Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:28:11.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Phonetics

Phonetics and Phonology in Multilingual Language Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2023

Ulrike Gut ,
Romana Kopečková  and
Christina Nelson
Ulrike Gut
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Romana Kopečková
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Christina Nelson
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany

Summary

This Element focuses on phonetic and phonological development in multilinguals and presents a novel methodological approach to it within Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST). We will show how the traditional conceptualisations of acquisition with a strong focus on linear, incremental development with a stable endpoint can be complemented by a view of language development as emergent, self-organised, context-dependent and highly variable across learners. We report on a longitudinal study involving 16 learners with L1 German, L2 English and L3 Polish. Over their ten months of learning Polish, the learners' perception and production of various speech sounds and phonological processes in all of their languages were investigated. Auditory and acoustic analyses were applied together with group and individual learner statistical analyses to trace the dynamic changes of their multilingual phonological system over time. We show how phonetic and phonological development is feature-dependent and inter-connected and how learning experience affects the process.
Get access

Keywords

third language acquisitionspeech perceptionspeech productionmultilingualComplex Dynamic Systems Theory
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Phonetics
Online ISBN: 9781108992527
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 31 August 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amengual, M., Meredith, L., & Panelli, T. (2019). Static and dynamic phonetic interactions in the L2 and L3 acquisition of Japanese velar voiceless stops. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 964–8). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Ankerstein, C. A., & Morschett, R. (2013). Do you hear what I hear? A comparison of phoneme perception in native and Saarlandian German nonnative speakers of English. Saarland Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 1–8.Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. (2015). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 683–95.Google Scholar
Aoki, R., & Nishihara, F. (2013). Sound feature interference between two second languages: An expansion of the feature hypothesis to the multilingual situation in SLA. In Cathcart, C., Chen, I.-H., Finley, G. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 18–32). Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K., Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Yamada, T., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2008). The first years in an L2-speaking environment: A comparison of Japanese children and adults learning American English. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2008.003.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (2009). Phonological feature re-assembly and the importance of phonetic cues. Second Language Research, 25(2), 231–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100284.Google Scholar
Beckmann, E. (2012). ‘A gup of dea, please’: Crosslinguistic influence in English and German word-initial stops produced by German L3 learners of Dutch. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 252–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.1.2.06bec.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (6.2.03) [Computer software].Google Scholar
Cabrelli, J. (2016). Testing the phonological permeability hypothesis: L3 phonological effects on L1 versus L2 systems. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916637287.Google Scholar
Cabrelli, J., & Pichan, C. (2019). Initial phonological transfer in L3 Brazilian Portuguese and Italian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(2), 131–67. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18048.cab.Google Scholar
Cabrelli, J., & Rothman, J. (2010). On L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 275–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.012.Google Scholar
Cardoso, W. (2011). The development of coda perception in second language phonology: A variationist perspective. Second Language Research, 27(4), 433–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658311413540.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (2001). A practical introduction to phonetics (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cebrian, J. (2000). Transferability and productivity of L1 rules in Catalan–English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100001017.Google Scholar
Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L. (2015). Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65(2), 298–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12107.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Steele, J. (2008). Integrating articulatory constraints into models of second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 489–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080223.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., Steele, J., & Escudero, P. (2015). Second language speech: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690050.Google Scholar
de Bot, K. (2012). Rethinking multilingual processing: From a static to a dynamic approach. In Cabrelli, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (Vol. 46, pp. 79–94). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.46.07bot.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In Verspoor, M., de Bot, K. & Lowie, W. (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5–24). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29.01deb.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic view as a complementary perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(01), 51–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2010). Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 483–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.06.001.Google Scholar
Dong, J. (2016). A dynamic systems theory approach to development of listening strategy use and listening performance. System, 63, 149–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.10.004.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1981). On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules. Language Learning, 31(1), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01379.x.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406–EL412. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3701708.Google Scholar
Evans, D. R., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Bifurcations and the emergence of L2 syntactic structures in a Complex Dynamic System. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 574603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574603.Google Scholar
Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2016). An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(1), EL1–EL5. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4939608.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233–77). York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T. & Rohde, A. (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 217–44). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Schiller, N. O. & Meyer, A. S. (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production (pp. 319–58). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895094.319.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R. (Ed.), Second language speech learning (1st ed., pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 527–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101004041.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14(1), 3–28.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., Kupisch, T., & Seoudy, J. (2016). VOT in French as a foreign language: A production and perception study with mono- and multilingual learners (German/Mandarin-Chinese). SHS Web of Conferences, 27, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162709002.Google Scholar
García Lecumberri, M., & Gallardo, F. (2003). English FL sounds in school learners of different ages. In del Pilar Garcia, M. Mayo & Lecumberri, M. Garcia (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 115–35). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. (2010). Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902972248.Google Scholar
Hamann, S., & Sennema, A. (2005). Acoustic differences between German and Dutch labiodentals. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 42, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.42.2005.272.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (2017). Becoming multilingual: The macro and the micro time perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 55(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0010.Google Scholar
Hanulíková, A., van Alphen, P. M., van Goch, M. M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 878–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00103.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099–111. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872.Google Scholar
Huang, T., Steinkrauss, R., & Verspoor, M. (2020). Learning an L2 and L3 at the same time: Help or hinder? International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(4), 566–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1779726.Google Scholar
Hufeisen, B. (2010). Theoretische Fundierung multiplen Sprachlernens – Faktorenmodell 2.0. Jahrbuch Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 36(1), 200–7.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008). Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1305–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1305.Google Scholar
Jassem, W. (2003). Polish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33(1), 103–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100303001191.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. (1999). German. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (pp. 86–9). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R. (2014). Crosslinguistic influence in instructed L3 child phonological acquisition. In Pawlak, M. & Aronin, L. (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism (pp. 205–24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_12.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R. (2016). The bilingual advantage in L3 learning: A developmental study of rhotic sounds. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 410–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1217605.Google Scholar
Kopečková, R., Marecka, M., Wrembel, M., & Gut, U. (2016). Interactions between three phonological subsystems of young multilinguals: The influence of language status. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(4), 426. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1217603.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=ZzYGAQAAIAAJ.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp043.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00714.x.Google Scholar
Lima, R. M. Jr. (2013). Complexity in second language phonology acquisition. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13(2), 549–76.Google Scholar
Lima, R. M. Jr., & Alves, U. K. (2019). A dynamic perspective on L2 pronunciation development: Bridging research and communicative teaching practice. Revista do GEL, 16(2), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., & Cardoso, W. (2018). Revisiting (non-)native influence in VOT production: Insights from advanced L3 Spanish. Languages, 3(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3030030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L. (2010). The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902972255.Google Scholar
Llama, R., & López-Morelos, L. P. (2016). VOT production by Spanish heritage speakers in a trilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 444–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1217602.Google Scholar
Lowie, W. (2011). Early L2 phonology: A dynamic approach. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., Wrembel, M., & Kul, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th New Sounds 2010 (pp. 159–70). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lowie, W. (2017). Lost in state space? Methodological considerations in Complex Dynamic Theory approaches to second language development research. In Ortega, L. & Han, Z. (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 123–41). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.07low.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (2002). The phonology of the L2 user. In Cook, V. (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 65–92). Multilingual Matters. https://books.google.de/books?id=FDmcuWKqmzwC&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales Reyes, A., Arechabaleta-Regulez, B., & Montrul, S. A. (2017). The acquisition of rhotics by child L2 and L3 learners. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 242–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.04rey.Google Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2018). Examining the temporal structure of the perception-production link in second language acquisition: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(1), 234–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12275.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. (2020). The younger, the better? Speech perception development in adolescent vs. adult L3 learners. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 6(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/yplm-2020-0005.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. (2022). Do a learner’s background languages change with increasing exposure to L3? Comparing the multilingual phonological development of adolescents and adults. Languages, 7(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020078.Google Scholar
Pascoe, G. (1987). Die Aussprache des Englischen an bayerischen Schulen: Untersuchungen an Gymnasien, Realschulen und Hauptschulen. Profil.Google Scholar
Patience, M. (2018). Acquisition of the tap-trill contrast by L1 Mandarin–L2 English–L3 Spanish speakers. Languages, 3(4), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3040042.Google Scholar
Penris, W., & Verspoor, M. (2017). Academic writing development: A complex, dynamic process. In Pfenninger, S. E. & Navracsics, J. (Eds.), Future research directions for applied linguistics (pp. 215–42). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, S. (2021). About the INTER and the INTRA in age-related research: Evidence from a longitudinal CLIL study with dense time serial measurements. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(2), 2020–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0028.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2015). Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes: A ‘back-to-basics’ approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research. In Plonsky, L. (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 23–45). Routledge.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, D. M. (2021). Third language acquisition: A study of unstressed vowel reduction. Doctoral thesis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (2004). British English: Received pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100304001768.Google Scholar
Rubach, J. (1984). Cyclic and lexical phonology: The structure of Polish. Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1984). Phonological processes in second language acquisition: Another look at interlanguage syllable structure. Language Learning, 34(4), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00351.x.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1999). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations (4th ed.). Longman.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Y., Han, C., & Hestvik, A. (2019). Effects of perceptual assimilation: The perception of English /æ/, /ʌ/, AND /ɑ/ by Japanese speakers. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 603–8). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L., Bruss, M., Hayes-Harb, R., & Hamilton, A. (2007). Voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(5), 3032. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2942851.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L., & Peterson, E. A. (2012). Native English speakers learning German as a second language: Devoicing of word-final voiced stop targets. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), 2523. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3655068.Google Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq001.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (2000). Acoustic phonetics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech perception in late second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. In Hansen, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 153–191). John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Sypiańska, J. (2016). L1 vowels of multilinguals: The applicability of SLM in multilingualism. Research in Language, 14(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0003.Google Scholar
Sypiańska, J. (2017). Cross-linguistic influence in bilinguals and multilinguals. Doctoral thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, H. (1990). Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(1), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399849.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. E. (2021). Change-Point Analyzer 2.3 [Computer software]. https://variation.com.Google Scholar
Tyler, M. D. (2019). PAM-L2 and phonological category acquisition in the foreign language classroom. In Nyvad, A. M., Hejná, M., Højen, A., Jespersen, A. B., & Sørensen, M. H. (Eds.), A sound approach to language matters: In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 607–30). Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Tyler, M. D. (2021). Phonetic and phonological influences on the discrimination of non-native phones. In Wayland, R. (Ed.), Second language speech learning (1st ed., pp. 157–74). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.005.Google Scholar
van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.506.Google Scholar
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability and DST. In Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29.04van.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.). (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2014). VOT patterns in the acquisition of third language phonology. Concordia Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 751–71. http://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl:8080/bitstream/10593/12094/1/COPAL_paper_51-Wrembel%2C%20M.pdf.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2015). Cross-linguistic influence in second vs. third language acquisition of phonology. In Gut, U., Fuchs, R., & Wunder, E.-M. (Eds.), Universal or diverse paths to English phonology (pp. 41–70). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346084-004.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M., Marecka, M., & Kopečková, R. (2019). Extending perceptual assimilation model to L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 513–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1583233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, H., & Lowie, W. (2019). Dynamic paths of complexity and accuracy in second language speech: A longitudinal case study of Chinese learners. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 855–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz040.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Phonetics and Phonology in Multilingual Language Development
  • Ulrike Gut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany, Romana Kopečková, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany, Christina Nelson, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
  • Online ISBN: 9781108992527
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Phonetics and Phonology in Multilingual Language Development
  • Ulrike Gut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany, Romana Kopečková, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany, Christina Nelson, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
  • Online ISBN: 9781108992527
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Phonetics and Phonology in Multilingual Language Development
  • Ulrike Gut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany, Romana Kopečková, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany, Christina Nelson, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
  • Online ISBN: 9781108992527
Available formats
×