Element contents
Series: Elements in Ethics
Sidgwick's Ethics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2025
Summary
Henry Sidgwick's The Methods of Ethics is one of the most important and influential works in the history of moral philosophy. The Methods of Ethics clarifies and tackles some of the most enduring and difficult problems of morality. It offers readers a high-calibre example of analytical moral philosophy. This Element interprets and critically evaluates select positions and arguments in Sidgwick's The Methods of Ethics. It focuses specifically on Sidgwick's moral epistemology, his argument against common-sense morality, his argument for utilitarianism, his argument for rational egoism, and his argument for what he calls 'the dualism of practical reason', the thesis that utilitarianism and rational egoism are coordinate but conflicting requirements of rationality. Sidgwick's Ethics attempts to acquaint readers with the scholarly and theoretical debates relating to Sidgwick's theses, while providing readers with a greater appreciation of the depth and sophistication of Sidgwick's masterpiece.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in EthicsOnline ISBN: 9781108580588Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 27 March 2025
References
Brink, D. (1992). Sidgwick and the Rationale for Rational Egoism. In Schultz, Bart, ed., Essays on Henry Sidgwick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. (1994). Common Sense and First Principles in Sidgwick’s Methods. Social Philosophy and Policy, 11(1), 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, R. (2002). Sidgwick and the Boundaries of Intuitionism. In Stratton-Lake, Philip, ed., Ethical Intuitionism: Re-evaluations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–75.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. (2015). The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lazari-Radek, K. & Singer, P. (2014). The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick & Contemporary Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, A. (1992). Sidgwick and Whewellian Intuitionism: Some Enigmas. In Schultz, Bart, ed., Essays on Henry Sidgwick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Frankena, W. (1992). Sidgwick and the History of Ethical Dualism. In Schultz, Bart, ed., Essays on Henry Sidgwick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–98.Google Scholar
Hayward, F. H. (1901). The Ethical Philosophy of Sidgwick: Nine Essays, Critical and Expository, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Hurka, T. (2014a). Sidgwick on Consequentialism and Deontology: A Critique. Utilitas, 26(2), 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, T. (2014b). British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, T. (2009). The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Volume III: From Kant to Rawls, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). The Metaphysics of Morals, ed., Gregor, Mary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1997a). Lectures on Ethics, eds., Peter Heath and Schneewind, J. B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1997b). Critique of Practical Reason, ed., Gregor, Mary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, eds., Thomas E. Hill, Jr. and Arnulf Zweig, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2020). The Political Philosophy of Henry Sidgwick. Utilitas, 32(3), 261–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano-Okuno, M. (2011). Sidgwick and Contemporary Utilitarianism, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashdall, H. (1924). The Theory of Good and Evil: A Treatise on Moral Philosophy, Volume one, 2nd edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1974). The Independence of Moral Theory. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 48, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1977). Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, B. (2004). Henry Sidgwick: Eye of the Universe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, B. (2005). Sidgwick’s Racism. In Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios, eds., Utilitarianism and Empire. Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 211–50.Google Scholar
Schultz, B. (2017). The Happiness Philosophers: The Lives and Works of the Great Utilitarians, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaver, R. (1999). Rational Egoism: A Selective and Critical History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaver, R. (2014). Sidgwick’s Axioms and Consequentialism. Philosophical Review, 123(2), 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1870). The Ethics of Conformity and Subscription, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1876). PC. Professor Calderwood on Intuitionism in Morals. Mind, 1(4), 563–66.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1877). SE. Mr. Barratt on “The Suppression of Egoism.” Mind, 2(7), 411–12.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1879). FP. The Establishment of Ethical First Principles. Mind, 4(13), 106–11.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1882). CNSE. Critical Notice of Leslie Stephen, The Science of Ethics, Mind, 28(7), 572–86.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1889). FC. Some Fundamental Ethical Controversies. Mind, 14(56), 473–87.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1891–2). IO. Is the Distinction between “Is” and “Ought” Ultimate and Irreducible? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2(1), 88–92.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1898). PE. Practical Ethics: A Collection of Addresses and Essays, London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1902). OHE. Outlines of the History of Ethics for English Readers, 5th edn., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1902). GSM. Lectures on the Ethics of T. H. Green, Mr. Herbert Spencer, and J. Martineau, ed., Constance, E. E. Jones, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1902). PSR. Philosophy, Its Scope and Relations: An Introductory Course of Lectures, ed., Ward, James, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1905). LK. Lectures on the Philosophy of Kant and Other Philosophical Lectures and Essays, ed., Ward, James, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1981 [1907]). ME. The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn., Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1974). Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium. The Monist, 58(3), 490–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics, 3rd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, A. (2008). Sidgwick’s Philosophical Intuitions. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, 10(2), 185–209.Google Scholar
Skelton, A. (2010). Henry Sidgwick’s Moral Epistemology. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(4), 491–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, A. (2019). Late Utilitarian Moral Theory and Its Development: Sidgwick, Moore. In Shand, John, ed., A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, A. (2022). William David Ross. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/ENTRIES/william-david-ross/.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1956). Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly, 6(25), 344–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M. (2018). Time Biases: A Theory of Rational Planning and Personal Persistence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverdlik, S. (1985). Sidgwick’s Methodology. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 23(4), 537–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. (1995). The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics. In Bernard Williams, ed., Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar