Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:04:45.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Defence Economics

How Important are Superior Numbers?

A Reappraisal of Lanchester's Square Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2021

David L. I. Kirkpatrick
David L. I. Kirkpatrick
Affiliation:
University College London

Summary

A century ago Frederick Lanchester formulated a mathematical model of combat which suggested that the combat power of a military force was proportional to the product of the individual effectiveness of the units in the force and the square of the number of units deployed. This model reinforced a long-established faith in the importance of superior numbers. However, successive historical studies failed to identify any clear relationship between the numbers and losses in opposing forces. This Element analyses American Civil War battles, and shows that the ratio of losses incurred was inversely proportional to the ratio of numbers effectively engaged. This result demonstrates that the numbers of fighting units in a military force are less important than the ability of those units to get into action and inflict losses on the enemy. This result demonstrates the limitations of the Square Law, and should prevent it from being applied indiscriminately.
Get access

Keywords

American Civil Warsuperior numbersLanchester’s Square Lawquality versus quantitydefence policy
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Defence Economics
Online ISBN: 9781108973458
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 04 March 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augustine, N. (1983) Augustine’s Laws, New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Bennett, G. (1967) Coronel and the Falkland Islands, London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
Busse, J. (1971) An Attempt to Verify Lanchester’s Equations, Proceedings of the Third Israel Conference on Operational Research.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. (2002) The Military Maxims of Napoleon; Maxim 29, London: Greenhill Books.Google Scholar
Davis, W. 1983 The Civil War, Virginia: Time-Life Books.Google Scholar
Dupuy, T. (1985) Numbers, Prediction and War, Virginia: Hero Books.Google Scholar
Eccles, N. (1999) Validation and Tactical Decision Making in Generalised Lanchester Combat Models, Cranfield University thesis, unpublished.Google Scholar
Engel, J. (1954) A Verification of Lanchester’s Law, Operations Research, Volume 2, pp. 163–171.Google Scholar
Epstein, J. (1985) The Calculus of Conventional War, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Fain, J. (1977) The Lanchester Equations and Historical Warfare, History, Numbers and War Volume 1, pp. 34–52.Google Scholar
Foote, S. (1963) The Civil War: a Narrative, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ford, R. (1998) The Tiger Tank, Kent: Spellmount,Google Scholar
Fricker, D. (1998) Attrition Models of the Ardennes Campaign, Naval Research Logistics Volume 45, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. (1958) The Generalship of Ulysses S. Grant, New York: Plenum Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1994) First World War, London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Halpern, P. G. (1994) A Naval History of World War I, London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
Hayman, P. (1980) References on the Lanchester Theory of Combat to 1980, England: RMCS.Google Scholar
James, L. (1998) Raj: the Making and Unmaking of British India, London: The Softback Preview.Google Scholar
Kaldor, M. (1982) The Baroque Arsenal, London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
Kennedy, F. (1990) The Civil War Battlefield Guide, Boston: Houghton Mufflin.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D. (1985) Do Lanchester’s Equations Adequately Model Real Battles? RUSI Journal June pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
Kishi, T. (1961) The Lanchester Theory of Combat, unpublished.Google Scholar
Lanchester, F. (1916) Aircraft in Warfare; Dawn of the Fourth Arm, London: Constable and Co.Google Scholar
Livermore, T. (1901) Numbers and Losses in the Civil War in America, Ohio, Riverside Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, J. (1982) Ordeal by Fire: The Civil War and Reconstruction, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
McPherson, J. (1988) Battle Cry of Freedom, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McWhiney, G. (1982) Attack and Die, University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Macksey, K. (1988) Tank versus Tank, London, Bantam Press.Google Scholar
Macksey, K. (2006) Why the Germans Lose at War, London, Greenhill Books.Google Scholar
Mead, G. (2008) The Good Soldier – the Biography of Douglas Haig, London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Overy, R. (2001) The Battle of Britain, New York: Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Sears, S. (1992) To the Gates of Richmond, New York: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
Underwood, R. ed., (1887) Battles and Leaders of the Civil War, New Jersey: Castle.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. (1770) Lettre a M. le Riche, 6th FebruaryGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. (1957) Lanchester-type Models of Warfare, Proceedings of International Conference on Operational Research pp. 82–99, Oxford September.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. (1966) Combat Models and Historical Data; the US Civil War, Operations Research Volume 14, pp. 759–790Google Scholar
Willard, D. (1962) Lanchester as a Force in History, unpublished.Google Scholar
Wood, D., and Dempster, D. (1961) The Narrow Margin, London:Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How Important are Superior Numbers?
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

How Important are Superior Numbers?
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

How Important are Superior Numbers?
Available formats
×