Element contents
Historiographic Reasoning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2025
Summary
Historiographic reasoning from evidentiary inputs is sui generis. Historiography is neither empirical, nor self-knowledge, nor a genre of fiction or ideology. Historiographic reasoning is irreducible to general scientific or social science reasoning. The book applies Bayesian insights to explicate historiographic reasoning as probable. It distinguishes epistemic transmission of knowledge from evidence from the generation of detailed historiographic knowledge from multiple coherent and independent evidentiary inputs in three modular stages. A history of historiographic reasoning since the late 18th century demonstrates that there was a historiographic scientific revolution across the historical sciences in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The underdetermination of historiography by the evidence, counterfactual historiographic reasoning, and false reasoning and other fallacies are further explained and discussed in terms of the probabilistic relations between the evidence and historiography.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009324489Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 30 January 2025
References
Anava, Sarit, Neuhof, Moran, Gingold, Hila, et al. (2020) “Illuminating Genetic Mysteries of the Dead Sea Scrolls,” Cell, 181(6), 1218–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ankersmit, Frank (1995) “Statements, Texts and Pictures,” in Ankersmit, Frank & Kellner, Hans, eds. A New Philosophy of History. London: Reaktion Books, 212–240.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank (2001) Historical Representation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank (2012) Meaning, Truth, and Reference in Historical Representation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Batty, David (2020) “Court Fines Historian over Claims of Holocaust Survivor’s Lesbian Affair,” The Guardian, December 21.Google Scholar
Ben‐Menahem, Yemima (2009) “Historical Necessity and Contingency,” in Tucker, Aviezer, ed., A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 120–130.Google Scholar
Ben-Menahem, Yemima (2016) “If Counterfactuals Were Excluded from Historical Reasoning …,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(3), 370–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertsch-McGrayne, Sharon (2011) The Theory that Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, & Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc (1961). Feudal Society. Trans. Manyon, L. A., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bovens, Luc, & Hartmann, Stephan (2003) Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buck, Caitlin E., Cavanagh, W. G., & Litton, C. D. eds. (1996) Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter (2019) Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Image as Historical Evidence. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Carrier, Richard (2012) Proving History: Bayes’s Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Carrier, Richard (2014) On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. (2001) “Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method,” Geology, 29(11), 987–990.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. (2002) “Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science,” Philosophy of Science, 69, 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. (2009) “Philosophical Issues in Natural History and Its Historiography,” in Tucker, Avierez, ed., A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 44–62.Google Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. (2011) “Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, David (2004) “Preempting Preemption,” in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, & Paul, Laurie A., eds., Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry M. (2010) Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2004) “Preemptive Preemption,” in Collins, John, Ned Hall, , & Paul, Laurie A., eds., Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Adrian (2018) Rock, Bone and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, Arthur (1985) Narration and Knowledge (including the integral text of Analytical Philosophy of History). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine (1988) Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cecco, Marcello (1985) “Monetary Theory and Roman History,” The Journal of Economic History, 45, 809–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith (2009) The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimova-Cookson, Maria (2019) Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael (1978) Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1978) Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1999) Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. (2016) “Response,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(3), 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, Luciano (2010) Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg (1989) Truth and Method. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall, London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo (1980) The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth Century Miller. Trans. John & Anna Tedeschi, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Leon J. (1996) The What and the Why of History: Philosophical Essays. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooch, George Peabody (1959) History and Historians in the Nineteenth Century. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony (1990) Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony (1997) The Footnote, A Curious History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, Most, Glenn W., & Zetzel, , James, E. G. (1985) “Introduction,” in Wolf, Friedrich A., Prolegomena to Homer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–25.Google Scholar
Greco, John (2020) The Transmission of Knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Heggarty, Paul, & Gray, Russell D. (2020) “Bayesian Phylolinguistics,” in Janda, Richard D., Joseph, Brian D., & Vance, Barbara S., eds., The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 226–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Ned (2004a) “Causation and the Price of Transitivity,” in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, & Paul, Laurie A., eds., Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Ned (2004b) “Two Concepts of Causation,” in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, & Paul, Laurie A., eds., Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 225–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, Michael P. Jaffe, Andrew H., Liddle, Andrew R., Mukherjee, Pia, & Parkinson, David, eds. (2010) Bayesian Methods in Cosmology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inkpen, Rib, & Turner, Derek (2012) “The Topography of Historical Contingency,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 6(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Daniel, & Mandel, David R. (2019) “Improving Information Evaluation for Intelligence Production,” Intelligence and National Security, 34(4), 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Nick (2008) “Explanatory Genealogies and Historical Testimony,” Episteme, 5, 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Anthony K. (2013) Nietzsche’s Philosophy of History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosso, Peter (2001) Knowing the Past: Philosophical Issues of History and Archaeology. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti (2015) Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography. New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplace, Pierre-Simon (1840) Essai philosophique sur les probabilités, 6th Edition, Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1979) “Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow,” Noûs, 13(4), 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1986) Philosophical Papers Vol. II. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (2004) “Causation as Influence,” in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, & Paul, Laurie A., 2004. Causation and Counterfactuals, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce (1999) Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maar, Alexander (2016) “Applying D. K. Lewis’s Counterfactual Theory of Causation to the Philosophy of Historiography,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaterre, Christophe (2024) “Overdetermination, underdetermination, and epistemic granularity in the historical sciences,” European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 14, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice (1977) The Anatomy of Historical Knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, David (2019) “Czech Totalitarianism Institute Faces Questions over Research,” Times Higher Education, August 20.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich (1972) Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook. Trans. J. E. Anderson. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo (1977) Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, John (2021) “Research Misconduct Ruling on Historian’s Holocaust Affair Claim,” Times Higher Education, February 4, 2021, Online edition.Google Scholar
Murphey, Murray G. (1973) Our Knowledge of the Historical Past. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Murphey, Murray G. (1994) Philosophical Foundations of Historical Knowledge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Murphey, Murray G. (2009) Truth and History. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, Daniel (2016) “The Possibilities of History,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(3), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Milman & Parry, Adam, ed. (1971) The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Razi, Zvi (1980) Life, Marriage, and Death in a Medieval Parish: Economy, Society, and Demography in Halesowen, 1270–1400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ressa, Maria (2023) How to Stand Up to a Dictator: The Fight for Our Future. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Rood, Tim (2006) “Objectivity and Authority: Thucydides’ Historical Method,” in Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, Rengakos, Antoninos & Tsakmakis, Antonis, eds., Leiden: Brill, 225–249.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Gavriel D. (2016) “The Ways We Wonder “What If?”: Towards a Typology of Historical Counterfactuals,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(3), 382–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabar, Ariel (2020) Veritas: A Harvard Professor, a Con Man and the Gospel of Jesus’s Wife. New York, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1998) “Rationality and Objectivity in Science or Tom Kuhn Meets Tom Bayes,” in Curd, Martin & Cover, J. A., eds., Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 551–583.Google Scholar
Santayana, George (1954) The Life of Reason, or The Phases of Human Progress. New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2004) “Trumping Preemption,” in Collins, John, Hall, Ned, & Paul, Laurie A., eds., Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrier, Thomas & Michonneau, Stéphane (2019) “One heritage, one story: That’s not the Europe we know,” The Guardian, 17 April 2019.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude Elwood (1964) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy (2015) Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning. New York, NY: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (2016) “Historical Explanations Always Involve Counterfactual History,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(3), 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott (1988) Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim (2016) “Contingency and History.” Philosophy of Science, 8(4), 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Arthur John, ed., (1975) The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2004) Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2006) “Temporal Provincialism: Anachronism, Retrospection and Evidence,” Scientia Poetica, 10, 299–317.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2009) “The Philosophy of Natural History and Historiography,” review of: Derek Turner, Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007) and Rob Inkpen, Science, Philosophy and Physical Geography (London: Routledge, 2005), Journal of the Philosophy of History, 3, 385–394.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2012) “Sciences of Tokens and Types: The Difference between History and the Social Sciences,” in Kincaid, Harold, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 274–297.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2014) “Epistemology as a Social Science: Applying the Neuman-Rubin Method to Explain Expert Beliefs,” in Martini, Carlo & Boumans, Marcel, eds., Experts and Consensus in Social Science, Dordrecht: Springer, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2016) “The Malthusian Holocaust: Review of Timothy Snyder, Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning,” The American Interest, 11(5), (2016), 76–88.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2020) “Origins and Genealogies,” in Jensen, Anthony & Santini, Carlotte, eds., Nietzsche on Memory and History: the Re-Encountered Shadow, Berlin: de Gruyter, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2021) “Forbidding Fruit: Apple TV+ Does Asimov: Asimov’s Foundation stories are a thought experiment in the social sciences,” American Purpose, October 8, online.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2023) “Critical Reliability: A Bayesian Program for Intelligence Analysis,” Journal of Intelligence & Analysis, 26(1), 76–96.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer (2024) “Historiographic Populist Emotivism,” in Bevernage, Berber, Mestdagh, Eline, Ramalho, Walderez & Verbergt, Marie-Gabrielle, eds., Claiming the People’s Past: Populist Politics of History in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 248–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer & Garfinkle, Adam (2018) “The Etiology of Faked News,” The American Interest, 14(1), 31–35.Google Scholar
Turner, Derek (2007) Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dam, Andrew (2024) “Why Are Republicans More Likely to Suffer Hearing Loss?” The Washington Post, February 9.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bass (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vico, Giambattista (1984) [1744] The New Science, trans. Bergin, Thomas Goddard & Fisch, Max Harold, London, UK: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wallach, Efraim (2018) “Bayesian Representation of a Prolonged Archaeological Debate,” Synthese 195, 401–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden (1978) Tropics of Discourse. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden (1987) The Content of the Form. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, Hayden (1992) “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth,” in Friedlander, Saul, ed., Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the “Final Solution,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 37–53.Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (2015) “Critical or Genetic Method (1883),” in Luft, Sebastian, ed., The Neo-Kantian Reader, New York, NY: Routledge, 271–286.Google Scholar
Wolf, Friedrich A. (1985) Prolegomena to Homer, Trans. Anthony Grafton, Most, Glenn W., & Zetzel, James E. G., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–25.Google Scholar
Wolin, Richard (2013) “Biblical Blame Shift: Is the Egyptologist Jan Assmann Fueling Anti-Semitism?” The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 15.Google Scholar
Woolf, Daniel (2016) “Concerning Altered Pasts: Reflections of an Early Modern Historian,” Journal of the Philosophy of History, 10(3), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This Element is free online from 30th January 2025 - 27th February 2025