Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:58:17.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interrater reliability of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

E. Hoencamp ,
I. Betten  and
P.M.J. Haffmans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Interrater reliability of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

Interrater reliability of the Dutch version of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD 17 items) was investigated. Although sufficient, a kappa of .65, found for all raters, was not very high. Specifically item 2 (feelings of guilt) and item 11 (psychic anxiety) seemed difficult to judge. The most experienced raters achieved the highest kappas as well on the total score of the HRSD.

It is concluded that this version of the HRSD, if administered by experienced raters, is a reasonably reliable instrument to obtain a certain ‘cut-off score (for instance in-exclusion criterium) as well as to measure the change in severity of the depression during treatment.

Keywords

HRSDinterrater reliabilitykappaHRSDtussenbeoordelaarsbetrouwbaarheidkappa
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 86 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatuur

1.Hamilton, M.A rating scale for depression. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1960;23:56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Hamilton, M.Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br soc clin Psychol 1967;6:278–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Zitman, FG, Griez, EJL.. Meetschalen voor angst en depressie. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 1990;134:845–8.Google Scholar
4.Hooijer, Ch, Zitman, FG, Griez, E, Tilburg, van W, Willemse, A, Dinkgreve, MAHM.The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS): changes in score as a function of training and version used. J Aff Dis 1991;22:21–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Bech, P, Gram, LF, Deine, E, Jacobsen, O, Vitger, J, Bolwig, TG.Quantative rating of depressive states. Acta psychiat scand 1975;51:161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Maier, W, Buller, R, Phillip, M, Heuser, I.The Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Reliability, validity and sensitivity to chance in anxiety and depressive disorders. J aff Dis 1988;14:61–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Korner, A, Nielsen, BM, Eschen, F, et al.Qualifying depressive symptomatology: interrater reliability and interitem correlations. J aff Dis 1990;20:143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bech, P, Rastrup, M, Rafaelsen, OJ.Mini compendium of rating scales for states of anxiety, depression, mania, schizophrenia with corresponding DSM-III syndromes. Dutch translation D'Haenen, HAH, Verhoeven, WMA.Brüssel: VUB Press, 1989:47–61.Google Scholar
9.Popping, R.Traces of agreement. On the dot-product as a coefficent of agreement. Qual Quant 1983;17:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar