, Goldberger, C Dube, S (2015) Long-term, open-label, safety study of edivoxetine 12 to 18 mg once daily as adjunctive treatment for patients with major depressive disorder who are partial responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. J Clin Psychopharmacol 35, 266272.Google Scholar
26. Pae CU, Jeon HJ, Lee BC, Seo HJ, Kim SG, Park EJ, Kim W, Kwak KP, Han C, Cho SJ, Hahn SW, Jon DI, Choi JH and Jun TY (2013) Aripiprazole augmentation for treatment of patients with chronic or recurrent major depressive disorder: a 12-week prospective open-label multicentre study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 28, 322329.Google Scholar
27. Nelson, CZP, Skuban, A, Hobart, M, Weiss, C, Weiller, E Thase, M (2016) Overview of short-term and long-term safety of brexpiprazole in patients with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rev 12, 278290.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bauer et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Bauer et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19 KB