Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:54:53.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Contentious Politics

Law, Mobilization, and Social Movements

How Many Masters?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2024

Whitney K. Taylor  and
Sidney Tarrow
Whitney K. Taylor
Affiliation:
San Francisco State University
Sidney Tarrow
Affiliation:
Cornell University

Summary

Legal and social movement scholars have long puzzled over the role of movements in moving, being moved by, and changing the meanings of the law. But for decades, these two strands of scholarship only dovetailed at their edges, in the work of a few far-seeing scholars. The fields began to more productively merge before and after the turn of the century. In this Element, the authors take an interactive approach to this problem and sketch four mechanisms that seem promising in effecting a true fusion: legal mobilization, legal-political opportunity structure, social construction, and movement-countermovement interaction. The Element also illustrates the workings and interactions of these four mechanisms from two examples of the authors' work: the campaign for same-sex marriage in the United States and social constitutionalism in South Africa.
Get access

Keywords

social movementslawlegal mobilizationsame-sex marriagesocial constitutionalism
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Contentious Politics
Online ISBN: 9781009493024
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 28 March 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard. 1995. Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle against Apartheid, 1980–1994. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce 2000. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce 2018. We the People: The Civil Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce 2014. The Civil Rights Revolution. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Adam, Erin. (2017). “Intersectional Coalitions: The Paradoxes of Rights-Based Movement Building in LGBTQ and Immigrant Communities.” Law & Society Review 51(1): 132–67.Google Scholar
African National Congress. 1994. “Strategy and Tactics.” In 50th National Conference. www.anc1912.org.za/50th-national-conference-strategy-and-tactics-of-the-african-national-congress/Google Scholar
Akbar, Amna A., Ashar, Sameer M., and Simonson, Jocelyn. 2021. “Movement Law.” Stanford Law Review 73: 821–84.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine R. 2005. “Bargaining in the Shadow of Social Institutions: Competing Discourses and Social Change in Workplace Mobilization of Civil Rights.” Law and Society Review 39: 11–50.Google Scholar
Albiston, Catherine R., Cummings, Scott L., and Abel, Richard L.. 2020. “Making Public Interest Lawyers in a Time of Crisis: An Evidence-Based Approach.” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 34: 227–87.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Vargas, Jeanette. 2000. “Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: European Community Law and British Gender Equality Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 33(4): 452–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
García, Alviar, Helena, Karl Klare, and Williams, Lucy A., eds. 2016. Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries. 1st ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aminzade, Ronald R., and McAdam, Doug. 2001. “Emotions and Contentious Politics.” In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by Aminzade, Ronald R., Goldstone, Jack, McAdam, Doug, et al., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–50.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann . 2005. Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Andretta, Massimiliano, and della Porta, Dontatella. 2014. “Surveying Protesters: Why and How.” In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by della Porta, Donatella. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrias, Kate, and Sachs, Benjamin. 2020–21. “Constructing Countervailing Power: Law and Organizing in an Era of Political Inequality.” Yale Law Journal 130: 546–777.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. 2019a. “Hiding in Plain Sight: Pseudonymity and Participation in Legal Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies 52(2): 310–41.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. 2019b. “The Mechanisms behind Litigation’s ‘Radiating Effects’: Historical Grievances against Japan.” Law & Society Review 53(1): 6–40.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2011. Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., and Siegel, Reva B.. 2006. “Principles, Practices, and Social Movements.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154: 927–50.Google Scholar
Barkan, Steven E. 1980. “Political Trials and Resource Mobilization: Towards an Understanding of Social Movement Litigation.” Social Forces 58: 944–61.Google Scholar
Barkan, Steven E. 1984. “Legal Control of the Southern Civil Rights Movement.” American Sociological Review 49: 552–65.Google Scholar
Barkan, Steven E. 1985. Protesters on Trial: Criminal Justice in the Southern Civil Rights and Vietnam Antiwar Movements. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel, Kaase, Max, Allerback, Klaus R., et al. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence., Baum 2008. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. 1 ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick A. Jr. 1976. “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation.” Yale Law Journal 85: 470–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A.. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botero, Sandra, Brinks, Daniel M., and Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel (Eds.). 2022. The Limits of Judicialization: From Progress to Backlash in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. 2010. “Mobilizing in the Shadow of the Law: Lesbian and Gay Rights in the Aftermath of Bowers v Hardwick.” Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 31: 175–205.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. 2013. “Lawyering for Social Change: Pro Bono Publico, Cause Lawyering and the Social Movement Society.” Mobilization 18: 179–96.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. and McCammon, Holly J.. 2019. “Social Movements and Litigation.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 2nd ed, edited by Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., Kriesi, Hanspeter, and McCammon, Holly. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 306–21.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A., and Stobaugh, James E.. 2013. “Law and Social Movements.” In Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by Porta, Donatella della, Klandermans, Bert, McAdam, Doug, Snow, David. New York: Blackwell, pp. 683–87.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A., Shdaimah, Corey, and Yarbrough, Michael W. (Eds.). 2023. in preparation. Research Handbook on Law, Movements, and Social Change. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Brewer-Carías, Allan R. 2009. Constitutional Protection of Human Rights in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Amparo Proceedings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., Gauri, Varun, and Shen, Kyle. 2015. “Social Rights Constitutionalism: Negotiating the Tension between the Universal and the Particular.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 11: 289–308.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, and Sharon., Wolchik 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1991. “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic.” American Journal of Sociology 96: 1201–25.Google Scholar
Penelope, Canan, and Pring, George W.. 1988. “Studying Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation: Mixing Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.” Law and Society Review 22: 385–95.Google Scholar
Chen, Alan. 2013. “Rights Lawyer Essentialism and the Next Generation of Rights Critics.” Michigan Law Review 111: 903–29.Google Scholar
Chen, Alan K. and Cummings, Scott L.. 2013. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2018. The Politics of Love in Myanmar: LGBT Mobilization and Human Rights as a Way of Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2019. “Legal Mobilization and Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15: 355–76.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette, Engel, David, and Liu, Sida, eds. 2023. The Asian Law and Society Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, Hugh, and Cora., Hoexter 2017. “‘Lawfare’ in South Africa and Its Effects on the Judiciary.” African Journal of Legal Studies 10(2–3): 105–26.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Gary. 2001. “Social Movements, Law, and Society: The Institutionalization of the Environmental Movement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150: 85–120.Google Scholar
Cole, David. 2012. “Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11.” Wayne State Law Review 57: 1203–67.Google Scholar
Cole, David 2015. Engines of Liberty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa J. 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel (Eds.). 2010. Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 2011. “Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back to Move Forward.” Connecticut Law Review 117: 1253–353.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2016. “The Social Movement Turn in Law.” Law and Social Inquiry 43: 360–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2017a. “Movement Lawyering.” U. of Illinois Law Review 2117: 1646–732.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2017b. “The Puzzle of Social Movements in American Legal Theory.” UCLA Law Review 64: 1552–658.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2018a. Blue and Green: The Drive for Justice in America’s Port. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2018b. “Law and Social Movements: Reimagining the Progressive Canon.” Wisconsin Law Review 3: 441–501.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2024. “Lawyers in Backsliding Democracy.” California Law Review 112: 1–52.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L., and NeJaime, Douglas. 2010. “Lawyering for Marriage Equality.” UCLA Law Review 57: 1235–331.Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald F., Doug McAdam, W. Richard Scott, and Zald, Mayer N., eds. 2005. Social Movements and Organization Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Fazio, Gianluca. 2012. “Legal Opportunity Structure and Social Movement Strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States.” International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 53: 3–22.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Stefano, Jean. 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. 2014a. “Surveying Protesters: Why and How.” In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by Porta., D. Della Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 308–34.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella (Ed.). 2014b. Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella and Diani, Mario. 2006. Social Movements: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell’s.Google Scholar
Dent, Kate. 2023. Lawfare and Judicial Legitimacy: The Judicialisation of Politics in the Case of South Africa. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dickinson, John 1985. “Letters from an American Farmer.” In The Writings of John Dickinson. Political Writings 1764–1774, edited by Ford, Paul Leicester. Philadelphia: Historical Society of Pennsylvania, pp. 312–25.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C., and Chu, Michael S.. 2018. “Lawyers as Activists: From the Airport to the Courtroom.” In The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement, edited by Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–42.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C., and Tarrow, Sidney. 2014. “Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same-Sex Marriage into the Public Arena.” Law and Social Inquiry 39: 449–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugan, Kimberly B. 2004. “Strategy and ‘Spin’: Opposing Movement Frames in an Anti-Gay Voter Initiative.” Sociological Focus 37(3): 213–33.Google Scholar
Dugard, Jackie. 2006. “‘Court of First Instance?’ Towards a Pro-poor Jurisdiction for the South African Constitutional Court.” South African Journal on Human Rights 22: 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugard, Jackie 2015. “Closing the Doors of Justice: An Examination of the Constitutional Court’s Approach to Direct Access, 1995–2013.” South African Journal on Human Rights 31: 112–35.Google Scholar
Dugard, John. 1990. “Toward Racial Justice in South Africa.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, edited by Henken, Louis and Rosenthal, Albert. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 349–80.Google Scholar
Dugard, John. 2015. Human Rights and the South African Legal Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Leachman, Gwendolyn, and McAdam, Doug. 2010. “On Law, Organizations, and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 683–85.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, and Ginsburg, Tom. 2021. “Characteristics of National Constitutions Version 3.0.” In Comparative Constitutions Project. comparativeconstitutionsproject.org.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Engel, Jaruwan S.. 2010. Tort, Custom, and Karma: Globalization and Legal Consciousness in Thailand. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2001. “Channeling: Identity-Based Social Movements and Public Law.” U. Penn. Law Rev. 150: 419–525.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr., and Spedale., Gary R. 2007. Gay Marriage: For Better or for Worse? What We’ve Learned from the Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Case, Evans, Rhonda, and Givens, Terri E.. 2010. “Re-Engineering Legal Opportunity Structures in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48: 221–41.Google Scholar
Patricia, Ewick and Silbey, Susan S.. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Faux, Marian. 1988. Roe Versus Wade: The Untold Story of the Landmark Supreme Court Decision That Made Abortion Legal. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Fetner, Tina. 2008. How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha A. 1992. “Feminist Theory in Law: The Difference It Makes.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 2: 1–23.Google Scholar
Fisher, Dana R. 2019. American Resistance: From the Women’s March to the Blue Wave. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, Catherine L., and Reddy, Diana S.. 2020. “Protection by Law, Repression by Law: Bringing Labor Back into the Study of Law and Social Movements.” Emory Law Journal 70: 62–152.Google Scholar
Fowkes, James. 2016. Building the Constitution: The Practice of Constitutional Interpretation in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9: 95–160.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Janice. 2022. Bootstrap Justice: The Search for Mexico’s Disappeared. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary. 2006. “Mobilizing the Law in China: ‘Informed Disenchantment’ and the Development of Legal Consciousness.” Law and Society Review 4: 783–816.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary 2017. Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers and the State. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary, and Yang, Yujeong. 2017. “Getting Schooled: Legal Mobilization as an Educative Process.” Law and Social Inquiry 42: 163–93.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Meyer, David S.. 1996. “Framing Political Opportunity.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John, and Zald, Mayer N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–90.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A., and Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action.” In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, edited by Aminzade, Ronald. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
González Ocantos, Ezequiel. 2014. “Persuade Them or Oust Them: Crafting Judicial Change and Transitional Justice in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 46: 479–98.Google Scholar
González Ocantos, Ezequiel 2016. Shifting legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, Jasper, James M., and Polletta, Francesca eds. 2001. Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 2009. “Courting the People: Demosprudence and the Law/Politics Divide.” Boston University Law Review 89: 539–61.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani, and Torres, Gerald. 2014. “Changing the Wind: Notes towards a Demosprudence of Law and Social Movements.” Yale Law Journal 123: 2740–804.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1978. Social Movements and the Legal System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haney-López, Ian. 1997. White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Mark L. 2004. “Civil Society in Post-Revolutionary America.” In Empire and Nation: The American Revolution in the Atlantic World, edited by Gould, Eliga H. and Onuf, Peter S.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 1999. “Rewriting the Rules of the Game in Russia: The Neglected Issue of Demand for Law.” East European Constitutional Review 8(4): 89–95.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris. 2002. “New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity.” Journal of European Public Policy 9: 238–55.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris 2013. “The Courts and Social Movements: Two Literatures and Two Methodologies.” Mobilizing Ideas: 1–3. https://mobilizingideas.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/the-courts-and-social-movements-two-literatures-and-two-methodologies/.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris 2016. “Environmental SLAPPS in the UK: Threat or Opportunity?” Environmental Politics 25: 248–67.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda I. 2015. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Nan D. 2017. “Varieties of Constitutional Experience: Democracy and the Marriage Equality Campaign”. UCLA Law Review 64: 1662–726.Google Scholar
Hutter, Sven. 2014. “Protest Event Analysis and Its Offspring.” In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by della Porta, Donatella. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, and Perrow, Charles. 1977. “Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946–1972).” American Sociological Review 42: 249–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ben, and Strother, Logan. 2021. “The Supreme Court’s (Surprising?) Indifference to Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 74: 18–34.Google Scholar
Kahraman, Filiz. 2018. “A New Era for Labor Activism? Strategic Mobilization of Human Rights against Blacklisting.” Law and Social Inquiry 43: 1279–307.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1998. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Transnational Activist Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2009. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law and Society Review 43: 151–85.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keniston, Kenneth. 1960. Young Radicals: Notes on Committed Youth. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 2006. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Washington, DC: Beard Books.Google Scholar
Kim, Claudia Junghyun, and Arrington, Celeste L.. 2023. “Knowledge Production through Legal Mobilization: Environmental Activism against the U.S. Military Bases in East Asia.” Law & Society Review 57(2): 162–88.Google Scholar
Kim, Jieun, Stern, Rachel E., Liebman, Benjamin L., and Xiaohan, Wu. 2021. “Closing Open Government: Grassroots Policy Conversion of China’s Open government Information Regulation and its Aftermath.” Comparative Political Studies 55: 318–32.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert, and Mayer, Nonna. 2006. Extreme Right Activists in Europe: Through the Magnifying Glass. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl. 1978. “Law-Making as Praxis.” Telos 40: 123–35.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl 1978–9. “Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937–1941.” Minnesota Law Review 62: 265–339.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2013. From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2020. “The Degradation of American Democracy – and the Court.” Harvard Law Review 134: 4–62.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa’s Political Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz 2016. “Challenging Constitutionalism in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Constitutional Studies 2: 41–58.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2001. “Forward: We the Court.” Harvard Law Review 115: 4–169.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanspeter, Kriesi, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Marco, Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Roux, Le, Michelle, and Davis, Dennis. 2019. Lawfare: Judging Politics in South Africa. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball.Google Scholar
Emilio, Lehoucq, and Taylor, Whitney K.. 2019. “Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: How Should We Understand the Deployment of Legal Strategies.” Law and Social Inquiry 45: 166–93. www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-social-inquiry/article/abs/conceptualizing-legal-mobilization-how-should-we-understand-the-deployment-of-legal-strategies/A73F0A497C59751DE7E9606F1372F827.Google Scholar
Lemaitre, Julieta and Sieder, Rachel. 2017. “The Moderating Influence of International Courts on Social Movements.” Health and Human Rights 19: 149–60.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 2014. “Popular Sovereignty and the United States Constitution: Tensions in the Ackermanian Program.” Yale Law Journal 123: 2644–74.Google Scholar
Nancy, Levit and Verchick, Robert M.. 2016. Feminist Legal Theory: A Primer. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Sida, Liu and Halliday, Terence C.. 2016. Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. 2007. “The Paradox of Extralegal Activism: Critical Legal Consciousness and Transformative Politics.” Harvard Law Review 120: 937–88.Google Scholar
Lodge, Tom. 1983. Black Politics in South Africa Since 1945. New York: Addison Wesley Longmans.Google Scholar
Lovell, George. 2012. This Is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 24: 507–48.Google Scholar
Mandela, Nelson. 1995. Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela. Boston: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Margulies, Joseph. 2013. What Changed When Everything Changed: 9/11 and the Making of National Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Margulies, Joseph and Metcalf, M.. 2011. “Terrorizing Academia.” Journal of Legal Education 60: 433–71.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary and Doug, McAdam. 1996. “Social Movements and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union.” In Governance in the European Union, edited by Marks, Gary, Scharpf, Fritz W., Schmitter, Philippe C., Wolfgang, Streeck. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2003. “Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment.” Law and Social Inquiry 28: 659–89.Google Scholar
Mayo-Adam, Erin. 2023 “Marriage Equality’s Wasteland: On the Struggle for Queer Reproductive Justice.” Paper Presented at the 2023 Law & Society Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982[1999]. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D., and Tarrow, S.. 2019. “Strands of Classical Sociological Theory in the Study of Social Movements.” In The Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory, edited by Abrutyn, Seth and Lizardo, Omar. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 467–85.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J. 2012. The U.S. Women’s Jury Movements and Strategic Adaptation: A More Just Verdict. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1992. “The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? by Gerald N. Rosenberg.” Law and Social Inquiry 17: 715–43.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1996. “Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficult of Being So Positive).” Law and Social Inquiry 21: 457–82.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (Ed.). 2006. Law and Social Movements. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, and Kahraman, Filiz. 2021. “On the Interdependence of Liberal and Illiberal/Authoritarian Legal Forms in Racial Capitalist Regimes … The Case of the United States.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 17(1): 483–503.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W., and Lovell, George I.. 2020. Union By Law: Filipino American Labor Activists, Rights Radicalism, and Racial Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W., and Hortom, William. 2004. Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
John, McCarthy, and Zald, Mayer N.. 1973. The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
John, McCarthy, and Zald, Mayer N. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212–41.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, McPhail, Clark, and Smith, Jackie. 1996. “Images of Protest: Estimating Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations.” American Sociological Review 61: 478–99.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. 2008. The Legacies of Law: Long-run Consequences of Legal Development in South Africa, 1652–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 2006a. “Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle.” American Anthropologist 108: 38–51.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 2006b. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Boutcher, Steven A.. 2008. “Signals and Spillover: Brown V. Board of Education and Other Social Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 5: 81–93.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 101: 1628–60.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Suzanne 1998. “Countermovement Dynamics in Federal Systems: A Comparison of Abortion Politics in Canada and the United States.” Research in Political Sociology 8: 209–40.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Suzanne 2022. “Understanding Countermovements.” In Handbook of Anti-Environmentalism, edited by Tindall, David, Stoddard, Mark C. J., and Dunlap Riley, E. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Michel, Verónica. 2018. Prosecutorial Accountability and Victim’s Rights in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, Verónica, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2013. “Human Rights Prosecutions and the Participation Rights of Victims in Latin America.” Law and Society Review 47: 873–907.Google Scholar
Mottl, Tahi. 1980. “The Analysis of Countermovements.” Social Problems 27: 620–35.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2014. “Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 281–99.Google Scholar
Murphy, Hannah, and Kellow, Aynsley. 2013. “Forum Shopping in Global Governance: Understanding States, Business and NGOs in Multiple Arenas.” Global Policy 4(2): 139–49.Google Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas. 2011. “Winning Through Losing.” Iowa Law Review 96: 943–1012.Google Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas 2012. “The Legal Mobilization Dilemma.” Emory Law Journal 61: 664–733.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, and Selznick, Philip. 2001. Law and Society in Transition. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1985. “New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics.” Social Research 52: 817–68.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan M. 1984. Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Paris, Michael. 2009. Framing Political Opportunity: Law and the Politics of School Finance Reform. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Christopher S., and Barreto, Matt A.. 2013. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pavone, Tommaso. 2022. The Ghostwriters: Lawyers and the Politics behind the Judicial Construction of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masling, Perley, Sharon, Saghi Fattahian, and Zimmerman, Jonathan. 2023. “Evolving Laws and Litigation Post-Dobbs: The State of Reproductive Rights as of January 2023.” www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2023/01/evolving-laws-and-litigation-post-dobbs-the-state-of-reproductive-rights-as-of-january-2023.Google Scholar
Phillips, Laura. 2017. “History of South Africa’s Bantustans.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History (July). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.80.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard. 1992. “The Normalization of Collective Protest.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Morris, Aldon and Mueller, Carol McClurg. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 301–25.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2000. “The Structural Context of Novel Rights Claims: Southern Civil Rights Organizing, 1961-1966.” Law and Society Review 34: 367–406.Google Scholar
Post, Robert. 2006. “Originalism as a Political Practice: The Right’s Living Constitution.” Fordham Law Review 75: 545–74.Google Scholar
Robert, Post, and Siegel, Reva B.. 2007. “Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash.” Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review 42: 373–434.Google Scholar
Prabhat, Devyani. 2016. Unleashing the Force of Law: Legal Mobilization, National Security, and Basic Freedoms. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pring, George W. 1989. “SLAPPS: Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation.” Pace Environmental Law Review 7: 3–21.Google Scholar
Randeria, Shalini. 2007. “Legal Pluralism, Social Movements and the Post-Colonial State in India: Fractured Sovereignty and Differential Citizenship Rights.” In Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies, edited by Bonaventura de Sousa Santos. London: Verso, pp. 41–75.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1996. “Positivism, Interpretivism, and the Study of Law.” Law and Social Inquiry 2(1): 435–55.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2022. “Abortion After Dobbs.” Law and Courts Newsletter 32: 18–41.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2023. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roux, Theunis. 2020. “The Constitutional Court’s 2018 Term: Lawfare or Window on the Struggle for Democratic Social Transformation.” Constitutional Court Review 10: 1–42.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter. 1998. “The Structure and Culture of Collective Protest in Germany since 1950.” In The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century, edited by Meyer, David and Tarrow, Sidney. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 29–57.Google Scholar
Ruibal, Alba. 2023. “Legal Mobilization: Social Movements and the Judicial System across Latin America.” In Oxford Handbook of Latin American Social Movements, edited by Rossi, Federico. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 746–60.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (Ed.). 2021. The Legacy of Stuart Scheingold. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Austin, Sarat and Scheingold, Stuart A. (Eds.). 1997. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Sarat and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in the Global Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Sarat and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2005. The Worlds Cause Lawyers Make. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Sarat and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2006. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Sarat and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2008. The Cultural Lives of Cause Lawyers. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A., and Austin, Sarat. 2004. Something to Believe in: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Daniel. 2015. When Movements Anchor Parties: Electoral Alignments in American History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schonfeld, Zach. 2023. “Prospects Rise for NY Charges against Trump in Stormy Daniels Case.” Yahoo News. https://news.yahoo.com/prospects-rise-ny-charges-against-110000454.html2023.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday forms of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sidel, Mark. 2004. More Secure, Less Free? Antiterrorism Policy and Civil Liberties after September 11. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan (Eds.). 2005. The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2001. “Text in Context: Gender and the Constitution from a Social Movement Perspective.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150: 297–351.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2002. “She the People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism and the Family.” Harvard Law Review 113: 1–94.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2008. “Dead or Alive: Originalism as Popular Constitutionalism in Heller.” Harvard Law Review 122: 191–245.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2023. “Memory Games: Dobbs’s Originalism as Anti-Democratic Living Constitutionalism—and Some Pathways for Resistance.” Texas Law Review 101: 1–78.Google Scholar
Kathryn., Sikkink 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. 1 ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2016. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena. 1996. Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Erica. 2016. Meaningful Resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Steven. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, David. 2021. “How Did Republicans Turn Critical Race Theory into a Winning Electoral Issue?” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/03/republicans-critical-race-theory-winning-electoral-issue. 2021.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Steven K. Worden Jr., and Benford, Robert D.. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51: 464–81.Google Scholar
Soley, Ximena. 2019. “The Crucial Role of Human Rights NGOs in the Inter-American System.” American Journal of International Law 113: 355–9.Google Scholar
Spade, Dean, and Willse, Craig. 2015. Marriage Will Never Set Us Free. Melbourne: Subversion Press.Google Scholar
Sparks, Allister. 1996. Tomorrow is Another Country: The Inside Story of South Africa’s Road to Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1991. The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne 1995. “The Survival of the Pro-Choice Movement.” Journal of Policy History 7: 160–76.Google Scholar
Staszak, Sarah L. 2015. No Day in Court: Access to Justice and the Politics of Judicial Retrenchment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Rachel E. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Amy. 2012. Gay Rights at the Ballot Box. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Anne-Marie E. 2003. Pathways to Prohibition: Radicals, Moderates, and Social Movement Outcomes. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tam, Waikeung. 2013. Legal Mobilization under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965-1974. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney 1996. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by Doug, McAdam, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–92.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney 2012. Strangers at the Gates: Movements and States in Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney 2021. Movements and Parties: Critical Connections in American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney 2022 [1994, 2011]. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Verta, Van Dyke, Nella, Kimport, Katrina, and Ann Andersen, Ellen. 2009. “Culture and Mobilization: Tactical Repertoires, Same-Sex Weddings, and the Impact on Gay Activism.” American Sociological Review 74: 865–86.Google Scholar
Taylor, Whitney K. 2018. “Ambivalent Legal Mobilization: Perceptions of Justice and the Use of the Tutela in Colombia.” Law and Society Review 52: 337–67.Google Scholar
Taylor, Whitney K. 2020. “On the Social Construction of Legal Grievances: Evidence from Colombia and South Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 53: 1326–56.Google Scholar
Taylor, Whitney K. 2023a. “Judicial Agency and the Adjudication of Social Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 45: 283–309.Google Scholar
Taylor, Whitney K. 2023b. The Social Constitution: Embedding Social Rights in Colombia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2008. Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tezcür, Güneş Murat. 2009. “Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case.” Law & Society Review 43(2): 305–36.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1993. “Making Democracy Safe for the World: Social Movements and Global Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 18(3): 273–305.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1979. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trochev, Alexei. 2008. Judging Russia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, David 2022. “Beyond Litigation.” Law and Society Review 56: 286–308.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1991. “Critical Legal Studies: A Political History.” Yale Law Journal 100: 1515–44.Google Scholar
Unger, Robert. 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cott, Van, Lee, Donna. 2000. The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Robert 2005. From Movements to Parties in Latin America: The Evolution of Ethnic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2010. Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2011. “Legal Mobilization.” In Oxford Bibliographies. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756223/obo-9780199756223-0031.xml.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2012. “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK.” Law and Society Review 46: 523–56.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2018. “Shaping the Structure of Legal Opportunities: Environmental NGOs Bringing International Environmental Procedural Rights Back Home.” Law and Policy 40: 110–27.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2022. “Environmental Legal Mobilization.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 18: 101–17.Google Scholar
Vüllers, Johannes, and Hellmeier, Sebastian. 2022. “Does Counter-Mobilization Contain Right-Wing Populist Movements? Evidence from Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 61: 21–45.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 2018. “Women in the Legal Academy: A Brief History of Feminist Legal Theory.” Fordham Law Review 87: 977–1003.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce. 2009. “Institutional Reform and Rights Revolution in Latin America: The Cases of Costa Rica and Colombia.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1: 59–85.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce, and Gianella-Malca, Camilla. 2019. “Overcoming the Limits of Legal Opportunity Structures: LGBT Rights’ Divergent Paths in Costa Rica and Colombia.” Latin American Politics and Society 61: 138–63.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce, and Carlos Rodriguez Cordero, Juan. 2006. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 39(3): 325–51.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N., and McCarthy, John (Eds.). 1987. Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. “The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review 77: 690–703.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Law, Mobilization, and Social Movements
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Law, Mobilization, and Social Movements
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Law, Mobilization, and Social Movements
Available formats
×