Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:14:33.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early intervention for conversion disorder: neurologists and psychiatrists working together

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2013

Selma Aybek ,
Monica Hubschmid ,
Corinna Mossinger ,
Alexandre Berney  and
François Vingerhoets
Selma Aybek*
Affiliation:
Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Monica Hubschmid
Affiliation:
Liaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Corinna Mossinger
Affiliation:
Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Alexandre Berney
Affiliation:
Liaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
François Vingerhoets
Affiliation:
Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
*
Selma Aybek, Service de Neurologie, BH13 Bugnon 44, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland. Tel: +41795568716; Fax: +41213141244; E‐mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of an early multidisciplinary (neurology and psychiatry) intervention for conversion disorder (CD).

Methods

Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with CD from 2005 to 2007 were compared to a control group of newly diagnosed CD patients receiving usual care. At 3 years, a questionnaire evaluated self‐rated subjective outcome, symptom severity, SF‐36 scores, employment status and medical care use.

Results

Data from 12 cases (mean age 25.5 ± 8.2; 9 females) and 11 controls (mean age 34.7 ± 13.5; 10 females) showed that 83% of cases had a good subjective outcome (symptom improved or cured) when only 36% of controls had a good outcome (p < 0.05). Cases significantly improved their SF‐36 scores on subscales involving physical complaints compared to controls. A minority (20%) of cases reduced or ceased professional activity when 70% of controls did (p < 0.001). Only 16% of cases sought further medical advice for the initial symptom when 73% of controls did. Both groups accepted psychiatric referrals (83% of cases and 73% of controls) and found it beneficial.

Conclusions

Early intervention involving both neurologists and psychiatrists is effective for CD in alleviating physical complaints, reducing sick leave and health care use.

Keywords

conversion disorderfunctional neurological symptomsoutcometreatment
Type
Original Articles
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 52 - 56
Copyright
Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Carson, AJ, Ringbauer, B, Stone, J, McKenzie, L, Warlow, C, Sharpe, M. Do medically unexplained symptoms matter? A prospective cohort study of 300 new referrals to neurology outpatient clinics. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:207–210.Google Scholar
2Carson, AJ, Best, S, Postma, K, Stone, J, Warlow, C, Sharpe, M. The outcome of neurology outpatients with medically unexplained symptoms: a prospective cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:897–900.Google Scholar
3Reid, S, Wessely, S, Crayford, T, Hotopf, M. Frequent attenders with medically unexplained symptoms: service use and costs in secondary care. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:248–253.Google Scholar
4Carson, A, Stone, J, Hibberd, C et al. Disability, distress and unemployment in neurology outpatients with symptoms ‘unexplained by organic disease’. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry 2011;82:810–813.Google Scholar
5Nicholson, TR, Stone, J, Kanaan, RA. Conversion disorder: a problematic diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011;82:1267–1273.Google Scholar
6Hallett, M. Psychogenic movement disorders: a crisis for neurology. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2006;6:269–271.Google Scholar
7Espay, AJ, Goldenhar, LM, Voon, V, Schrag, A, Burton, N, Lang, AE. Opinions and clinical practices related to diagnosing and managing patients with psychogenic movement disorders: an international survey of movement disorder society members. Mov Disord 2009;24:1366–1374.Google Scholar
8Carson, AJ, Stone, J, Warlow, C, Sharpe, M. Patients whom neurologists find difficult to help. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1776–1778.Google Scholar
9Moene, FC, Spinhoven, P, Hoogduin, KA, van Dyck, R. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a hypnosis‐based treatment for patients with conversion disorder, motor type. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003;51:29–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Shapiro, AP, Teasell, RW. Behavioural interventions in the rehabilitation of acute v. chronic non‐organic (conversion/factitious) motor disorders. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:140–146.Google Scholar
11Reuber, M, Burness, C, Howlett, S, Brazier, J, Grunewald, R. Tailored psychotherapy for patients with functional neurological symptoms: a pilot study. J Psychosom Res 2007;63:625–632.Google Scholar
12Goldstein, LH, Chalder, T, Chigwedere, C et al. Cognitive‐behavioral therapy for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a pilot RCT. Neurology. 2010;74:1986–1994.Google Scholar
13Ruddy, R, House, A. Psychosocial interventions for conversion disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD005331.Google Scholar
14Stone, J, Binzer, M, Sharpe, M. Illness beliefs and locus of control: a comparison of patients with pseudoseizures and epilepsy. J Psychosom Res 2004;57:541–547.Google Scholar
15Reid, S, Crayford, T, Patel, A, Wessely, S, Hotopf, M. Frequent attenders in secondary care: a 3‐year follow‐up study of patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Psychol Med 2003;33:519–524.Google Scholar
16Moene, FC, Spinhoven, P, Hoogduin, KA, van Dyck, R. A randomised controlled clinical trial on the additional effect of hypnosis in a comprehensive treatment programme for in‐patients with conversion disorder of the motor type. Psychother Psychosom 2002;71:66–76.Google Scholar
17Richard, J, Bouzourène, K, Gallant, S et al. Validation et normes du SF‐36 dans la populatio du canton du Vaud. In: IMSP, ed. Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive: Lausanne, 2002.Google Scholar
18Sharpe, M, Stone, J, Hibberd, C et al. Neurology out‐patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: illness beliefs and financial benefits predict 1‐year outcome. Psychol Med 2010;40:689–698.Google Scholar
19Couprie, W, Wijdicks, EF, Rooijmans, HG, van Gijn, J. Outcome in conversion disorder: a follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;58:750–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Crimlisk, HL, Bhatia, K, Cope, H, David, A, Marsden, CD, Ron, MA. Slater revisited: 6 year follow up study of patients with medically unexplained motor symptoms. BMJ 1998;316:582–586.Google Scholar