Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:20:48.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidemiology and pathobiology of bipolar disorder, and their exploration within a complete catchment area population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

P.J. Scully ,
J.M. Owens ,
A. Kinsella  and
J.L. Waddington
P.J. Scully
Affiliation:
Stanley Foundation Research Unit, St. Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Ireland Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
J.M. Owens
Affiliation:
Stanley Foundation Research Unit, St. Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Ireland
A. Kinsella
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland
J.L. Waddington*
Affiliation:
Stanley Foundation Research Unit, St. Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Ireland Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
*
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland Fax 353-1-402 2453, E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Epidemiological and pathobiological findings in bipolar disorder [BP] have often been limited by selection bias and lack of epidemiological representativeness. In a rural, circumscribed catchment area, ‘all’ patients with BP were identified and assessed. On preliminary analysis, morbid risk [MR] for BP over the area as a whole was 5.0 ± 0.6/1000. The distribution of MR for BP over geographical subregions showed no significant deviation from a statistical model for random occurrences in space by place at birth, in contrast to schizophrenia [SZ], and varied only modestly among males by place at onset. These results imply different etiological factors acting in BP in comparison with SZ, particularly with regard to the role of early versus later life events. In preliminary analyses of psychotic and cognitive features, current severity of positive symptoms was predicted in BP only by increasing dominance of the left hand; negative symptoms by duration of illness and current anticholinergic exposure; poorer general and frontal cognitive function by older age at onset of illness, increasing duration of illness, and current anticholinergic exposure. The finding on handedness suggests disturbance of cerebral asymmetry associated with positive symptoms in BP, while both negative symptoms and cognitive impairment may involve progressive processes. Further analysis of this epidemiologically complete population, including systematic comparisons of BP with schizoaffective disorder and SZ, continues.

Keywords

bipolar disorderepidemiologypathobiologypsychosiscognition
Type
Articles
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 73 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Robins, LN, Helzer, JE. Weissman, MM,et al.Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:949–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Smith, AL, Weissman, MM. Epidemiology. In: Paykel, E (ed.). Handbook of Affective Disorders. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1992.Google Scholar
3.Kessler, RC. McGonagle, KA, Holmes, C, Abelson, JM, Zhao, S. The epidemiology of DSM-III-R bipolar I disorder in a general population survey. Psychol Med 1997;27:1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Weissman, MM, Bland, RC, Canino, GJ, et al.Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:293–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Torrey, EF. Epidemiological comparison of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophr Res 1999;39:101–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Goodwin, FK, Jamison, KR. Manic-Depressive Illness. New York, Oxford Press, 1991.Google Scholar
7.Freeman, H. Schizophrenia and city residence. Br J Psychiatry 1994;164 (Suppl. 23):39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Harvey, PD. Powchik, P, Parrella, M. White, L, Davidson, M. Symptom severity and cognitive impairment in chronically hospitalised geriatric patients with affective disorder. Br J Psychiatry 1997:170:369–374.Google Scholar
9.Hoff, AL, Shukla, S, Aronson, T, et al.Failure to differentiate bipolar disorder from schizophrenia on measures of neuropsychological function. Schizophr Res 1990;3:253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Cannon, M, Byrne, M, Cassidy, B, Larkin, C, Horgan, R, Sheppard, NP. O'Callaghan, E. Prevalence and correlates of mixed handedness in schizophrenia. Psychiatr Res 1995;59:119–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Crow, TJ. A continuum of psychosis, one human gene, and not much else – the case for homogeneity, Schizophr Res 1995;17:135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Reite, M. Teale, P, Rojas, DC, Arciniegas, D. Sheeder, J. Bipolar disorder: anomalous brain asvmmetrv associated with psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 1999:156:1159–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Youssef, HA,Scully, PJ, Kinsella, A,vWaddington, JL. Geographical variation in rate of schizophrenia in rural Ireland by place at birth versus place at onset. Schizophr Res 1999;37:233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Scully, PJ, Owens, JM, Kinsella, A, Waddington, JL. Small area variation in rate of schizophrenia vs bipolar disorder by place at birth vs place at onset within an Irish rural catchment area population. Schizophr Res 2000:41:64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Scully, PJ. Owens, JM, Kinsella, A, Waddington, JL. Asymmetry and progressive aspects of psychopathology and cognition in schizophrenia vs bipolar disorder within an epidemiologically complete population. Schizophr Res 2000:41:163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar