Element contents
Series: Elements in Austrian Economics
Public Debt as a Form of Public Finance
Overcoming a Category Mistake and its Vices
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 March 2019
Summary
Economists commit a category mistake when they treat democratic governments as indebted. Monarchs can be indebted, as can individuals. In contrast, democracies can't truly be indebted. They are financial intermediaries that form a bridge between what are often willing borrowers and forced lenders. The language of public debt is an ideological language that promotes politically expressed desires and is not a scientific language that clarifies the practice of public finance. Economists have gone astray by assuming that a government is just another person whose impulses toward prudent action will restrict recourse to public debt and induce rational political action.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Austrian EconomicsOnline ISBN: 9781108696050Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 30 May 2019
References
Backhaus, J. G. and Wagner, R. E. (1987). The Cameralists: A public choice perspective. Public Choice 53: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhause, R. E. and Medema, S. G. (2012). Economists and the analysis of government failure: fallacies in the interpretations of Cambridge welfare economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36: 981–94.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. (1996). Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J. (2007). Liberty vs. power in economic policy in the 20th and 21st centuries. Journal of Private Enterprise 22: 7–36.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J. (2018). F. A. Hayek: Economics, Political Economy, and Social Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1956). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, E. R. (1997). The tragedy of the public budgetary commons. The Independent Review 1: 353–70.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1949). The pure theory of public finance: a suggested approach. Journal of Political Economy 57: 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1958). Public Principles of Public Debt. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1960). The Italian tradition in fiscal theory. In Buchanan, J. M., ed., Fiscal Theory and Political Economy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 24–74.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1967). Public Finance in Democratic Process. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., et al. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulow, J. and Rogoff, K. (1988). Sovereign debt: is to forgive to forget? American Economic Review 79: 43–50.Google Scholar
Bulow, J. and Rogoff, K. (1989). A constant recontracting model of sovereign debt. Journal of Political Economy 97: 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, G. (1988). Servicing public debt: the role of expectations. American Economic Review 78: 647–61.Google Scholar
Caplan, B. (2007). The Myth of the Rational Voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. (2011). Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Reform, Liberalism, and the Rise of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coyne, C. and Hall, A. (2018). Tyranny Comes Home: The Domestic Fate of U.S. Militarism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruces, J. and Trebesch, C. (2013). Sovereign defaults: the price of haircuts. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5: 85–117.Google Scholar
De Jouvenel, B. (1993 [1948]). On Power: The Natural History of its Growth. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
De Jouvenel, B. (1961). The chairman’s problem. American Political Science Review 55: 368–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Viti de Marco, A. (1888). Il carattere teorico dell’economia finanziaria. Rome: Pasqualucci.Google Scholar
De Viti de Marco, A. (1930). Un trentennio di lotte politiche. Roma: Collezione Meridionale Editrice.Google Scholar
De Viti de Marco, A. (1936). First Principles of Public Finance. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1897). The pure theory of taxation. Economic Journal 7: 100–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmett, R. N. (2006). De gustibus est disputandum: Frank H. Knight’s response to George Stigler and Gary Becker’s “De gustibus non est disputandum.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. A. 1995. Simple Rules for a Complex World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eusepi, G. and Wagner, R. E. (2013). Tax prices in a democratic polity: The continuing relevance of Antonio de Viti de Marco. History of Political Economy 45: 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eusepi, G. and Wagner, R. E. (2017). Public Debt: An Illusion of Democratic Political Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, C. (1981). Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garrison, R. (2001). Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. 2008. Rationality for Mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldscheid, R. 1917. Staatssozialismus oder Staatskapitalismus. Vienna: Brüder Suschitzky.Google Scholar
Greve, M. (2012). The Upside-Down Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, H. and Van Huyck, J. (1988). Sovereign debt as a contingent claim: excusable default, repudiation, and reputation. American Economic Review 78: 1088–97.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35: 519–30.Google Scholar
Higgs, R. (1997). Regime uncertainty: why the Great Depression lasted so long and why prosperity resumed after the war. The Independent Review 1: 561–90.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. G. (2002). From Liberty to Democracy: The Transformation of American Government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justi, J. H. G. (1771 [1969]). Natur und Wesen der Staaten. Darmstadt: Scientia Verlag Aalen.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Koppl, R. (2002). Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachmann, L. (1977). Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
Levine, M. E. and Plott, C. R. 1977. Agenda influence and its implications. Virginia Law Review 63: 561–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P. A. and Wagner, R. E. (2017). New Austrian macro theory: a call for inquiry. Review of Austrian Economics 30: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1958 [1919]). Just taxation: a positive solution. In Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T., eds., Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Macmillan, pp. 168–76.Google Scholar
Lovejoy., A. O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. 1935. The consumption of capital in Austria. Review of Economics and Statistics 17: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Vasquez, J. and Winer, S. L., eds. (2014). Coercion and Social Welfare in Public Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. D. (1965). Democracy, organization, and Michels. American Political Science Review 59: 417–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLure, M. (2007). The Paretian School and Italian Fiscal Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, S. G. (1996). Of Pangloss, Pigouvians, and pragmatism: Ronald Coase and social cost analysis. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18: 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, R. (1915 [1962]). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchic Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Miller, J. C. III. 1994. Fix the US Budget! Urgings of an Abominable No-Man. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Mirrlees, J. A. 1994. Optimal taxation and government finance. In Quigley, J. M. and Smolensky, E., eds. Modern Public Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 213–31.Google Scholar
Mosca, M. 2016. Antonio de Viti de Marco: a story worth remembering. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. (1939). The voluntary exchange theory of public economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 53: 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odom, J. (2019). Public Debt and the Common Good: Philosophical and Institutional Implications of Fiscal Imbalance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, G. (1977). Economics as a Coordination Problem. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1987). The Political Theory of a Compound Republic, 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1997). The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantaleoni, M. (1911). Considerazioni dulle proprieta di un sistema di prezzi politici. Giornale degli Economisti 42: 9–29, 114–33.Google Scholar
Patrick, M. and Wagner, R. E. (2015). From mixed economy to entangled political economy: a Paretian social-theoretic orientation. Public Choice 164: 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. R. and Levine, M. E. (1978). A model of agenda influence on committee decisions. American Economic Review 68: 146–60.Google Scholar
Podemska-Mikluch, M. and Wagner, R. E. 2013. Dyads, triads, and the theory of exchange. Review of Austrian Economics 26: 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primo, D. 2007. Rules and Restraint: Government Spending and the Design of Institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puviani, A. (1960). Die Illusionen in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Translated by Hartmann, M. and Rexhausen, F.. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal 37: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudla, R. (2010). Governing the budgetary commons: what can we learn from Elinor Ostrom? European Journal of Law and Economics 30: 201–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, W. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1978). Political resource allocation, controlled agenda, and the status quo. Public Choice 33: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, K. 1996. Keynes’s General Theory: a look at the criss-cross of reviews. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 18: 533–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salsman, R. M. (2017). The Political Economy of Public Debt. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 37: 350–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: a new branch of public finance. National Tax Journal 12: 340–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmölders, G. (1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft: Probleme der Finanzpsychologie. Hamburg: Rowahlt.Google Scholar
Schmookler, A. B. (1984). The Parable of the Tribes: The Problem of Power in Social Evolution. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954 [1918]). The crisis of the tax state. International Economic Papers 4: 5–38. Reprinted in Hickel (1976).Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1944). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Seater, J. J. (1993). Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Economic Literature 31: 142–90.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. (1968). Uncertainty in Economics and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R. (1981). Structure induced equilibrium and legislative choice. Public Choice 37: 503–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1937 [1776]). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Sterpan, I. and Wagner, R. E. (2017). The autonomy of the political in political economy. Advances in Austrian Economics 22: 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. and Becker, G. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76–90.Google Scholar
Telser, L. (1994). The usefulness of core theory in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, M. (2007). Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt across Three Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, K. (1984). Cameralism and the science of government. Journal of Modern History 56: 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veetil, V. and Wagner, R. E. (2018). Nominal GDP stabilization: chasing a mirage. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 67: 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (1986). Liability rules, fiscal institutions, and the debt. In Rowley, C. K. and Tollison, R. D., eds. Deficits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 374–90.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (1988). The Calculus of Consent: a Wicksellian retrospective. Public Choice 56: 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (1992). Grazing the federal budgetary commons: the rational politics of budgetary irresponsibility. Journal of Law and Politics 9: 105–19.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal Sociology and the Theory of Public Finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2012a). The Cameralists: fertile sources for a new science of public finance. In Backhaus, J. G., ed., Handbook of the History of Economic Thought. New York: Springer, pp. 123–35.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2012b). A macro economy as an ecology of plans. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 82: 433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2012c). Viennese kaleidics: why it’s liberty more than policy that calms turbulence. Review of Austrian Economics 25: 283–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2012d). Deficits, Debt, and Democracy: Wrestling with Tragedy on the Fiscal Commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2016). Politics as a Peculiar Business: Insights from a Theory of Entangled Political Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2017a). James M. Buchanan and Liberal Political Economy: A Rational Reconstruction. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. E. (2017b). Public Debt and the Corruption of Contract; published simultaneously as Il debito pubblico e la corruzione delle promesee. Milan: Bruno Leoni Institute.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. E. and Yazigi, D. (2014). Form vs. substance in selection through competition: elections, markets, and political economy. Public Choice 159: 503–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. L. 1982. The Crisis in Social Security: Economic and Political Origins. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1958). A new principle of just taxation. In Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T., eds., Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Macmillan, pp. 72–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, U. (1997). The Hayekian puzzle: spontaneous order and the business cycle. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 44: 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8
- Cited by