Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:00:00.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Second Language Acquisition

Input

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2024

John Truscott
John Truscott
Affiliation:
National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan

Summary

Input is the name of a topic – the way that language 'out there' impacts the development of interlanguage, within the individual. It is perhaps the most important aspect of second language learning. This Element offers an overview of the key concepts related to input and the major lines of research exploring its nature and its role in second language learning. It then puts things together into a coherent, if controversial, picture of input and its role in development, emphasizing the place of consciousness. In this and most other current perspectives, implicit (unconscious) input-based learning is the heart of second language acquisition. This suggests two general options for teaching: (a) trust the natural implicit processes, trying to create optimal conditions for them; (b) direct those processes to selected features of the input, probably using explicit instruction. The conclusion is that (a) appears preferable.
Get access

Keywords

inputsecond language acquisitionperceptionlanguage teachinglanguage learning
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Second Language Acquisition
Online ISBN: 9781009063609
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 27 June 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In Meyer, D. E. and Kornblum, S., eds., Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 182–218.Google Scholar
Asher, J. (2012). Learning Another Language Through Actions. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions.Google Scholar
Baars, B. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baars, B. (1997). In the Theater of Consciousness: The Workspace of the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W. & Anderson, M. C. (2020). Memory, 3rd ed., London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., Hitch, G. & Allen, R. (2021). A multicomponent model of working memory. In Logie, R., Camos, V., and Cowan, N., eds., Working Memory: State of the Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 10–43.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. (1985). Input: Choosing the right stuff. In Gass, S. and Madden, C., eds., Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury, pp. 404–14.Google Scholar
Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In Cooper, H. and Hedges, L., eds., The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 400–9.Google Scholar
Behrmann, M. (2010). Agnosia: Visual. In Goldstein, E. B., ed., Encyclopedia of Perception. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
Benati, A. (2016). Input manipulation, enhancement and processing: Theoretical views and empirical research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., He, L. et al. (2017). Typographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27, 448–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.) (2007). Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J. & Kempe, V. (2013). Individual differences in adult foreign language learning:The mediating effect of metalinguistic awareness. Memory and Cognition, 41, 281–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, D., Liu, Q. & Norouzian, R. (2023, online). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback in developing L2 accuracy: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221147374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E. (1999). Putting “input” in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. (2001). Input and Evidence: The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F. & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35, 243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, A. C-S. (2019). Effects of narrow reading and listening on L2 vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 769–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, K. S., Ahn, K. O. & Krashen, S. D. (2005). The effects of narrow reading of authentic texts on interest and reading ability in English as a foreign language. Reading Improvement, 42, 58–64.Google Scholar
Choi, S. (2017). Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21, 403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R. A. (2014). The Neuropsychology of Attention, 2nd ed., New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, V. P. (1992). The Canadian bilingual immersion debate: A synthesis of research findings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, V. P. & Thomas, W. P. (2017). Validating the power of bilingual schooling: Thirty-two years of large-scale, longitudinal research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P., Ningrum, S. & Lee, I. (2022 online). Research trends in L2 written corrective feedback: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of Scopus-indexed research on L2 WCF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, E. M. & Shapson, S. M. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R., Bassett, J., Bowler, B. et al. (2016). Extensive Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. M. B. & Starreveld, P. A. (2015). Parallel language activation in bilinguals’ word production and its modulating factors: A review and computer simulations. In Schwieter, J. W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2020). How We Learn: Why Brains Learn Better Than Any Machine … For Now. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2017). Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2020). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Esposito, M. & Postle, B. R. (2015). The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 115–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H., eds., The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 256–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M. & Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekiert, M. & di Gennaro, K. (2021). Focused written corrective feedback and linguistic target mastery: Conceptual replication of Bitchener and Knoch (2010). Language Teaching, 54, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elley, W. B. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effects of book-based programs. Language Learning, 41, 375–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elley, W. B. (2000). The potential of book floods for raising literacy levels. International Review of Education, 46, 233–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (Ed.) (1994). Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2015). Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In Rebuschat, P., ed., Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Wulff, S. (2020). Usage-based approaches to L2 acquisition. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C. et al. (2009). Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Feddermann, M., Möller, J. & Baumert, J. (2021). Effects of CLIL on second language learning: Disentangling selection, preparation, and CLIL-effects. Learning and Instruction, 74, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2009). Give input a chance! In Piske, T. and Young-Scholten, M., eds., Input Matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 175–190.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983) The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascoigne, C. (2006). Explicit input enhancement: Effects on target and non-target aspects of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 551–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Behney, J. & Plonsky, L. (2020). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course, 5th ed., New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2020). Input, interaction, and output in L2 acquisition. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 192–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., Spinner, P. & Behney, J. (Eds.) (2018). Salience in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. (2020). Eye Tracking in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism: A Research Synthesis and Methodological Guide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S. & Dixon, L. Q. (2018). Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. LACLIL, 11(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. D. (2010). Agnosia: Auditory. In Goldstein, E. B., ed., Encyclopedia of Perception. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 26–8.Google Scholar
Hama, M. & Leow, R. P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisited: Extending Williams (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 465–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z., Park, E. S. & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2019). How Second Languages Are Learned: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henke, K. (2010). A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iswandari, Y. A. & Paradita, L. I. (2019). Extensive reading In EFL settings: A special interview with Professor Paul Nation. TEFLIN Journal, 30(2), 187–96.Google Scholar
Ivone, F. M. & Renandya, W. A. (2019). Extensive listening and viewing in ELT. TEFLIN Journal, 30, 237–56.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2012). A User’s Guide to Thought and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. Y. & Day, R. R. (2016). The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 246–65.Google Scholar
Kang, E. Y. (2015). Promoting L2 vocabulary learning through narrow reading. RELC Journal, 46, 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, E. & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 99, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, S. & Trofimovich, P. (2017). Pronunciation acquisition. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 260–79.Google Scholar
Koch, C. & Tsuchiya, N. (2012). Attention and consciousness: Related yet different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 103–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. ( 1983). Newmark’s ‘ignorance hypothesis’ and current second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L., eds., Language Transfer in Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury, pp. 135–53.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1992). Formal grammar instruction … another educator comments … TESOL Quarterly, 26, 409–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1993). The effect of formal grammar teaching: Still peripheral. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 722–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1996). The case for narrow listening. System, 24, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (2004). The case for narrow reading. Language Magazine, 3(5), 17–19.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. & Terrell, T. D. (1988). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Gullifer, J. W., McClain, R., Rossi, E. & Martín, M. C. (2015). Selection and control in bilingual comprehension and production. In Schwieter, J. W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., Poehner, M. E. & Thorne, S. L. (2020). Sociocultural theory and L2 development. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 223–47.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Complex dynamic systems theory: The theory and its constructs. In . VanPatten, , Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 248–70.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-K. & Huang, H.-T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom: A Student-Centered Approach. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, J. H. C. & Williams, J. N. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtman, K. & VanPatten, B. (2021). Was Krashen right? Forty years later. Foreign Language Annals, 54, 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In Seliger, H. W. and Long, M. H., eds., Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 217–43.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1985). Input and acquisition for second language learners in and out of classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 6, 263–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1987). Classroom language as input to second language acquisition. In Pfaff, C. W., ed., First and Second Language Acquisition Processes. Cambridge: Newbury, pp. 169–87.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N. & Wallace, R. (1980). Some effects of instruction on child and adolescent ESL learners. In Scarcella, R. and Krashen, S. D., eds., Research in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Papers of the Los Angeles Second Language Acquisition Research Forum. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 162–72.Google Scholar
Lim, S. C. & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Efficacy of written corrective feedback in writing instruction: A meta-analysis. TESL-EJ, 24(3), 1–26.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2020). Introduction to Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.) (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. B., and Kramsch, C., eds., Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T., eds., Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 413–68.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Doughty, C. and Williams, J., eds., Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–41.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In Robinson, P., ed., Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, pp. 211–27.Google Scholar
Martínez Agudo, J. D. (2020). The impact of CLIL on English language competence in a monolingual context: A longitudinal perspective. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, B. & Krashen, S. (2020a). The promise of “optimal input.” Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(3), 146–55. http://beniko-mason.net/content/articles/2020-10-20-revised-the-promise-of-optimal-input.pdf.Google Scholar
Mason, B. & Krashen, S. (2020b). Story-Listening: A brief introduction. CATESOL Newsletter, July, 53(7). www.catesol.org/v_newsletters/article_158695931.htm.Google Scholar
Mason, B., Smith, K. & Krashen, S. (2020). Story-Listening in Indonesia: A replication study. Journal of English Language Teaching, 62(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
Masrai, A. (2019). Can L2 phonological vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension be developed through extensive movie viewing? The case of Arab EFL learners. International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, G. (2011). Essentials of Sensation and Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matsuo, S. (2015). Extensive Listening inside and outside the classroom. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 20, 109–15.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F. & Marsden, E. (2019). Second Language Learning Theories, 4th ed., New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, T. (2014). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. Ed.D dissertation, Temple University.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, T. (2015). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 6–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017). Grammar acquisition. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 205–23.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, Q. R., Renandya, W. A. & Chong, M. Y. C. (2019). Extensive reading: Theory, research and implementation. Teflin Journal, 30(2), 171–86.Google Scholar
Nobre, A. C. & Mesulam, M.-M. (2014). Large-scale networks for attentional biases. In Kastner, S. and Nobre, A. C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675111.013.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W. (2015). Processing determinism. Language Learning, 65, 6–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H., Choi, S. & Lee, M. (2012). Visual input enhancement, attention, grammar learning, and reading comprehension: An eye movement study. English Teaching, 67, 241–65.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. & Boers, F. (2019). Pedagogical approaches to the teaching and learning of formulaic language. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. and Pellicer-Sánchez, A., eds., Understanding Formulaic Language: A Second Language Acquisition Perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 153–73.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1983a). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (1983b). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Lenzing, A. (2020). Processability theory. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 162–90.Google Scholar
Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.) (2009). Input Matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I. (2012). Attention in a Social World. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I. & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I. & Rothbart, M. K. (1992). Attentional mechanisms and conscious experience. In Milner, A. D. and Rugg, M. D., eds., The Neuropsychology of Consciousness. London: Academic Press, pp. 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, T. & Unsworth, S. (2016). Beyond poverty: Engaging with input in generative SLA. Second Language Research, 32, 563–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. & Allen, R. (Eds.) (2022). The Cognitive Unconscious: The First Half Century. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (Ed.) (2015). Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2022). Implicit learning and language acquisition: Three approaches, one phenomenon. In Reber, A. S. and Allen, R., eds., The Cognitive Unconscious: The First Half Century. New York: Oxford University Press pp. 115–38.Google Scholar
Reynolds, B. L. & Kao, C.-W. (2022). A research synthesis of unfocused feedback studies in the L2 writing classroom: Implications for future research. Journal of Language and Education, 8(4), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, M. (2016). Extensive listening and viewing: The benefits of audiobooks and television. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 5(2), 43–57.Google Scholar
Rodgers, M., & Webb, S. (2011). Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 689–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J., Révész, A. & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Implicit and explicit knowledge of inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 781–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L., eds., Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 133–64.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. E. & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 274–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C. & Leow, R. (Eds.) (2011). Implicit and Explicit Language Learning: Conditions, Processes, and Knowledge in SLA and Bilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24, 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schendan, H., Searl, M., Melrose, R. & Stern, C. (2003). An fMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Neuron, 37(6), 1013–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Schmidt, R., ed., Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i, pp. 3–63.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P., ed., Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. R., ed., Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury, pp. 237–326.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (2015). Bilingual lexical access during written sentence comprehension. In Schwieter, J. W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 327–48.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–68.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118–32.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–79.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1996). The Garden of Eden and Beyond: On Second Language Processing. CLCS Occasional Paper no. 44, Trinity College, Dublin.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (2021). Internal context, language acquisition and multilingualism. Second Language Research, 37, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. & Truscott, J. (2014a). Explaining input enhancement: A MOGUL perspective. IRAL, 52, 253–81.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. & Truscott, J. (2014b). The Multilingual Mind: A Modular Processing Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., Leal, T., Dudley, A. & Stack, M. (2020). Generative Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, M. A., Met, M. & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, K. & Wixted, J. T. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 259–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, Y. & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67, 747–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). On communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. M. and Madden, C. G., eds., Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury, pp. 235–53.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1991). French immersion and its offshoots: Getting two for one. In Freed, B. F., ed., Foreign Language Acquisition Research and the Classroom. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, pp. 91–103.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2005). The Output Hypothesis: Theory and Research. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 471–83.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (2014). Enduring questions from the Interlanguage Hypothesis. In Han, Z. and Tarone, E., eds., Interlanguage Forty Years Later. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, T. D. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. Modern Language Journal, 75, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, T. D., Baycroft, B. & Perrone, C. (1987). The subjunctive in Spanish interlanguage: Accuracy and comprehensibility. In VanPatten, B., Dvorak, T. R., and Lee, J. F., eds., Foreign Language Learning: A Research Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Newbury, pp. 119–32.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trahey, M. & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14, 103–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting errors for selective error correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27, 225–40.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2004). The effectiveness of grammar instruction: Analysis of a meta-analysis. English Teaching & Learning, 28(3), 17–29.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2007a). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (2007b). Grammar teaching and the evidence: A response to Nassaji and Fotos (2004). International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. Available on ResearchGate.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2015). Consciousness and Second Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2016). The effectiveness of error correction: Why do meta-analytic reviews produce such different answers? In Leung, Y.-N., ed., Epoch Making in English Teaching and Learning: Evolution, Innovation, Revolution. Taipei: Crane, pp. 126–41.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2020). The efficacy of written corrective feedback: A critique of a meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript. National Tsing Hua University. Available on Research Gate.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2022a). Efficacy of written corrective feedback in writing instruction: A critique of another meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript. National Tsing Hua University. Available on Research Gate.Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (2022b). Working Memory and Language in the Modular Mind. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (2023). What about validity? Thoughts on the state of research on written corrective feedback. Feedback in Second Language, 1, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. & Sharwood Smith, M. (2004). Acquisition by processing: A modular approach to language development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. & Sharwood Smith, M. (2011). Input, intake, and consciousness: The quest for a theoretical foundation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. & Sharwood Smith, M. (2019). The Internal Context of Bilingual Processing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, A. (2022). Effects of narrow listening on ESL learners’ pronunciation and fluency: An “MP3 flood” programme turning mundane homework into an engaging hobby. Language Teaching Research, 26, 434–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (2000). Concepts of memory. In Tulving, E. and Craik, I. M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2016). The Declarative/Procedural Model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In Hickok, G. and Small, S. L., eds., Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 953–68.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2020). The Declarative/Procedural Model: A neurobiologically motivated model of first and second language learning, knowledge, and use. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd edn, New York: Routledge, pp. 128–60.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1988). How juries get hung: Problems with the evidence for a focus on form in teaching. Language Learning, 38, 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features & research methodology. AILA Review, 11, 27–36.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2009). Processing matters in input enhancement. In Piske, T. and Young-Scholten, M., eds., Input Matters in SLA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2015). Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2017). Processing instruction. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 166–80). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2020). Input processing in adult L2 acquisition. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 105–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D. & Wulff, S. (Eds.) (2020). Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., Smith, M. & Benati, A. G. (2020). Key Questions in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watzinger-Tharp, J., Rubio, F. & Tharp, D. S. (2018). Linguistic performance of dual language immersion students. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 575–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2015). Extensive viewing: Language learning through watching television. In Nunan, D. and Richards, J. C., eds., Language Learning Beyond the Classroom. New York: Routledge, pp. 159–68.Google Scholar
Weinert, R. (1987). Processes in classroom second language development: The acquisition of negation in German. In Ellis, R., ed., Second Language Acquisition in Context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar
White, E. J., Titone, D., Genesee, F. & Steinhauer, K. (2017). Phonological processing in late second language learners: The effects of proficiency and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(1), 162–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (2020). Linguistic theory, Universal Grammar, and second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., and Wulff, S., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 3rd ed., New York: Routledge, pp. 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,27, 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winitz, H. (Ed.) (1981). The Comprehension Approach to Foreign Language Instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury.Google Scholar
Winitz, H. (2020). Comprehension Strategies in the Acquiring of a Second Language. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Kluender, K. R., Levi, D. M. et al. (2018). Sensation and Perception, 5th ed., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (1994). On positive evidence and ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Second Language Research, 10, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Input
  • John Truscott, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
  • Online ISBN: 9781009063609
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Input
  • John Truscott, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
  • Online ISBN: 9781009063609
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Input
  • John Truscott, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
  • Online ISBN: 9781009063609
Available formats
×