Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T22:02:06.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Philosophy and Logic

The Logic of Grounding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2024

Fabrice Correia
Fabrice Correia
Affiliation:
University of Geneva

Summary

The concept of grounding – of a fact obtaining in virtue of other facts – has been a topic of intensive philosophical and logical investigation over roughly the past two decades. Many philosophers take grounding to deserve a central place in metaphysical theorizing, in great part because it is thought to do a better job than other concepts – e.g., reduction and supervenience – at capturing certain phenomena. Studies on the logic of grounding have largely been conducted with this philosophical background in mind. In this Element, I try to give a faithful picture of the contemporary development of the logic of grounding in a way that is both reasonably comprehensive and reasonably systematic.
Get access

Keywords

logic of groundingmetaphysical groundingmetaphysical explanationmetaphysical equivalencepuzzles of grounding
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Philosophy and Logic
Online ISBN: 9781009180504
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 16 January 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D. 1962. Tautological Entailments, Philosophical Studies, 13, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D. 1963. First-Degree Entailments, Math. Annalen, 149, 302–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, R. B. 1977. Three Systems of First Degree Entailment, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 42, 147.Google Scholar
Angell, R. B 1989. Deducibility, Entailment and Analytic Containment, in Norman, J. and Sylvan, R. (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 119–43.Google Scholar
Batchelor, R. 2010. Grounds and Consequences, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 80, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. 2011. By Our Bootstraps, Philosophical Perspectives, 25(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K 2017. Making Things up, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzano, B. 1837. Wissenschaftslehre, Sulzbach: Seidel.Google Scholar
Brenner, A., Maurin, A.-S., Skiles, A., Stenwall, R. and Thompson, N. 2021. Metaphysical Explanation, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=metaphysical-explanation.Google Scholar
Correia, F. 2005. Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions, Munich: Philosophia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, F 2010. Grounding and Truth-Functions, Logique et Analyse, 53(211), 251–79.Google Scholar
Correia, F 2011. From Grounding to Truth-Making: Some Thoughts, in Reboul, A. (ed.), Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan, Genève. https://.unige.ch/lettres/philo/mulligan/festschrift/. Reprinted in Reboul, A. (ed.), Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan, Vol. I, 2014, Cham: Springer, 85–98.Google Scholar
Correia, F 2014. Logical Grounds, Review of Symbolic Logic, 7(1), 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, F 2015. Logical Grounding and First-Degree Entailments, in Lapointe, S. (ed.), Themes from Ontology, Mind, and Logic: Present and Past - Essays in Honour of Peter Simons, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Vol, Leiden: Brill Rodopi, 3–15.Google Scholar
Correia, F 2016. On the Logic of Factual Equivalence, Review of Symbolic Logic, 9(1), 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, F 2017. An Impure Logic of Representational Grounding, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 46(5), 507–38.Google Scholar
Correia, F 2020. Granularity, in Raven, M. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding, New York: Routledge, 228–43.Google Scholar
Correia, F 2021a. Fundamentality from Grounding Trees, Synthese, 199, 5965–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Correia, F 2021b. The Logic of Relative Fundamentality, Synthese, 198, 1279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, F 2023. A New Semantic Framework for the Logic of Worldly Grounding (and beyond), in Faroldi, F. and Putte, F. Van De (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-Classical Logic, Outstanding Contributions to Logic, Vol 26, Cham: Springer, 573–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, F. and Skiles, A. 2019. Grounding, Essence, and Identity, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 98(3), 642–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, S. 2014. On the Plurality of Grounds, Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(20), 1–28.Google Scholar
deRosset, L. 2013a. What is Weak Ground?, Essays in Philosophy, 14(1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deRosset, L 2013b. Grounding Explanations, Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(7), 1–26.Google Scholar
deRosset, L 2014. On Weak Ground, Review of Symbolic Logic, 7(4), 713–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deRosset, L 2015. Better Semantics for the Pure Logic of Ground, Analytic Philosophy, 56(3), 229–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deRosset, L. and Fine, K. 2023. A Semantics for the Impure Logic of Ground, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 52, 415–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. 2017. The (Metaphysical) Foundations of Arithmetic?, Noûs, 51(4), 775–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. 2001. The Question of Realism, Philosophers’ Imprint, l(l), l–30.Google Scholar
Fine, K 2010. Some Puzzles of Ground, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 51(1), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K 2012a. Guide to Ground, in Correia, F. and Schneider, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K 2012b. The Pure Logic of Ground, Review of Symbolic Logic, 25(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K 2016. Angellic Content, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45, 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K 2017a. Truthmaker Semantics, in Hale, B., Wright, C. and Miller, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 556–77.Google Scholar
Fine, K 2017b. A Theory of Truthmaker Content I: Conjunction, Disjunction and Negation, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 46(6), 625–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K 2017c. A Theory of Truthmaker Content II: Subject-Matter, Common Content, Remainder and Ground, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 46(6), 675–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K 2023. The Algebraic and Structural Approaches to Truthmaker Semantics: Response to Fabrice Correia, in Faroldi, F. and Putte, F. Van De (eds.), Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-Classical Logic, Outstanding Contributions to Logic, Vol 26, Cham: Springer, 2023, 601–13.Google Scholar
Fritz, P. 2020. On Higher-Order Logical Grounds, Analysis, 80(4), 656–66.Google Scholar
Fritz, P 2022. Ground and Grain, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 105(2), 299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbach, V. 2011. Axiomatic Theories of Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jech, T. 2002. Set Theory, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Korbmacher, J. 2018a. Axiomatic Theories of Partial Ground I: The Base Theory, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(2), 161–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korbmacher, J 2018b. Axiomatic Theories of Partial Ground II: Partial Ground and Typed Truth, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(2), 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, S. 2013. A Simpler Puzzle of Ground, Thought, 2(2), 85–9.Google Scholar
Krämer, S 2018. Towards a Theory of Ground-Theoretic Content, Synthese, 195, 785–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, S 2020. Puzzles, in Raven, M. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding, New York: Routledge, 271–82.Google Scholar
Krämer, S 2021. Ground-Theoretic Equivalence, Synthese, 198(2),1643–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, S. and Roski, S. 2015. A Note on the Logic of Worldly Ground, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 4(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1975. Outline of a Theory of Truth, Journal of Philosophy, 72, 690–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuenberger, S. 2014. Grounding and Necessity, Inquiry, 57(2), 151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litland, J. 2015. Grounding, Explanation, and the Limit of Internality, Philosophical Review, 124(4), 481–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litland, J 2016. Pure Logic of Many-Many Ground, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(5), 531–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litland, J 2017. Grounding Ground, Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 10, 279–316.Google Scholar
Litland, J 2018a. Bicollective Ground: Towards a (Hyper)graphic Account, in Bliss, R. and Priest, G. (eds.), Reality and Its Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 140–64.Google Scholar
Litland, J 2018b. Pure Logic of Iterated Full Ground, Review of Symbolic Logic, 11(3), 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litland, J 2021. A Note on the Wilhelmine Inconsistency, Analysis, 81(4), 639–47.Google Scholar
Lovett, A. 2020a. The Logic of Ground, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49, 13–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, A 2020b. The Puzzles of Ground, Philosophical Studies, 177, 2541–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggiolesi, F. 2016. On Defining the Notion of Complete and Immediate Formal Grounding, Synthese, 193(1), 3147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggiolesi, F 2018. On Constructing a Logic for the Notion of Complete and Immediate Formal Grounding, Synthese, 195(2), 1231–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggiolesi, F 2023. Grounding and Propositional Identity: A Solution to Wilhelm’s Inconsistencies, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 32, 33–38.Google Scholar
Raven, M. 2015. Ground, Philosophy Compass, 10, 322–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, M. (ed.) 2020. Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, G. 2010. Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction, in Hale, B. and Hoffmann, A. (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–36.Google Scholar
Roski, S. and Schnieder, B. (eds.) 2022. Bolzano’s Philosophy of Grounding: Translations and Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2009. On What Grounds What, in Manley, D., Chalmers, D. J. and Wasserman, R. (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 347–83.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J 2010. Monism: The Priority of the Whole, Philosophical Review, 119(1), 31–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2012. Grounding, Transitivity, and Contrastivity, in Correia, F. and Schnieder, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 122–38.Google Scholar
Schnieder, B. 2010. A Puzzle about ‘Because’, Logique & Analyse, 53(211), 317–43.Google Scholar
Schnieder, B 2011. A Logic for ‘Because’, Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(3), 445–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumener, E. 2020. Identity, in Raven, M. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding, New York: Routledge, 413–24.Google Scholar
Skiles, A. 2015. Against Grounding Necessitarianism, Erkenntnis, 80(4), 717–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, I. 2021. Grounding and Propositional Identity, Analysis, 81(1), 80–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, J. 2018. Emptying a Paradox of Ground, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47, 631–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Logic of Grounding
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Logic of Grounding
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Logic of Grounding
Available formats
×