Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:31:15.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral neurology versus biological psychiatry: intellectual origins of their position within neuropsychiatry. Part II. Origins and influence of psychodynamic psychiatry; intellectual ties with biological psychiatry; behavioral neurology as revival of academic neuropsychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

W. van den Bergh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this second part the origins of Freudian psychoanalysis in neuropsychiatry is discussed, but also its ties with the pre-scientific ‘Naturphilosophie’. The alienistic psychiatry was deeply influenced by psychodynamic theories.

Biological psychiatry has more intellectual ties with psychodynamic psychiatry than with the old academic neuropsychiatry. Behavioral neurology is to be considered as a revival of the old academic neuropsychiatry.

Keywords

psychoanalysisbiological psychiatrybehavioral neurologyintellectual originspsychoanalysebiologische psychiatriegedragsneurologieintellectuele ontstaansgeschiedenis
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 21 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatuur

1.Geschwind, N. The paradoxical position of Kurt Goldstein in the history of aphasia. Cortex 1964; 1: 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Valenstein, ES. Great and desperate Cures: the Rise and Decline of Psychosurgery and other radical Treatments for mental Illness. New York: Basic Books Inc, 1986.Google Scholar
3.Lishman, WA. What is neuropsychiatry ? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1992; 55: 983–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Praag, HM van. Psychotropic drugs and biological psychiatry. In: Prick, JJG, red. Human Human Moods, Feelings and Emotions. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1968: 116–21.Google Scholar
5.Praag, HM van. De biologische psychiatrie op weg naar de toe-komst en de gevaren van vooruitgang. Acta neuropsychiat 1991;3: 36–41.Google Scholar
6.Korf, J. Psychofarmakologika VII: Alles is lekker en biologisch en psychisch. Acta neuropsychiat 1991; 3: 69–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Gabbard, GO. Psychodynamic psychiatry in the ‘decade of the brain’. Am J Psychiat 1992; 149: 991–8.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Bergh, W van den. Psychofarmakologika IX: Kanttekening. Acta neuropsychiat 1992; 4: 78–9.Google Scholar
9.Rümke, HC. Een bloeiende psychiatrie in gevaar. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema, 1954.Google Scholar
10.Hochmann, J, Jeannerod, M. Esprit, où es-tu ?Psychanalyse et Neurosciences. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1991.Google Scholar
11.Baxter, LR, Schwarz, JM, Guze, BH, Bergman, K, Szuba, MP. PET imaging in obsessive compulsive disorder with and without depression. J clin Psychiatry 1990; 51: 61–9.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Verhey, FHM. Acta Neuropsychiatrica: tijdschrift voor een heden-daagse neuropsychiatrie. Acta neuropsychiat 1989; 1: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed