Element contents
Maximos the Confessor
Androprimacy and Sexual Difference
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2025
Summary
Maximos affirms in various texts (such as Difficulty 41) that sexual differentiation into male and female is inconsistent with the divine intention and will therefore be eschatologically eradicated. His affirmations have elicited a half-dozen conflicting interpretations, such as the metaphorization of these statements, where 'male' refers to drive (thymos) and 'female' to desire (epithymia), which become subordinate to reason (logos). Others maintain that he refers to the resolution of male–female agonistics. Yet others have criticized accounts that mollify the starkness of Maximos' affirmations. This Element goes further in arguing that Maximos tacitly envisions the elimination of sexual difference as sublimation of all sexual difference into male singularity. This Element overviews the exegetical and medical-anthropological precedents that framed Maximos thinking on this subject and examines some of his key texts, including his famed Difficulty 41 and several passages centered on explicating Eve and Adam, and Mary and Christ.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009492188Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 20 March 2025
Bibliography
Aimilianos of Simonopetra. The Mystical Marriage: Spiritual Life according to St. Maximos the Confessor. Columbia, NY: Newrome Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Andreou, Andria. “‘Emotioning’ Gender,” in Emotions and Gender in Byzantine Culture, Constantinou, Stavroula and Meyer, Mati, eds. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan, 2019, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. Kosmische Liturgie: Das Weltbild Maximus’ des Bekenners. Einsiedeln: Johannes-Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar
Behr, John. Asceticism and Anthropology in Irenaeus and Clement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, George. “Did Maximus the Confessor Know Augustine?” Studia Patristica 17.1 (1982): 14–17.Google Scholar
Betancourt, Roland. Byzantine Intersectionality: Sexuality, Gender, and Race in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Blowers, Paul. “Gentiles of the Soul: Maximus the Confessor on the Substructure and Transformation of Human Passions,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 4.1 (1996): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowers, Paul “The Dialectics and Therapeutics of Desire in Maximus the Confessor,” Vigiliae Christianae 65 (2011): 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowers, Paul Maximus the Confessor: Jesus Christ and the Transfiguration of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Phil. Crisis of Empire: Doctrine and Dissent at the End of Late Antiquity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. A Radical Jew: Paul and the Politics of Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, David. “Sexual Difference and the Difference It Makes,” in The Reception of Greek Ethics in Late Antiquity and Byzantium. Xenophontos, Sophia and Marmodoro, Anna, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Sebastian and Harvey, Susan, trans. Holy Women of the Syrian Orient. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Cadden, Joan. Meanings of Sex Difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science, and Culture Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cobb, Stephanie. Dying to Be Men: Gender and Language in Early Christian Martyr Texts. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Leopold., ed. Philonis Alexandrini opera quae supersunt 1. Berlin: Reimer, 1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Sophia. Aristotle on Women: Physiology, Psychology, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constas, Nicholas, trans. On Difficulties in Sacred Scripture: The Responses to Thalassios. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Constas, Nicholas ed. and trans. On Difficulties in the Church Fathers: The Ambigua, vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Conway, Colleen. Behold the Man: Jesus and Greco-Roman Masculinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Adam. Holy Flesh, Wholly Deified: The Body in St Maximus the Confessor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costache, Doru. “Living above Gender: Insights from Saint Maximus the Confessor,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 21.2 (2013): 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cvetković, Vladimir. “Logoi, Porphyrian Tree, and Maximus the Confessor’s Rethinking of Aristotelian Logic,” in Aristotle in Byzantium, Knežević, Mikonja, ed. Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press, 2020, 191–215.Google Scholar
Cvetković, Vladimir “Sex, Gender, and Christian Identity in the Patristic Era,” Philosophy and Society 32.2 (2021): 162–176.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen. “Crossed Texts, Crossed Sex: Intertextuality in Early Christian Legends of Holy Women Disguised as Men,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 10.1 (2002): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Dissemination. Johnson, Barbara, ed. and trans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1981, 61–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewhurst, Brown E. “The Absence of Sexual Difference in the Theology of Maximus the Confessor,” Philosophy and Society 32.2 (2021): 204–225.Google Scholar
Dunning, Benjamin. Specters of Paul: Sexual Difference in Early Christian Thought. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erismann, Christophe. “A Logician for East and West: Maximus the Confessor on Universals,” in A Saint for East and West. Haynes, Daniel, ed. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2019, 50–68.Google Scholar
Fatum, Lone. “Image of God and Glory of Man: Women in the Pauline Congregations,” in The Image of God: Gender Models in Judaeo-Christian Tradition. Børresen, Kari, ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1995, 56–137.Google Scholar
Garrigues, Juan-Miguel. Maxime le Confesseur: La charité, avenir divin de l’homme. Paris: Éditions Beauchesne, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Barbara. “‘And I Became a Man’: Gender Fluidity and Closure in Perpetua’s Passion Narrative,” in Roman Literature, Gender, and Reception. Lateiner, Donald, Gold, Barbara K., and Perkins, Judith, eds. New York: Routledge, 2013, 153–165.Google Scholar
Green, Monica. “Bodily Essences,” in A Cultural History of the Human Body in the Middle Ages. Kalof, Linda, ed. New York: Berg, 2010, 149–171, 264–268.Google Scholar
Holmes, Brooke. Gender: Antiquity, and Its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ilberg, Johannes, ed. Sorani Gynaeciorum libri iv, de signis fracturarum, de fasciis, vita Hippocratis secundum Soranum. Leipzig: Teubner, 1927.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, Anthony. The New Roman Empire: A History of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khitruk, Ekaterina Borisovna. “Концептуализация отношения пола к устроению человека в патристической традиции II–VII вв.,” Vyestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvenogo Universityeta 365 (2012): 45–50.Google Scholar
King, Helen. The One-Sex Body on Trial: The Classical and Early Modern Evidence. New York: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochańczyk-Bonińska, Karolina. “Maximus’ Concept of the Sexes: The Reason and Purposes of the Distinction Between Man and Woman,” Maximus the Confessor as a European Philosopher. Mitralexis, Sotiris, Steiris, Georgios, Pobdielski, Marcin, and Lalla, Sebastian, eds. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2017, 229–237.Google Scholar
Kuefler, Mathew. The Manly Eunuch: Masculinity, Gender Ambiguity, and Christian Ideology in Late Antiquity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Lake, Kirsopp and Oulton, John, eds. and trans. The Ecclesiastical History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Larchet, Jean-Claude. La divinisation de l’homme selon saint Maxime le Confesseur. Paris: Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar
Larchet, Jean-Claude “La conception maximienne des énergies divines et des logoi et la théorie platonicienne des Idées,” Philotheos: International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 4 (2004): 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsett, Diane. Desiring Conversion: Hermas, Thecla, Aseneth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, Morwenna. Universal Salvation: Eschatology in the Thought of Gregory of Nyssa and Karl Rahner. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Dennis Ronald. There Is No Male and Female: The Fate of a Dominical Saying in Paul and Gnosticism. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Marcos, Natalio Fernández and Sáenz-Badillos, Angel, eds. Theodoreti quaestiones in Octateuchum. Madrid: Poliglota Matritense, 1979.Google Scholar
Martin, Dale. Sex and the Single Savior: Gender and Sexuality in Biblical Interpretation. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Marunová, Magdalena. “Nourishment in Paradise and After Resurrection: Double Creation According to Gregory of Nyssa,” Perichoresis 19.4 (2021): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowenn Tress, Daryl. “The Metaphysical Science of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals and Its Feminist Critics,” in Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, Ward, Julie K., ed. New York: Routledge, 1996, 31–50.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity,” History of Religions 13.3 (1974): 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkov, Kostake. “Maximus and the Healing of the Sexual Division of Creation,” Knowing the Purpose of Creation Through the Resurrection: Proceedings of the Symposium on St. Maximus the Confessor. Vasiljević, Bishop Maxim, ed. Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press, 2013, 427–436.Google Scholar
Mira, Manuel. “El doblete ΛΟΓΟΣ-ΤΡΟΠΟΣ en la antropología de Máximo el Confesor,” Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum 140 (2014): 685–696.Google Scholar
Mitralexis, Sotiris. “Maximus’ ‘Logical’ Ontology: An Introduction and Interpretative Approach to Maximus the Confessor’s Notion of the λόγοι,” Sobornost 37.1 (2015): 65–82.Google Scholar
Mitralexis, Sotiris “Rethinking the Problem of Sexual Difference in Ambiguum 41,” Analogia 2 (2017): 139–144.Google Scholar
Mitralexis, Sotiris “An Attempt at Clarifying Maximus the Confessor’s Remarks on (the Fate of) Sexual Difference in Ambiguum 41,” Philosophy and Society 32.2 (2021): 194–203.Google Scholar
Nifosi, Ada. Becoming a Woman and Mother in Greco-Roman Egypt: Women’s Bodies, Society, and Domestic Space. London: Routledge, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odorico, P. “La cultura della ΣΥΛΛΟΓΗ,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 83.1 (1990): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivieri, Alexander., ed. Aëtii Amideni libri medicinales i–iv. Leipzig: Teubner, 1935.Google Scholar
Olivieri, Alexander., ed. Aëtii Amideni libri medicinales v–viii. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1950.Google Scholar
Ohme, Heinz. Kirche in der Krise: Zum Streit um die Christologie im 7. Jahrhundert. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, Cameron. “Transfiguring Sexual Difference in Maximus the Confessor,” PhD Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 2008.Google Scholar
Peck, Arthur., trans. and ed. Generation of Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Penn, Michael. Envisioning Islam: Syriac Christians and the Early Muslim World. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purpura, Ashley. God, Hierarchy, Power: Orthodox Theologies of Authority from Byzantium. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ringrose, Kathryn. The Perfect Servant: Eunuchs and the Social Construction of Gender in Byzantium. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ringrose, Kathryn “The Byzantine Body,” in The Oxford Handbook of Women and Gender in Medieval Europe. Bennett, Judith and Karras, Ruth, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 362–378.Google Scholar
Rackham, Harris., ed. and trans. Aristotle: Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Rosser, Sue. Women, Science, and Myth: Gender and Beliefs from Antiquity to the Present. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salés, Luis Josué. “‘Can These Bones Live?’: Gregory of Nyssa’s Appropriation of Aristotelian Psychology in On the Soul and the Resurrection,” Sacris Erudiri 56 (2017): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salés, Luis Josué “Queerly Christified Bodies: Women Martyrs, Christification, and the Compulsory Masculinisation Thesis,” Journal of Early Christian History 10.3 (2020): 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salés, Luis Josué “The Other Life of Maximos the Confessor: A Reevaluation of the Syriac and Greek Lives and the Case for His Alexandrian Origin,” Journal of Late Antiquity 13.2 (2020): 407–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salés, Luis Josué “Androprimacy: A New Analytical Concept for the Study of Gender and Religion with Case Studies from the Ethiopic Didəsqəlya and the Greek Apostolic Constitutions,” in Gender and Religion 12 (2022): 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salés, Luis Josué “Maximos’ Correspondence with Egyptian Women: Introduction, Critical Commentary, and Translation of Letters 11 and 18,” Subsidia Maximiana 3. Cvetković, Vladimir and Léonas, Alexis, eds. Turnhout: Brepols (in press).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Stephen. The Death of a Prophet: The End of Muhammad’s Life and the Beginnings of Islam. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonea, Cristian-Sebastian. “Man’s Mission as Mediator for the Entire World according to Saint Maximus’ Confessor’s Theology,” International Journal of Orthodox Theology 3.3 (2012): 181–185.Google Scholar
Storti, Gemma. “Metrodora’s Work on the Diseases of Women and Their Cures,” Estudios bizantinos 6 (2018): 89–110.Google Scholar
Szczerba, Wojciech. “Podwójne stworzenie a soteriologia Grzegorza z Nyssy,” Poznańskie Studia Teologiczne 22 (2008): 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Alice-Mary, ed. Holy Women of Byzantium, Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1996.Google Scholar
Thunberg, Lars. Microcosm and Mediator: The Theological Anthropology of Maximus the Confessor, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Open Court, 1995.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein. The Christocentric Cosmology of St Maximus the Confessor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tredennick, Hugh and Armstrong, Cyril, eds. and trans. Aristotle: Metaphysics, Books 10-14. Oeconomica. Magna Moralia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Vilimonović, Larisa. “Gender, Diseases, and Sexuality in the Writings of Soranus, Aetius of Amida and Paul of Aegina: Contributions to the Anthropology of Disease in Byzantium,” Etnoantropološki Problemi 17.4 (2022): 1203–1224.Google Scholar
Walters, Jonathan. “Invading the Roman Body: Manliness and Impenetrability in Roman Thought,” Roman Sexualities. Hallett, Judith P. and Skinner, Marilyn, eds. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998, 29–43.Google Scholar
Wilberding, James. Forms, Souls, and Embryos: Neoplatonists on Human Reproduction. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes. Human Nature in Gregory of Nyssa: Philosophical Background and Theological Significance. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar