Element contents
Series: Elements in Islam and Science
Islam, Causality, and Science
Perspectives on Reconciliation of Islamic Tradition and Modern Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2024
Summary
This Element intends to contribute to the debate between Islam and science. It focuses on one of the most challenging issues in the modern discussion on the reconciliation of religious and scientific claims about the world, which is to think about divine causality without undermining the rigor and efficacy of the scientific method. First, the Element examines major Islamic accounts of causality. Then, it provides a brief overview of contemporary debates on the issue and identifies both scientific and theological challenges. It argues that any proposed Islamic account of causality for the task of reconciliation should be able to preserve scientific rigor without imposing a priori limits on scientific research, account for miracles without turning them into science-stoppers or metaphors, secure divine and creaturely freedom, and establish a strong sense of divine presence in the world. Following sections discuss strengths and weaknesses of each account in addressing these challenges.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Islam and ScienceOnline ISBN: 9781009489287Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 19 December 2024
References
Alousi, Hasam M. 1968. The Problem of Creation in Islamic Thought. Cambridge: The National Printing.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, . 1963/1382. Maqālāt al-Islamiyyīn wa Ikhtilāf al-Muṣallīn, ed. Ritter, Helmut. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, 1953. “A Vindication of the Science of Kalam (Risāla fī Istiḥsān al-Khawḍ fī ʿIlm al-Kalām),” in The Theology of Ashʿari, ed. McCarthy, Richard J. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 119–134.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, 1955. al-Lumaʿ, ed. Ghuraba, Hammuda. Cairo: Mattbaʻat Misr Sharikah Musahimah Misriyah.Google Scholar
Ashʿarī, 1967. The Elucidation from Islam’s Foundation (Kitāb al-Ibāna), trans. Walter C. Klein. American Oriental Series, vol. 19. New York: Kraus Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Baghdādī, 1948. al-Farq bayn al-Firaq, ed. al-Kawthari., Zahid Cairo: Maktab Nashr al-Thaqafah al-Islamiyya.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, . 1987/1407. Kitāb al-Tamhīd, ed. Haydar, Imaduddin Ahmad. Beirut: Muassasa al-Kutub al-Thakafiyya.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, 1958. Kitāb al-Bayān, ed. Richard McCarthy, . Beirut: al-Maktabat al-Sharqiyya.Google Scholar
Bigliardi, Stefano. 2014. Islam and the Quest for Modern Science: Conversations with Adnan Oktar, Mehdi Golshani, Mohammed Basil Altaie, Zaghloul El-Naggar, Bruno Guiderdoni and Nidhal Guessoum. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.Google Scholar
Brunschvig, Robert. 1974. “Muʿtazilisme et optimum,” Studia Islamica, 39, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Philip. 1997. God and Contemporary Science. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip 2009. In Quest of Freedom: The Emergence of Spirit in the Natural World. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprech.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip 2004. Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Philip 2004. “Natural Law and Divine Action: The Search for an Expanded Theory of Causation,” Zygon, 39, 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Philip 2004. “Panentheism Today: A Constructive Systematic Evaluation,” in In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, eds. Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans, 249–264.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip 2002. “The Impossible Possibility: Divine Causes in the World of Nature,” in God Life and the Cosmos, eds. Peters, Ted, Iqbal, Muzaffar, Haq, Syed Nomanul. Burlington: Ashgate, 239–280.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip 1999. “The Pantheistic Turn in Christian Theology,” Dialog, 38, 289–293.Google Scholar
Demir, Osman. 2015. Kelamda Nedensellik: Ilk Dönem Kelamcılarında Tabiat ve İnsan. İstanbul: TC Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
Dhanani, Alnoor. 1994. The Physical Theory of Kalām: Atoms, Space, and Void in Basrian Muʿtazilī Cosmology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Draper, Paul. 2005. “God, Science, and Naturalism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, ed. Wainwright, William J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 272–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Richard M. 1967. “Al-Maʿnā: Some Reflections on the Technical Meanings of the Term in the Kalam and Its Use in the Physics of Muʿammar,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 87.3, 248–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Richard M. 1984. “Bodies and Atoms: The Ashʿarite Analysis,” in Islamic Theology and Philosophy: Studies in Honor of George F. Hourani, ed. Marmura, Michael E.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 39–63.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. 1977. “Reason and Revealed Law: A Sample of Parallels and Divergences in Kalam and Falsafa,” in Recherches d’Islamologie. Recuil d’articles offert a Georges C. Anawati et Louis Gardet par leurs collegues et amis, ed. Gardet, Anawati. Louvain: Peeters, 123–138 .Google Scholar
Frank, Richard M. 1966. The Metaphysics of Created Being According to Abū al-Hudhayl Al-‘Allāf. Istanbul: Netherlands Historische-Archeologisch Instituut.Google Scholar
Arnold., Geulincx 1893. Arnoldi Geulincx antverpiensis Opera philosophica, ed. Nicolaas Land, Jan Pieter, vol. 2. Hague: Martinum Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, . 1997. The Incoherence of the Philosophers (Tahāfut al-Falāsifa), a Parallel English-Arabic Text, ed. and trans. Michael Elias Marmura. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel 1980. Th´eories de lʿacte humain en th´eologie musulmane. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel 2004. “Muʿtazila,” in Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd ed., eds. Peri Bearman, Thierry Bianquis, Edmund Bosworth, Edmund J. van Donzel, and Wolfhart P. Heinrichs. Brill. Consulted online on September 15, 2023. www.muslimphilosophy.com/ei2/mu-tazila.htm.Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. 2009. Al-Ghazālī’s Philosophical Theology: An Introduction to the Study of His Life and Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guessoum, Nidhal. 2023. http://muslim-science.com/islam-science-methodological-naturalism-divine-action-and-miracles/ visited on September 18.Google Scholar
Guessoum, Nidhal 2011. Islam’s Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. New York: I. B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günaltay, M. Şemsettin. 2008. Kelam Atomculuğu ve Kaynağı Sorunu, edited and noted by Bayın, Irfan. Ankara: Fecr.Google Scholar
Abū., Hanīfa 1992. “al-Fiqh al-Absat,” in İmamı Azamın Beş Eseri, trans. Mustafa Öz. Istanbul: Marmara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Vakfi, 33–52.Google Scholar
al-Murtazā., Ibn 1985. al-Munya wa-l-Amal, ed. Muhammad Ali., Isamuddīn ibn Alexandria: Dar al-Maʿrifa al-Jamiyya, 109–112.Google Scholar
Ibn, ʿArabī. 2017. Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam, commentary by Ahmad Avni Konuk. Istanbul: Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı.Google Scholar
Ibn, ʿArabī. 1980. The Bezels of Wisdom, translation and introduction by Ralph W. J. Austin. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Ḥazm, Ibn. 1982/1402. al-Faṣl fī-l-Milal wa-l-Ahwāʾ wa-l-Niḥal, eds. Nasr, Ibrahim and Umayra, Abdurrahman. Riyad-Jidda: Maktabatu Ukaz.Google Scholar
Maymūn, Ibn. 2002. (Maimonides), The Guide for the Perplexed (Dalālat al-Ḥāʾirīn), trans. Michael Friedlander, 2nd ed. Ilinois, IL: Varda Books.Google Scholar
Rushd, Ibn. 1954. Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, trans. Simon Van den Bergh. London: Messrs. Luzac.Google Scholar
Sīnā, Ibn. 2005. al-Shifāʾ al-Ilāhiyyāt (The Metaphysics of The Healing: A Parallel English-Arabic Text), ed. and trans. Michael. E. Marmura. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
Jabrī, Mohammad al-. 2011. The Formation of Arab Reason, trans. The Centre for Arab Unity Studies. Hamra: The Centre for Arab Unity Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jāḥiẓ, . 1969. Kitāb al-Ḥayawān, ed. Harun., Abdussalam Muhammad Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turasi al-Arabi.Google Scholar
Jurjānī, . 2012. al-Sayyīd al-Sharīf, Sharḥ al-Mawāqif, ed. al-Dimyati, Mahmud Omar, 8 vols. Beirut: Dar al-Qutub al-Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
Jurjānī, 2015. Sharḥ al-Mawāqif, trans. by Omer Turker, a Parallel Turkish-Arabic text, 3 vols. Istanbul: Turkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Baskanligi.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, . 1969. al-Shāmil fī Uṣūl al-Dīn, eds. al-Nashshar, Ali Sami, Budayr Awn, Faysal, and Muhammad Mukhtar, Suhayr. Alexandria: Munshaʾat al-Maʿarif.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, 1985. Kitāb al-Irshād, ed. Tamimi, Asad. Beirut: Muassasa al-Kutub al-Thakafiyya.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, 2003/1424. al-ʿAqīda al-Niẓāmiyya, ed. Zubaidi, Muhammad. Beirut: Dar Sabil al-Rashad.Google Scholar
Kandemir, Ahmet Mekin. 2020. “Mu’tezile’de Zorunlu Nedensellik ve Mucize: Tabiat Teorileri Çerçevesinde Bir İnceleme,” Kader, 18.1, 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khayyāt, . 1957. Kitāb al-Intiṣār wa-l-Rad ʿalā Ibn al-Rāwandī al-Mulḥid, eds. Nyberg, Henrik Samuel and Nader, Albert. Beirut: al-Matbaa al-Katolikiyya.Google Scholar
Koca, Ozgur. 2020. Islam, Causality, and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, George. 1962. “Ashʿari, the Ashʿarites and Islamic Religious History I,” Studia Islamica, 17, 39, 37–80.Google Scholar
Māturīdī, . 2003. Kitāb al-Tawḥīd, eds. Topaloğlu, Bekir and Aruci, Muhammad. Istanbul: ISAM.Google Scholar
Muhtaroğlu, Nazif. 2010. “An Occasionalist Defense of Free Will,” in Classical Issues in Islamic Philosophy and Theology Today, ed. Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. New York: Springer, 45–62.Google Scholar
Malik, Shoaib Ahmed and Muhtaroglu, Nazif. 2002. “How Much Should or Can Science Impact Theological Formulations: An Ash’ari Perspective on Theology of Nature,” European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 18.2, 5–35.Google Scholar
Ṣadrā, Mullā. 1981. al-Ḥikmat al-Mutaʿāliya fī-l-Asfār al-ʿAqliyyat al-ʿArbaʿa, ed. Al-Muzaffar, Muhammad Rida, 9 vols . Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. 1997. Reconciling Theology and Science: A Radical Reformation Perspective. Kitchener, CA: Pandora Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey 1995. “Divine Action in the Natural Order: Buridan’s Ass and Schrodinger’s Cat,” in Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, eds. Russell, Robert, Murphy, Nancy, and Peacocke, Arthur. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 325–358.Google Scholar
al-Bizri., Nader 2008. “God: Essence and Attributes,” in Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, ed. Winter, Tim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasafī., 1990–1993. Tabṣirat al-Adilla, ed. Salame, Claude. Damascus: Institut Français de Damas, I. 189–200.Google Scholar
Nīsābūrī, . 1979. al-Masāʾil, eds. Sayyid, Ridwan and , Maʿn Ziyada. Beirut : Maʿhad al-Inma al-Arabi.Google Scholar
Nursi, Said. 2004. The Words: From the Risale-i Nur Collection, trans. Şükran Vahide (revised edition). Istanbul: Sözler Neşriyat.Google Scholar
Pazdawī, . 1963. Uṣūl al-Dīn, ed. Lins, Hans Peter. Cairo: Dar Ihya al-Kutub al-Arabiyya.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur. 1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming–Natural, Divine, and Human, 2nd ed. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur 2004. Creation and the World of Science: The Reshaping of Belief, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik and Rudolph, Ulrich. 2000. Occasionalismus: Theorien der Kausalität im arabisch-islamischen und im europäischen Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 28–62.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. 1989. Science and Providence: God’s Interaction with the World. Boston, MA: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John 1999. Science and Theology: An Introduction. Minneapolis, MN: First Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John 2000. Belief in God in the Age of Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ʿAbduljabbār, Qāḍī. 2013. Sharḥ al-Uṣūl al-Khamsa. Istanbul: Turkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı.Google Scholar
ʿAbduljabbār, Qāḍī 1962–1965. al-Mughnī fī Abwābi al-ʿAdl wa-l-Tawhīd, eds. Madkur, Ibrahim, Husayn, Taha, Khudayri, Mahmud M.. Cairo: al-Dar al-Misriyya.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1963. “Al-Fa¯ra¯bı¯on the Question: Is Existence a Predicate?” in Studies in the History of Arabic Logic, ed. Rescher, Nicholas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 39–42.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1966. “The Concept of Existence in Arabic Logic and Philosophy,” in Studies in Arabic Philosophy, ed. Rescher, Nicholas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 69–80.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad H. 2000. “Roots of an Aporia in Later Islamic Philosophy: The Existence-Essence Distinction in the Philosophies of Avicenna and Suhrawardı¯,” Studia Iranica, 29, 61–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rūmī, Jalāl al-Dīn. 1925–1940. The Mathnawī of Rūmī, ed. and trans. Nicholson, Reynold A., 8 vols. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey, and Peacocke, Arthur. Eds. 1995. Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey, and Peacocke, Arthur 1997. “Does ‘the God Who Acts’ Really Act? New Approaches to Divine Action in the Light of Science,” Theology Today, 54.1, 64–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey, and Peacocke, Arthur 2006. “Quantum Physics and Theology of Non-Intervenionist Objective Divine Action,” in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, eds. Clayton, Philip and Simpson, Zachary. New York: Oxford University Press, 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabūnī., n.d. Maturidiyye Akaidi (al-Bidāya fī Uṣūl al-Dīn), Turkish trans. Bekir Topaloğlu. Istanbul: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı.Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas. 2002. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahrastānī, 1934. Nihāyat al-Iqdām, ed. Alfred Guillaume, . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suhrawardī, . 1999. The Philosophy of Illumination: A New Critical Edition of the Text of Hikmat al-Ishraq, with English trans., notes, commentary and intro. Walbridge, J. and Ziai, H.. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
Süt, Abdulnasır. 2015. “İlahi Teklifin Ahlaki ve Kelami Arka Planı: Teklīf-i Mā Lā Yutāk Örneği,” Mukaddime, 6.2, 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Thomas F. 2006. “Theologies of Divine Action,” in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, eds. Clayton, Philip and Simpson, Zachary. New York: Oxford University Press, 596–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ess, Josef. 1991–1997. Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra. Eine Geschichte des religiosen Denkens im fruhen Islam, 6 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. 1965. “Muʿammar’s Theory of Maʿnā,” in Arabic and Islamic Studies in the Honor of Hamilton A.R. Gibb, ed. Makdisi, George. Leiden: Brill, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. 1976. The Philosophy of Kalam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by