Element contents
Series: Elements in Business Strategy
Microfoundations
Nature, Debate, and Promise
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2019
Summary
'Microfoundations' has become prominent in the discourse of management scholars. But what is it and how does it matter? This Element provides a characterization of microfoundations based on classical work on the methodology of social science and documents and discusses its manifestations in management research over the last one and a half decades. It also covers the relation of microfoundations to multilevel research, criticisms of microfoundations, and empirical research strategies for microfoundations.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Business StrategyOnline ISBN: 9781108685498Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 28 November 2019
References
Abell, P. (2004). Narrative explanation: An alternative to variable-centered explanation? Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 287–310.Google Scholar
Abell, P. (2011). Singular mechanisms and Bayesian narratives, in Demeulenaere, P. (ed.). Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 121–35.Google Scholar
Abell, P., and Engel, O. (2018). The Coleman Diagram, Small N Inquiry and Ethnographic Causality. Working Paper, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Abell, P., Felin, T., and Foss, N. (2008). Building microfoundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassi, J. (1960). Methodological individualism. British Journal of Sociology, 11, 244–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, V., Posen, H. E., and Workiewicz, M. (2017). Adaptive capacity to technological change: A microfoundational approach. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 1212–31.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., Boyd, B. K., Pierce, C. A., and Short, J. C. (2011). Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains. Journal of Management, 37, 395–403.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., and Edwards, J. R. (2014). Methodological wishes for the next decade and how to make wishes come true. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 143–74.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., and Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2015). Using multilevel modeling and mixed methods to make theoretical progress in microfoundations for strategy research. Strategic Organization, 13, 353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aime, F., Johnson, S., and Ridge, J. W. (2010). The routine may be stable but the advantage is not: Competitive implications of key employee mobility. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 75–87.Google Scholar
Anand, V., Ashford, B. E., Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2), 9–23.Google Scholar
Argote, L., and Ren, Y. (2012). Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1375–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., and Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., and Nickerson, J. A. (2013). Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bapuji, H., Hora, M., and Saeed, A. M. (2012). Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: Examining the emergence of routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1586–607.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–121.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., and Felin, T. (2013). What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138–55.Google Scholar
Barr, A., and Serra, D. (2010). Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11–12), 862–69.Google Scholar
Battilana, J., Leca, B., and Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T., and Sandelin, M. (2016). Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besedeš, T., Deck, C., Sarangi, S., and Shor, M. (2015). Reducing choice overload without reducing choices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(4), 793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitektine, A., and Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, N. and van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 144: 1351–408.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 1–21.Google Scholar
Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R., and Durand, R. (2017). Heterogeneous social motives and interactions: The three predictable paths of capability development. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1755–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridoux, F., and Stoelhorst, J. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 107–25.Google Scholar
Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J., and Nahapiet, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
Burk, W. J., Steglich, C. E. G., and Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., Chaudhuri, A., Erkal, N., and Gangadharan, L. (2009). Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7–8), 843–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. A., Coff, R., and Kryscynski, D. (2010). Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review, 37, 376–95.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. A., Ganco, M., Franco, A. M., and Agarwal, R. (2010). Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effect on source firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 65–87.Google Scholar
Cardinaels, E., and van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G. (2010). Financial versus non-financial information: The impact of information organization and presentation in a balanced scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 565–78.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2018). Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 43, 132–55.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–95.Google Scholar
Chadwick, I. C., and Raver, J. L. (2015). Motivating organizations to learn: Goal orientation and its influence on organizational learning. Journal of Management, 41(3), 957–86.Google Scholar
Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., and Roberts, R. W. (2015). CSR disclosure: The more things change … ? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coff, R., and Kryscynski, D. (2011). Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37, 1429–43.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. (2012). Perceiving and remembering routine action: Fundamental micro-level origins. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1383–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crook, R. T., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., and Ketche, D. J. Jr (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443–56.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dai, Y., Roundy, P. T., Chok, J. I., Ding, F., and Byun, G. (2016). ‘Who knows what?’ in new venture teams: Transactive memory systems as a micro-foundation of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 1320–47.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
de Massis, A., and Foss, N. J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31(4), 386–96.Google Scholar
Deng, M., Lu, T., Simunic, D. A., and Ye, M. (2014). Do joint audits improve or impair audit quality? Journal of Accounting Research, 52, 1029–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denyer, D., and Tranfield, D. (2008). Producing a systematic review, in Buchanan, D. (ed.). The Sage Handbook of Organization Research Methods. London: Sage, 671–89.Google Scholar
Dessein, W., Galeotti, A., and Santos, T. (2016). Rational inattention and organizational focus. American Economic Review, 106(6), 1522–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dassein, W., and Santos, T. (2006). Adaptive organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 114(5), 956–95.Google Scholar
Devinney, T. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devinney, T. (2013). Is microfoundational thinking critical to management thought and practice? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 81–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyllick, T., and Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebers, M., and Maurer, I. (2014). Connections count: How relational embeddedness and relational empowerment foster absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43, 318–32.Google Scholar
Eckardt, R., Crocker, A., Ahn, Y., et al. (2018). Reflections on the micro-macro divide: Ideas from the trenches and moving forward. Strategic Organization, 17(3), 385–402.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K., Furr, N. R., and Bingham, C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21, 1263–73.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, J. M. (2006). Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, B. (2015). The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., and Tyran, J. R. (2005). Individual rationality and aggregate outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 43–66.Google Scholar
Felin, T., and Foss, N. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3, 441–55.Google Scholar
Felin, T., and Foss, N. (2006). Individuals and organizations: Thoughts on a microfoundations project for strategic management and organizational analysis. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 3, 253–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., and Foss, N. (2011). The endogenous origins of organizational experience, routines and capabilities: The poverty of stimulus. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 231–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., and Foss, N. (2012). The (proper) microfoundations of routines and capabilities: A response to Winter, Pentland, Hodgson and Knudsen. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8, 271–88.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N., Heimeriks, K., and Madsen, T. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351–74.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N.J., and Ployhart, R. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632.Google Scholar
Felin, T., and Hesterly, W. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32, 195–218.Google Scholar
Felin, T., and Spender, J.-C. (2009). An exchange of ideas about knowledge governance: Seeking first principles and microfoundations, in Foss, N. J., and Michailova, S. (eds), Knowledge Governance: Processes and Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–71.Google Scholar
Felin, T., and Zenger, T. R. (2011). Information aggregation, matching and radical market–hierarchy hybrids: Implications for the theory of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9, 163–73.Google Scholar
Fišar, M., Kubák, M., Špalek, J., and Tremewan, J. (2016). Gender differences in beliefs and actions in a framed corruption experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 63, 69–82.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J. (2003). Selective intervention and internal hybrids: Interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon spaghetti organization. Organization Science, 14, 331–49.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J. (2012). Theory of science perspectives on strategic management: Debates and a novel view, in Dagnino, G. B. (ed.), Elgar Handbook of Research on Competitive Strategy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., Husted, K., and Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 455–82.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., and Lindenberg, S. (2013). Micro-foundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 85–102.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., Lindenberg, S. M., and Weber, L. L. (2019). Employees behaving badly: How opportunism differs across hierarchical forms (and how to handle it). Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.15882abstract.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., and Linder, S. (2019). The changing nature of the corporation and the economic theory of the firm, in: Clarke, T., O’Brien, J., and O’Kelley, C. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 539–61.Google Scholar
Foss, J. N., and Lyngsie, J. (2017). The more, the merrier? Women in top-management teams and entrepreneurship in established firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 484–505.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., and Pedersen, T. (2004). Governing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 339–49.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., and Pedersen, T. (2019). Microfoundations in international management research: Individuals and contextual determinants of knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., and Weber, L. (2016). Moving opportunism to the back seat: Bounded rationality, costly conflict, and hierarchical forms. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409–21.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., and Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337–59.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., and Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘The corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–69.Google Scholar
Friedland, R., and Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions, in: Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. J. (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 232–63.Google Scholar
Garriga, E., and Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16, 599–617.Google Scholar
Gavetti, G. (2012). Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1), 267–85.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalg, O., and Zollo, M. (2007). Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 418–37.Google Scholar
Grabner, I., and Moers, F. (2013). Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6–7), 407–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, L. J. (1993). Narrative, event-structure analysis, and causal interpretation in historical sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1094–133.Google Scholar
Grigoriou, K., and Rothaermel, F. T. (2014). Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. Journal of Management, 40(2), 586–615.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R., and Cummings, J. N. (2015). Barriers to knowledge seeking within MNC teams: Which differences matter most?Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 36–62.Google Scholar
Hallberg, N. L. (2017). The micro-foundations of pricing strategy in industrial markets: A case study in the European packaging industry. Journal of Business Research, 76, 179–88.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., and Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
Harmon, D., Haack, P., and Roulet, T. J. (2019). Microfoundations of institutions: A matter of structure vs. agency or level of analysis? Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 464–7.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., and Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 58–74.Google Scholar
Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: Some theory and implications. The Economic Journal, 105, 678–89.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1973). Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., and Klayman, J. (1998). Cognitive repairs: How organizational practices can compensate for individual shortcomings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 1–37.Google Scholar
Heath, C., and Sitkin, S. (2001). Big-B versus big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2, 43–58.Google Scholar
Hedström, P., and Swedberg, R. (1996). Social mechanisms. Acta Sociologica, 39(3), 281–308.Google Scholar
Heise, D. (1989). Modeling event structures. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 14, 139–69.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., and Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–50.Google Scholar
Hendry, J. (2002). The principal’s other problems: Honest incompetence and the specification of objectives. Academy of Management Review, 27, 98–113.Google Scholar
Hitt, M., Beamish, P., Jackson, S., and Mathieu, J. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academic Management Journal, 50, 1385–99.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2007). Meanings of methodological individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(2), 211–26.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2012). The mirage of microfoundations. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G., and Knudsen, T. (2011). Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause: Some questions for Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 295–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., and Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research, in Klein, K. J., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. (eds), Multilevel Theory, Resarch, and Methods in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 467–511.Google Scholar
Holmström, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74–91Google Scholar
Homburg, C., Artz, M., and Wieseke, J. (2012). Marketing performance measurement systems: does comprehensiveness really improve performance? Journal of Marketing, 76, 56–77.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1777). Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, Reprinted from the 1777 edition, third ed., Nidditch, P. H. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, S. E., and LeBreton, J. M. (2019). Introduction, in: Humphrey, S. E., and LeBreton, J. M. (eds), The Handbook of Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 3–8.Google Scholar
Hutzschenreuter, T., and Horstkotte, J. (2013). Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 704–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobides, M. G., and Winter, S. G. (2012). Capabilities: Structure, agency, and evolution. Organization Science, 23(5), 1213–522.Google Scholar
James, L. R., and Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096–12.Google Scholar
Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., Ng, V., and Woo, S. (2019). Construct validation in multilevel studies, in in: Humphrey, S. E., and LeBreton, J. M. (eds), The Handbook of Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 253–78.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–60.Google Scholar
Jepperson, R., and Meyer, J. (2011). Multiple levels of analysis and the limitations of methodological individualisms. Sociological Theory, 29, 54–73.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, V. (2007). What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 97–113.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard–measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–9.Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y., Howard, M., Pahnke, E. C., and Boeker, W. (2016). Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 22–44.Google Scholar
Kincaid, H. (1997). Individualism and the Unity of Science: Essays on Reduction, Explanation, and the Special Sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Klein, K., and Kozlowski, S. (eds) (2000). Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 3–90.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., and Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–45.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S., and Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergence processes, in Klein, K. J., and Kozlowski, S. W. (eds), Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 3–90.Google Scholar
Krasikova, D. V., and LeBreton, J. M. (2019). Multilevel measurement: Agreement, reliability, and nonindependence, in Humphrey, S. E., and LeBreton, J. M. (eds), The Handbook of Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 279–304.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, in Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press, 91–196.Google Scholar
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). Causes and consequences of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries? in Rose-Ackermann, S. (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar Publishing, 3–51Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., and Peeters, C. (2011). Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation, in Lewis, D. (ed.), Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 214–40.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S., and Foss, N. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: the role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36, 500–25.Google Scholar
Linder, S., and Foss, N. J. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational goals: A review and new directions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(S1), S39–S62.Google Scholar
Linder, S., Foss, N. J., and Stea, D. (2017). Epistemics at work: The theory of mind in principal-agent relations, in Hitt, M. A.et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Strategy Implementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–25.Google Scholar
Linder, S., Lyngsie, J., Foss, N. J., and Zahra, S. (2015). Wise choices: How thoroughness of opportunity appraisal, incentives, and performance evaluation fit together. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(4), 484–94.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. A., and Rumelt, R. P. (2003a). A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1069–86.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. A., and Rumelt, R. P. (2003b). The payments perspective: Micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 903–27.Google Scholar
Little, D. (1991). Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Little, D. (1998). Microfoundations, Method, and Causation. New Brunwick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Longford, N. (1986). VARCL – Interactive software for variance component analysis: Applications for survey data. Professional Statistician, 5, 28–33.Google Scholar
Maak, T., Pless, N. M., and Voegtlin, C. (2016). Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro‐foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 463–93.Google Scholar
Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.Google Scholar
Macy, M. W., and Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143–66.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, K., Sumelius, J., Höglund, M., and Ahlvik, C. (2012). Determinants of strategic HR capabilities in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1459–83.Google Scholar
Malmi, T., and Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package –Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19, 287–300.Google Scholar
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschak, J., and Radner, R. (1972). Economic Theory of Teams. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Martinkenaite, I., and Breunig, K. J. (2016). The emergence of absorptive capacity through micro–macro level interactions. Journal of Business Research, 69, 700–8.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., and Chen, G. (2011). The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 610–41.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J., and Luciano, M. M. (2019). Multilevel emergence in work collectives, in Humphrey, S. E., and LeBreton, J. M. (eds), The Handbook of Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 163–86.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., and Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matten, D., and Moon, J. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–24.Google Scholar
McKelvey, B., and Andriani, P. (2005). Why Gaussian statistics are mostly wrong for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 3, 219–28.Google Scholar
McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–27.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1883 [1985]). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences, with Special Reference to Economics. Schneider, L. (ed.), translated by Francis J. Nock. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mertens, K. G., Lorscheid, I., and Meyer, M. (2017). Using structural equation-based metamodelling for agent-based models, in Chan, W. K. V., D’Ambrogio, A., Zacharewicz, G., Mustafee, N., Wainer, G., and Page, E. (eds), Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington, DC: IEEE, 1372–82.Google Scholar
Meuer, J., and Rupietta, C. (2017). Integrating QCA and HLM for multilevel research on organizational configurations. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 324–42.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Miller, K. D., Choi, S., and Pentland, B. T. (2014). The role of transactive memory in the formation of organizational routines. Strategic Organization, 12(2), 109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K., Pentland, B., and Choi, S. (2012). Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1536–58.Google Scholar
Mollick, E. (2012). People and process, suits and innovators: the role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1001–15.Google Scholar
Molloy, J. C., Ployhart, R. E., and Wright, P. M. (2011). The myth of ‘the’ micro-macro divide: Bridging system-level and disciplinary divides. Journal of Management, 37, 581–609.Google Scholar
Morris, S., Hammond, R., and Snell, S. (2014). A microfoundations approach to transnational capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 405–27.Google Scholar
Morris, S. S., Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., and Molloy, J. C. (2017). Firm-specific human capital investments as a signal of general value: Revisiting assumptions about human capital and how it is managed. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 912–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münscher, R., Vetter, M., and Scheuerle, T. (2015). A review and taxonomy of choice architecture techniques. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 511–24.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nezlek, J. B. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 842–60.Google Scholar
Nickerson, J., and Zenger, T. (2008). Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1371–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, W., and MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of ‘triple bottom line’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–62.Google Scholar
Obloj, T., and Zemsky, P. (2015). Value creation and value capture under moral hazard: Exploring the micro‐foundations of buyer–supplier relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1146–63.Google Scholar
Ostroff, C., and Bowen, D. E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness, in Klein, K. J., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. (eds), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 211–66.Google Scholar
Paldam, M. (2002). The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(2), 215–40.Google Scholar
Paruchuri, S., and Eisenman, M. (2012). Microfoundations of firm R&D capabilities: A study of inventor networks in a merger. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1509–35.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. (2011). The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organization Science, 22, 1369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B., Feldman, M., Becker, M., and Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1484–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera Aldama, L., and Zicari, A. (2012). Value-added reporting as a tool for sustainability: A Latin American experience. Corporate Governance, 12(4), 485–98.Google Scholar
Peteraf, M. A., and Barney, J. B. (2003). Unravelling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 309–23.Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., and Hendricks, J. (2019). The missing levels in microfoundations, in Humphrey, S. E., and LeBreton, J. M. (eds), The Handbook of Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 141–62.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1979). The structure within industries and companies’ performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214–27.Google Scholar
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., and Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1369–86.Google Scholar
Raffiee, J., and Coff, R. (2016). Micro-foundations of firm-specific human capital: When do employees perceive their skills to be firm-specific? Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 766–90.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. (1992). ‘Casing’ and the process of social inquiry, in Ragin, C. C., and Becker, H. S. (eds), What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–26.Google Scholar
Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V., Audousset-Coulier, S., Kettunen, J., and Lesage, C. (2013). Joint Audit: Issues and Challenges for Researchers and Policy-Makers. Accounting in Europe, 10(2), 175–99.Google Scholar
Rogan, M., and Mors, M. L. (2014). A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations. Organization Science, 25(6), 1573–1877.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., and Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–13.Google Scholar
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., and Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95.Google Scholar
Salvato, C., and Rerup, C. (2018). Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 170–209.Google Scholar
Satz, D., and Ferejohn, J. (1994). Rational choice and social theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(2), 71–87.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. (1980). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, second ed. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Serra, D. (2011). Combining top-down and bottom-up accountability: Evidence from a bribery experiment. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 28(3), 569–87.Google Scholar
Silberstein, M. D. (2002). Reduction, emergence and explanation, in Machamer, P., and Silberstein, M. (eds), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.Google Scholar
Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45–62.Google Scholar
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R. S. (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Staats, B. R., Milkman, K. L., and Fox, C. R. (2012). The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 132–42.Google Scholar
Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Gift giving, bribery and corruption: Ethical management of business relationships in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 121–32.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations, in March, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. New York: Rand McNally, 142–93.Google Scholar
Stirling, W. C., and Felin, T. (2013). Game theory, conditional preferences and social influence. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e56751.Google Scholar
Strauss, K., Lepoutre, J., and Wood, G. (2017). Fifty shades of green: How microfoundations of sustainability dynamic capabilities vary across organizational contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 1338–55.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (2016). Ontology, methodological individualism, and the foundations of the social sciences. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(4), 1377–89.Google Scholar
Sunder, S., and Gode, D. (1993). Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy, 101(1), 119–37.Google Scholar
Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–50.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., and Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuncdogan, A., Boon, A., Mom, T., van den Bosch, F., and Volberda, H. (2017). Management teams’ regulatory foci and organizational units’ exploratory innovation: The mediating role of coordination mechanisms. Long Range Planning, 50, 621–35.Google Scholar
Udehn, L. (2001). Methodological Individualism: Background, History and Meaning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Udehn, L. (2002). The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 479–507.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., and Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. (1979). Microfoundations: The Compatibility of Microeconomics and Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–80.Google Scholar
Whetten, D., Felin, T., and King, B. (2009). The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 35, 537–63.Google Scholar
Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., and Dowling, G. R. (2016). The architecture of dynamic capability research: Identifying the building blocks of a configurational approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 997–1076.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1996). Efficiency, power, authority and economic organization, in Groenewegen, J. (ed.),Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond. New York, Springer, 11–43.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2011). Problems at the foundation? Comments on Felin and Foss. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 257–77.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2012a). Capabilities: Their origins and ancestry. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1402–6.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2012b). Purpose and progress in the theory of strategy: Comments on Gavetti. Organization Science, 23, 1213–26.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2013). Habit, deliberation and action: Strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 120–37.Google Scholar
Wright, P., Coff, R., and Moliterno, T. (2014). Strategic human capital: Crossing THE Great divide. Journal of Management, 14, 353–70.Google Scholar
Yao, F. K., and Chang, S. (2017). Do individual employees’ learning goal orientation and civic virtue matter? A micro-foundations perspective on firm absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 2041–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerni, M., Haapamäki, E., Järvinen, T., and Niemi, L. (2012). Do joint audits improve audit quality? Evidence from voluntary joint audits. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 731–65.Google Scholar
- 27
- Cited by