Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-28T09:40:54.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Refugee Policies in East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

Petrice R. Flowers
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa

Summary

East Asia stands apart from the rest of Asia in the prevalence of the institutionalization of the 1951 Refugee Convention. Despite this widespread adoption of the Convention in East Asia, the record on implementation into domestic law and policy is uneven. This Element offers a comparative analysis of the gap between the institutionalization of the Refugee Convention and the implementation of refugee policy in China, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, and Mongolia. Specific attention is given to two key policy issues: refugee status determination—deciding who is granted government recognition as a refugee—and complementary forms of protection—protection based on statutes other than the Refugee Convention. This Element demonstrates that implementation of the Refugee Convention in East Asia depends on a vibrant civil society with the space and opportunity to engage with local UNHCR offices, local branches of international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs), and other stake holders.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781108999427
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 30 January 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 239275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akashi, Junichi. “Challenging Japan’s Refugee Policies.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 15, no. 2 (2006): 219238.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander. “The Unfinished Work of the Global Compact on Refugees.” International Journal of Refugee Law 30, no. 4 (2018): 611617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arakaki, Osamu. “Refugee Status in Japan: Change of Judicial Practice in the Democratic State.” Victoria University of Welington Law Review 38, no. 2 (August 2007): 281298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arakaki, Osamu, and Song, Lili. “Regional Refugee Regimes.” In Cathryn Costello, Michelle Foster, and Jane McAdam, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Aycock, Brian, and Hashimoto, Naoko. “Complementary Protection in Japan: To What Extent Does Japan Offer Effective International Protection for Those Who Fall outside the 1951 Refugee Convention?Laws 10, no. 16 (2021): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Kiran. “Rethinking the Global Governance of International Protection.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 56, no. 2 (2018): 313326.Google Scholar
Bari, Shamsul. “Refugee Status Determination under the Comprehensive Plan of Action (CPA): A Personal Assessment.” International Journal of Refugee Law 4, no. 4 (1992): 487513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Alexander, and Orchard, Phil, eds. Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boom, Chirstopher D.Beyond Persecution: A Moral Defense of Expanding Refugee Status.” International Journal of Refugee Law 30, no. 3 (2018): 512531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Elim, and Schloehardt, Andreas. “North Korean Refugees and International Refugee Law.” International Journal of Refugee Law 19, no. 2 (2007): 215245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T.International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide.European Journal of International Relations 3 (1997): 473495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, John W., and Fraser, Nicholas A. R.. “Japanese Newspaper Portrayals of Refugees – A Frame Analysis from 1985 to 2017.” Journal of Refugee Studies 35, no. 3 (September 2022): 13641385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Won Geun. “China and Its Janus-Faced Refugee Policy.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 26, no. 2 (2017): 224240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Won Geun. “Asian Civil Society and Reconfiguration of Refugee Protection in Asia.” Human Rights Review 20, no. 2 (2019): 161179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Won Geun. Advancing Refugee Protection from Bottom-Up: Case of the Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network (APRRN) PhD diss, (University of Hawai’i at Manoa, 2020).Google Scholar
Choi, Eunyoung Christina, and Yeon Park, Seo. “Threatened or Threatening?: Securitization of the Yemeni Asylum Seekers in South Korea.” Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 8, no. 1 (2020): 528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chun, Allen. “(Post)Colonial Governance in Hong Kong and Macau: A Tale of Two Cities and Regimes.” Postcolonial Studies 22, no. 4 (2019): 413427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Erin Aeran. Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Erin Aeran. “The Side Doors of Immigration: Multi-tier Migration Regimes in Japan and South Korea.” Third World Quarterly 43, no. 7 (2021): 117.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cathryn H. Sovereignty at the Edge: Macau and the Question of Chineseness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2010.Google Scholar
Costello, Cathryn, Nalule, Caroline and Derya, Ozkul. “Recognising Refugees: Understanding the Real Routes to Recognition.Forced Migration Review 65 (2020): 47.Google Scholar
Crawley, Heaven. “The Politics of Refugee Protection in a Post-Covid-19 World.” Social Sciences 10, no. 3 (2021): 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepin, Mathilde. “Extended Definitions of a Refugee and Complementary Forms of Protection: An Obsolete Polarisation between Two Different Approaches to International Protection.” King’s Student Law Review 7, no. 2 (2016): 119.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E.The Asian Rejection?: International Refugee Law in Asia.Australian Journal of Politics and History 52, no. 4 (2006): 562575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Sara E. Legitimising Rejection: International Refugee Law in Southeast Asia. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar
Dean, Meryll, and Nagashima, Miki. “Sharing the Burden: The Role of Government and NGOs in Protecting and Providing for Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Japan.” Journal of Refugee Studies 20, no. 3 (2007): 481508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Chun-yip Wilson, Pui-kei Charles Fung, Yuk-fai Peter Leung, Tsz-wai Alan Tam, Cheuk-kong Vincent Wong. Administering Asylum Seekers in Hong Kong: Government Policies and Action. Unpublished Thesis. University of Hong Kong, 2016.Google Scholar
Flowers, Petrice R.The International Refugee Convention: National Identity as a Limitation on Compliance.Crépeau, François, ed. Forced Migration and Global Processes: A View from Forced Migration Studies. New York: Lexington Books, 2006, 1334.Google Scholar
Flowers, Petrice R.Failure to Protect Refugees? Domestic Institutions, International Organizations, and Civil Society in Japan.” The Journal of Japanese Studies 34, no. 2 (2008): 333361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowers, Petrice R. Refugees, Women, and Weapons: International Norm Adoption and Compliance in Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Flowers, Petrice R.Crossing Borders: Transnationalism, Civil Society, and Post-9/11 Refugee Policy in Japan.Leheny, David and Warren, Kay, eds. Japanese Aid and the Construction of Global Development: Inescapable Solutions. New York: Routledge, 2010: 233251.Google Scholar
Flowers, Petrice R.International Human Rights Norms in Japan.” Human Rights Quarterly 38 (2016): 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Michelle. “Non-Refoulement on the Basis of Socio-Economic Deprivation: The Scope of Complementary Protection in International Human Rights Law,” New Zealand Law Review 2009, no. 2 (2009): 257310.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., and Rodley, Nigel S.. “After Bangladesh: The Law of Humanitarian Intervention by Military Force.American Journal of International Law 67, no. 2 (1973): 275305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bill., FrelickWhat’s Wrong with Temporary Protected Status and How to Fix It: Exploring a Complementary Protection Regime.” Journal on Migration and Human Security 8, no. 1 (2020): 4253.Google Scholar
Gil-Bazo, Maria-Teresa. “Refugee Protection under International Human Rights Law: From Non-Refoulement to Residence and Citizenship.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 34, no. 1 (2015): 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedde, Patricia. “Improving the Rights of Detained Asylum Seekers in South Korea.” Korea Observer 46, no. 1 (2015): 89115.Google Scholar
Goedde, Patricia. “Determining Refugee Status for North Korean Escapees under International and Domestic Laws.” Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies 11, no. 2 (2011): 143160.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy. “Forced migration: Refugees, rights and security.” In McAdam, Jane, ed. Forced migration, human rights and security. Oxford: Hart Publishing, (2008): 118.Google Scholar
Gorlick, Brian. “The Convention and the Committee against Torture: A Complementary Protection Regime for Refugees.” International Journal of Refugee Law 11 (1999): 479495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amy., GurowitzMobilizing International Norms: Domestic Actors, Immigrants, and the Japanese State.World Politics 51, no. 3 (1999): 413445.Google Scholar
Naoko., HashimotoStratification of Rights and Entitlements among Refugees and Other Displaced Persons in Japan.Takashi, Saul, ed. Civil and Political Rights in Japan. London: Routledge, 2019: 128142.Google Scholar
Hatcher, Pascale and Murakami, Aya. “The Politics of Exclusion: Embedded Racism and Japan’s Pilot Refugee Resettlement Programme.” Race & Class 62, no. 1 (2020): 6077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinae., HongThe Diplomatic Power of Small States: Mongolia’s Mediation on the Korean Peninsula.Australian Journal of International Affairs 76, no. 4 (2022): 415-431.Google Scholar
Hung, Jason. “Why Taiwan Should Develop Exclusive Refugee Laws for Hong Kong Political Asylum Seekers so as to Defy Beijing’s Interference.” Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal 7, no. 1 (2021): 173185.Google Scholar
Hyndman, Jennifer and Reynolds, Johanna. “Beyond the Global Compacts: Re-imagining Protection.” Refuge 36, no. 1 (2020): 6674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kailey Anne, Ibsen. “Refugee Law or Refugee Politics? The Varied Levels of China’s Hospitality towards North Korean, Kachin, and Vietnamese Refugees.Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 495 (2014): 134.Google Scholar
Ieong, Meng U. and Xiangning, Wu. “A Securitized ‘One Country, Two Systems’? Law as Social Control in Macau.” Asian Survey 61, no. 4 (2021): 663682.Google Scholar
Hyun, Im. “An Evaluation of Korea’s New Refugee Act and Future Challenges.” Korea Observer 43, no. 4 (Winter 2012): 587615.Google Scholar
Jones, Martin. “Refugee Status Determination: Three Challenges.” Forced Migration Review 32, no. 4 (2009): 5354.Google Scholar
Kalicki, Konrad. “Japan’s Liberal-Democratic Paradox of Refugee Admission.” The Journal of Asian Studies 78, no. 2 (2019): 355378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalicki, Konrad. “Fearful States: The Migration-Security Nexus in Northeast Asia.” The Pacific Review 35, no. 1 (2022): 5989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kironska, Kristina. “Taiwan’s Road to an Asylum Law: Who, When, How, and Why Not Yet?Human Rights Review 23, (2022): 241264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyun Mee. “‘Life on Probation’: Ambiguity in the Lives of Burmese Refugees in South Korea.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 21, no. 2 (2012): 217238.Google Scholar
Kim, Nora Hui-Jung.Cold War Refugees: South Korea’s Entry into the International Refugee Regime, 1950–1992.” Journal of Refugee Studies 35, no. 1 (March 2022): 435453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerwin, Donald. “How Robust Refugee Protection Policies Can Strengthen Human and National Security.” Journal on Migration and Human Security 4, no. 3 (2016): 83140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Damien, and Avonius, Leena, eds. Human Rights in Asia: A Reassessment of the Asian Values Debate. New York: Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Koizumi, Koichi. “Refugee Policy Formation in Japan: Developments and Implications.” Journal of Refugee Studies 5, no. 2 (1992): 123135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumbein, Frédéric. “Human Rights and Democracy in Taiwan’s Foreign Policy and Cross-Strait Relations.” International Journal of Taiwan Studies 2 (2019): 292320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Ada Pui Yim. “Refugees and Civic Stratification: The ‘Asian Rejection’ Hypothesis and Its Implications for Protection Claimants in Hong Kong.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 26, no. 2 (2017): 206223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jieun. “A Pressing Need for the Reform of Interpreting Service in Asylum Settings: A Case Study of Asylum Appeal Hearings in South Korea.” Journal of Refugee Studies 27, no. 1 (2014): 6281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Sang Kook. “The State, Ethnic Community, and Refugee Resettlement in Japan.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 53, no. 8 (2018): 12191234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yoonkyung. “Migration, Migrants, and Contested Ethno-Nationalism in Korea.” Critical Asian Studies 41, no. 3 (2009): 363380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John., Lie Multiethnic Japan. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
John., LieThe Discourse of Japaneseness.Douglass, Michael and Roberts, Glenda S., eds. Japan and Global Migration. London: Routledge, 2015: 69-88.Google Scholar
Lie, John, and Weng, Jeffrey. “East Asia.” In John Stone, Rutledge M. Dennis, and Xiaoshou Hou, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackewell Press 2020: 129146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, Matthew. “Philosophical Foundations for Complementary Protection.” In David Miller and Christine Straehle, eds. The Political Philosophy of Refuge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019: 211230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loper, Kelley. “Toward Comprehensive Refugee Legislation in Hong Kong: Reflections on Reform of the Torture Screening Procedures.” Hong Kong Law Journal 39, no. 2 (2009): 253260.Google Scholar
Loper, Kelley. “Human Rights, Non-Refoulement and the Protection of Refugees in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Refugee Law 22, no. 3 (2010): 404439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Helena F. S.The Impact of Refugees in Neutral Hong Kong and Macau, 1937–1945.” The Historical Journal 66 (2023): 210236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P.. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 943969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Jane. “Seeking Asylum under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Case for Complementary Protection.” International Journal of Children’s Rights 14, no. 3 (2006): 251274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Jane. Complementary Protection in International Refugee Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Jane. “From Humanitarian Discretion to Complementary Protection- Reflections on the Emergence of Human Rights-Based Refugee Protection in Australia.” Australian International Law Journal 18 (2011): 5376.Google Scholar
Jargalsaikhan., Mendee “Renewed Geopolitical Rivalries: Challenges and Options for Mongolia.” Mongolian Geopolitics (2022): 1628.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle.Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle.” American Anthropologist 108, no. 1 (2006): 3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. Human Rights & Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Morico, Rachel. “Response to the Syrian Refugee Crisis in Germany, the United States, and Japan: Who Should Be Prioritized in Light of International Obligations.” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 26, no. 1 (Winter 2017): 189210.Google Scholar
Morris-Suzuki, Tessa. Borderline Japan: Foreigners and Frontier Controls in the Postwar Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Mukae, Ryuji. Japan’s Refugee Policy: To Be of the World. Fucecchio, Italy: European Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Muntarbhorn, Vitit. The Status of Refugees in Asia. London: Clarendon Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy-Shigematsu, Stephen. “Multiethnic Japan and the Monoethnic Myth.” Melus 18, no. 4 (1993): 6380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nah, Alice M.Networks and Norm Entrepreneurship amongst Local Civil Society Actors: Advancing Refugee Protection in the Asia Pacific Region.The International Journal of Human Rights 20, no. 2 (2016): 223240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isabella, Ng, Fungyee Choi, Sharice and Lihshing Chan, Alex. “Framing the Issue of Asylum Seekers and Refugees for Tougher Refugee Policy – a Study of the Media’s Portrayal in Post-colonial Hong Kong.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 2019: 593617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Yeo Hoon Julie. “China’s Way out of the North Korean Refugee Crisis: Developing a Legal Framework for the Deportation of North Korean Migrants.” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 25, no. 2 (Winter 2011): 515532.Google Scholar
Prantl, Jochen and Ryoko, Nakano. “Global Norm Diffusion in East Asia: How China and Japan Implement the Responsibility to Protect”. International Relations 25, no. 2 (2011): 204223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ramsden, Michael and Marsh, Luke. “The Right to Work of Refugees in Hong Kong: MA v Director of Immigration.” International Journal of Refugee Law 25, 3 (2013): 574596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. “Cultural Diversity and International Order.” International Organization 71, no. 4 (2017): 851885, 875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatte, Hans and McCan, Jennifer. “The Pursuit of State Status and the Shift toward International Norms: South Korea’s Evolution as a Host Country for Refugees.” Journal of Refugee Studies 27, no. 3 (September 2014): 317337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schloenhardt, Andreas. “Immigration and Refugee Law in the Asia Pacific Region.” Hong Kong Law Journal 32, no. 3 (2002): 519548.Google Scholar
Siddikoglu, Hidayet. “Refugee and Asylum Seeking in Modern Japan: Analysis of Japan’s Humanitarian Commitments and Xenophobic Problems.” The Journal of Migration Studies 3, no. 2 (2017): 4064.Google Scholar
Simeon, James C.A Comparative Analysis of the Response of the UNHCR and Industrialized States to Rapidly Fluctuating Refugee Status and Asylum Applications: Lessons and Best Practices for RSD Systems Design and Administration.” International Journal of Refugee Law 22, no. 1 (2010): 72103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lili., SongWho Shall We Help? The Refugee Definition in a Chinese Context.Refugee Survey Quarterly 33, no. 1 (2014): 44-58.Google Scholar
Song, Lili. “Refugees or Border Residents from Myanmar? The Status of Displaced Ethnic Kachins and Kokangs in Yunnan Province, China.” International Journal of Refugee Law 29, no. 3 (2017): 466487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Lili. “China and the International Refugee Protection Regime: Past, Present, and Potentials.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 37 (2018): 139161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Lili. Chinese Refugee Law and Policy, 1949–2017. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Lili. “Shedding Light on RSD in China.” Forced Migration Review 65 (2020b): 1113.Google Scholar
Michael., Strausz Help (Not)Wanted: Immigration Politics in Japan. Albany: SUNY Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Suhrke, Astri. “The “High Politics” of Population Movements: Migration, State and Civil Society in Southeast Asia.” In Myron Weiner, ed. International Migration and Security. Boulder: Westview Press 1993: 179200.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E.Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion ‘From Below.’” International Organization 66 (2012): 179209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. “Human Rights and Minority Activism in Japan: Transformation of Movement Actorhood and Local-Global Feedback Loop.” American Journal of Sociology 122, no. 4 (2017): 10501103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, Andrew. “Korea’s Refugee Act: A Critical Evaluation under International Law.” Journal of East Asia and International Law 6, no. 2 (Autumn 2013): 479496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, Andrew, “Japan and International Refugee Protection Norms: Explaining Non-Compliance.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 24, no. 4 (2015): 409431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Mathew Y.H. and Ying-ho, Kwong. “One Formula, Different Trajectories: China’s Coalition-Building and Elite Dynamics in Hong Kong and Macau.Critical Asian Studies 52, no. 1 (2020): 44-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagami, Susumu. “Determination of Refugee Status in Japan.” International Journal of Refugee Law 7, no. 1 (1995): 6083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Refugee Policies in East Asia
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Refugee Policies in East Asia
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Refugee Policies in East Asia
Available formats
×