Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:50:41.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychometric analysis of the Melancholia Scale in trials with non-pharmacological augmentation of patients with therapy-resistant depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2013

Per Bech*
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
Lise Lauritzen
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
Marianne Lunde
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
Mogens Unden
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
Lone Christina Hellström
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre Bispebjerg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Claudio Csillag
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
Klaus Martiny
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Department O, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Per Bech, Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Dyrehavevej 48, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark. Tel: +45 38 64 30 95; Fax: +45 48 26 38 77; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

The Melancholia Scale (MES) consists of the psychic core items of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D6) (depressed mood, interests, psychic anxiety, general somatic, guilt feelings, and psychomotor retardation) and the neuropsychiatric items of the Cronholm–Ottossen Depression Scale. Patients resistant to anti-depressant medication (therapy-resistant depression) have participated in our trials with non-pharmacological augmentation. On the basis of these trials, we have evaluated to what extent the neuropsychiatric subscale of the MES (concentration difficulties, fatigability, emotional introversion, sleep problems, and decreased verbal communication) is a measure of severity of apathia when compared with the HAM-D6 subscale of the MES.

Methods

We have focused on rating sessions at baseline (week 0) and after 2 and 4 weeks of therapy in four clinical trials on therapy-resistant depression with the following augmentations: electroconvulsive therapy, bright light therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation or pulsed electromagnetic fields, and wake therapy. The item response theory model constructed by Mokken has been used as the psychometric validation of unidimensionality. For the numerical evaluation of transferability, we have tested item ranks across the rating weeks.

Results

In the Mokken analysis, the coefficient of homogeneity was above 0.40 for both the HAM-D subscale and the apathia subscale at week 4. The numerical transferability across the weeks was statistically significant (p < 0.05) for both subscales.

Conclusion

The apathia subscale is a unidimensional scale with acceptable transferability for the measurement of treatment-resistant symptoms, analogue to the psychic core subscale (HAM-D6).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), 5th edn.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.Google Scholar
2.Bech, P. Clinical Psychometrics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Mokken, RJ. Theory and Practice of Scale Analysis. Berlin: Mouton, 1971.Google Scholar
4.Licht, RW, Bech, P. ‘The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the gold standard become a lead weight?’: comment. Am J Psychiatry Dec 2005;162:23942395.Google Scholar
5.Licht, RW, Qvitzau, S, Allerup, P, Bech, P. Validation of the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale in patients with major depression; is the total score a valid measure of illness severity? Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005;111:144149.Google Scholar
6.Andreasson, K, Liest, V, Lunde, Met al. Identifying patients with therapy-resistant depression by using factor analysis. Pharmacopsychiatry 2010;43:252256.Google Scholar
7.Bech, P. The Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale (MES) in clinical trials of therapies in depressive disorders: a 20-year review of its use as outcome measure. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;106:252264.Google Scholar
8.Healy, D. The Suspended Revolution: Psychiatry and Psychology Re-Examined. New York: Faber & Faber, 1989.Google Scholar
9.Ottosson, JO. Experimental studies of the mode of action of electroconvulsive therapy: introduction. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1960;35:56.Google Scholar
10.Bech, P. The Cronholm-Ottosson Depression Scale: the first depression scale designed to rate changes during treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;84:439445.Google Scholar
11.Lauritzen, L, Odgaard, K, Clemmesen, Let al. Relapse prevention by means of paroxetine in ECT-treated patients with major depression: a comparison with imipramine and placebo in medium-term continuation therapy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;94:241251.Google Scholar
12.Martiny, K, Lunde, M, Unden, M, Dam, H, Bech, P. Adjunctive bright light in non-seasonal major depression: results from patient-reported symptom and well-being scales. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005;111:453459.Google Scholar
13.Bretlau, LG, Lunde, M, Lindberg, L, Unden, M, Dissing, S, Bech, P. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with escitalopram in patients with treatment-resistant major depression: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Pharmacopsychiatry 2008;41:4147.Google Scholar
14.Martiny, K, Lunde, M, Bech, P. Transcranial low voltage pulsed electromagnetic fields in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2010;68:163169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Martiny, K, Refsgaard, E, Lund, Vet al. A 9-week randomized trial comparing a chronotherapeutic intervention (wake and light therapy) to exercise in major depressive disorder patients treated with duloxetine. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73:12341242.Google Scholar
16.Molenaar, IW, Debels, P, Sijtsna, K. User's Manual MSP, a Program for Mokken Scale Analyses for Polytomous Items (Version 3.0). Groeningen, the Netherlands: ProGAMMA, 1994.Google Scholar
17.Bech, P. Rating scales for affective disorders: their validity and consistency. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1981;295:1101.Google Scholar
18.Siegel, S. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
19.Foulds, GA. The Hierarchical Nature of Personal Illness. London: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
20.Maj, M. Development and validation of the current concept of major depression. Psychopathology 2012;45:135146.Google Scholar
21.Angst, J. Treated versus untreated major depressive episodes. Psychopathology 1998;31:3744.Google Scholar
22.Healy, D, Williams, JM. Dysrhythmia, dysphoria, and depression: the interaction of learned helplessness and circadian dysrhythmia in the pathogenesis of depression. Psychol Bull 1988;103:163178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Hamilton, M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967;6:278296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Hellström, LC, Bech, P, Nordentoft, M, Hansen, JL, Eplov, LF. Sherpa. The effect of an early supported employment intervention for patients with anxiety or an affective disorder – a randomised clinical trial. Trials 2013, in press.Google Scholar