Element contents
Fundamentality and Grounding
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2022
Summary
A suite of questions concerning fundamentality lies at the heart of contemporary metaphysics. The relation of grounding, thought to connect the more to the less fundamental, sits at the heart of those debates in turn. Since most contemporary metaphysicians embrace the doctrine of physicalism and thus hold that reality is fundamentally physical, a natural question is how physics can inform the current debates over fundamentality and grounding. This Element introduces the reader to the concept of grounding and some of the key issues that animate contemporary debates around it, such as the question of whether grounding is 'unified' or 'plural' and whether there exists a fundamental level of reality. It moves on to show how resources from physics can help point the way towards their answers - thus furthering the case for a naturalistic approach to even the most fundamental of questions in metaphysics.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108657617Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 03 March 2022
References
Abell, C. (2012). ‘Art: What It Is and Why It Matters’. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85.3, pp. 671–691. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00498.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle (Vol. 2, pp. 1552–1728). Ed. Barnes, J. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, P. (2012). ‘Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-Of Relation’. In: Journal of Philosophy 109.12, pp. 685–711. http://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20121091232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, E. (2018). ‘Symmetric Dependence’. In: Reality and Its Structure. Ed. Bliss, R. L and Priest, G. Oxford University Press. pp. 50–69.Google Scholar
Baron, S. and Norton, J. (2019). ‘Metaphysical Explanation: The Kitcher Picture’. In: Erkenntnis, 86.1, pp. 187–207. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-00101-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, H. (2000). ‘The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature’. In: Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61.3, pp. 571–594. http://doi.org/10.2307/2653613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berker, S. (2018). ‘The Unity of Grounding’. In: Mind 127.507, pp. 729–777. http://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertulani, C. A. and Danielewicz, P. (2019). Introduction to Nuclear Reactions. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bhogal, H. (forthcoming). ‘Nomothetic Explanation and Humeanism About Laws of Nature’. In: Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bigaj, T. and Wüthrich, C. (2016). ‘Introduction’. In: Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Ed. Bigaj, T and Wüthrich, C. Brill Rodolpi, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Bitbol, M. (2007). ‘Schrodinger against Particles and Quantum Jumps’. In: Quantum Mechanics at the Crossroads. Ed. Evans, J and Thorndike, A. S. Springer, pp. 81–106.Google Scholar
Bliss, R. and Priest, G. (2018). ‘Introduction’. In: Reality and Its Structure. Ed. Bliss, R. L and Priest, G, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Bliss, R. and Trogdon, K. 2019: ‘Metaphysical Grounding’, In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition). Ed. Zalta, Edward N. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/grounding.Google Scholar
Bliss, R. L. (2013). ‘Viciousness and the Structure of Reality’. In: Philosophical Studies 166.2, pp. 399–418. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-0043-0.Google Scholar
Bohn, E. D. (2018). ‘Infinitely Descending Ground’. In: Reality and Its Structure. Ed. Bliss, R. L and Priest, G. Oxford University Press, pp. 167–181.Google Scholar
Born, M. (1956). ‘Physics and Metaphysics’. In: The Scientific Monthly 82.5, pp. 229–235.Google Scholar
Brown, R. and Ladyman, J. (2009). ‘Physicalism, Supervenience and the Fundamental Level’. In: Philosophical Quarterly 59.234, pp. 20–38. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.613.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, A. (2018). ‘Naturalizing Grounding: How Theories of Ground Can Engage Science’. In: Philosophy Compass, 13.5, e12489. http://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12489.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2001). ‘Why Be a Fundamentalist: Reply to Schaffer’. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000215/S.Google Scholar
Calosi, C. and Morganti, M. (2018). ‘Interpreting Quantum Entanglement: Steps Towards Coherentist Quantum Mechanics’. In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, no. 3, p. axy064. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy064.Google Scholar
Calosi, C. (2020). ‘Priority Monism, Dependence and Fundamentality’. In: Philosophical Studies 177.1, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R. P. (2018). ‘Infinite Regress Arguments’. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). Ed. Zalta, Edward N. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/infinite-regress.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. P. (2008). ‘Turtles All the Way Down: Regress, Priority and Fundamentality’. In: Philosophical Quarterly 58.230, pp. 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.509.x.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. P. (2019). ‘Truthmaking, Second-Order Quantification, and Ontological Commitment’. In: Analytic Philosophy 60.4, pp. 336–360. http://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12162.Google Scholar
Cappelli, A. et al. (2012). ‘Introduction to Part II’. In: The Birth of String Theory. Ed. by Cappelli, A et al. Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, A. (2017). Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Correia, F. (2021). ‘A Kind Route from Grounding to Fundamentality’. In: Synthese, pp. 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03163-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2014). ‘Levels’. In: Open MIND 8(T).9–10. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group. http://doi.org/10.15502/9783958570498.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S. (2014). ‘The Possibility of Physicalism’. In: Journal of Philosophy 111.9–10, pp. 557–592. http://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20141119/1037.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S. (2017). ‘Constitutive Explanation’. In: Philosophical Issues 27.1, pp. 74–97. http://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12102.Google Scholar
Dorr, C. (2010). ‘Review of James Ladyman and Don Ross, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized’. In: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010.6.Google Scholar
Emery, N. (2019). ‘Laws and Their Instances’. In: Philosophical Studies 176.6, pp. 1535–1561. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1077-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (2012). ‘Guide to Ground’. In: Metaphysical Grounding. Ed. Correia, F and Schnieder, B. Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, S. (2014). The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
French, S. and McKenzie, K. (2012). ‘Thinking Outside the Toolbox: Towards a More Productive Engagement between Metaphysics and Philosophy of Physics’. In: European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8.1, pp. 42–59.Google Scholar
French, S. and McKenzie, K. (2016). ‘Rethinking Outside the Toolbox: Reflecting Again on the Relationship between Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics.’ In: Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Ed. Bigaj, T and Wüthrich, C.. Brill Rodopi, pp. 25–54.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2018). ‘Ernst Cassirer’. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward. Zalta, N. Fall 2018. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/cassirerGoogle Scholar
Glazier, M. (2020). ‘Explanation’. In: Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding. Ed. Raven, M. J, pp. 121–132. Routledge.Google Scholar
Guay, A. and Pradeu, T. (2020). ‘Right Out of the Box: How to Situate Metaphysics of Science in Relation to Other Metaphysical Approaches’. In: Synthese 197.5, pp. 1847–1866. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1576-8.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, J. (2015). ‘Hume on Spatial Properties’. In: Nominalism About Properties: New Essays. Ed. Ghislain, G and Gonzalo, R. Routledge, pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
Hall, N. 2010. David Lewis’s Metaphysics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition). Ed. Zalta, Edward N. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/lewis-metaphysics.Google Scholar
Hicks, M. T. and Schaffer, J. (2017). ‘Derivative Properties in Fundamental Laws’. In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68.2, pp. 411–450. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv039.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, T. (2020). ‘Non-Humean Theories of Natural Necessity’. In: Philosophy Compass 15.5, e12662. http://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12662.Google Scholar
Hoefer, C. (2003). ‘For Fundamentalism’. In: Philosophy of Science 70.5, pp. 1401–1412. http://doi.org/10.1086/377417.Google Scholar
Hofweber, T. (2009). ‘Ambitious, Yet Modest, Metaphysics’. In: Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Ed. Chalmers, D. J., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford University Press, pp. 260–289.Google Scholar
Imaguire, G. (2020). ‘Ontological Categories and the Transversality Requirement’. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien 97.4, pp. 619–639. http://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-000116.Google Scholar
Jaworski, W. (2011). Philosophy of Mind: A Comprehensive Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jeans, J. (1915). The Mathematical Theory of Electricity and Magnetism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C. (2011). ‘Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?’ In: The Monist 94.2, pp. 267–276. http://doi.org/10.5840/monist201194213.Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. (2015). ‘The Coarse-Grainedness of Grounding’. In: Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9, pp. 306–344.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. M. (2019). ‘Ricki Bliss and Graham Priest (Eds.): Reality and Its Structure: Essays in Fundamentality (Review)’. In: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2019.17. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/reality-and-its-structure-essays-in-fundamentality/__;!!Mih3wA!WP84psfxEr1VPg6Z-0Z-TXMOsORycJiN85ZWITuNez-LCgkZf0njkjg4817SkuI$.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. M. (2021). ‘The Oldest Solution to the Circularity Problem for Humeanism About the Laws of Nature’. In: Synthese, 198, pp. 8933–8953. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02608-0.Google Scholar
Ladyman, J. and Ross, D. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leuenberger, S. (2020). ‘The Fundamental: Ungrounded or All-Grounding?’ In: Philosophical Studies 177.9, pp. 2647–2669. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01332-x.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1986). ‘Against Structural Universals’. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64.1, pp. 25–46. http://doi.org/10.1080/00048408612342211.Google Scholar
Lieb, E. (1990). ‘The Stability of Matter: From Atoms to Stars’. In: Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 22, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Lieb, E. H. and Loss, M. (2001). Analysis (2nd ed.). Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 14. American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Litland, J. E. (2013). ‘On Some Counterexamples to the Transitivity of Grounding’. In: Essays in Philosophy 14.1, p. 3. http://doi.org/10.7710/1526-0569.1453.Google Scholar
Loewer, B. (2007). ‘Laws and Natural Properties’. In: Philosophical Topics 35.1/2, pp. 313–328. http://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2007351/214.Google Scholar
Loewer, B. (2012). ‘Two Accounts of Laws and Time’. In: Philosophical Studies 160.1, pp. 115–137. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9911-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, E. J. (1998). The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
MacBride, F. and Janssen-Lauret, F. (2015). ‘Meta-Ontology, Epistemology & Essence: On the Empirical Deduction of the Categories’. In: The Monist 98.3, pp. 290–302. http://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onv015.Google Scholar
Maurin, A.-S. (2007). ‘Infinite Regress - Virtue or Vice?’ In: Hommage À Wlodek. Ed. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen et al. http://www.fil.lu.se/HommageaWlodek.Google Scholar
Maurin, A.-S. (2019). ‘Grounding and Metaphysical Explanation: It’s Complicated’. In: Philosophical Studies 176.6, pp. 1573–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, K. (2011). ‘Arguing against Fundamentality’. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42.4, pp. 244–255. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.09.002.Google Scholar
McKenzie, K. (2017a). ‘Against Brute Fundamentalism’. In: Dialectica 71.2, pp. 231–261. http://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12189.Google Scholar
McKenzie, K. (2017b). ‘Relativities of Fundamentality’. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 59, pp. 89–99.Google Scholar
McKenzie, K. (2020a). ‘A Curse on Both Houses: Naturalistic versus a Priori Metaphysics and the Problem of Progress’. In: Res Philosophica 97.1, pp. 1–29. http://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1868.Google Scholar
McKenzie, K. (2020b). ‘Structuralism in the Idiom of Determination’. In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71.2, pp. 497–522. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, K. and Muller, F. (2017). ‘Bound States and the Special Composition Question’. In: EPSA15 Selected Papers. Ed. Michela Massimi, Jan-Willem Romeijn, and Gerhard Schurz. Springer, pp. 233–241.Google Scholar
McSweeney, M. M. (2020). ‘Debunking Logical Ground: Distinguishing Metaphysics from Semantics’. In: Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6.2, pp. 156–170. http://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2019.40.Google Scholar
Mehta, N. (2017). ‘Can Grounding Characterize Fundamentality?’ In: Analysis 77.1, pp. 74–79. http://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx044.Google Scholar
Melnyk, A. (2003). A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. (2011). The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morganti, M. (2015). ‘Dependence, Justification and Explanation: Must Reality Be Well-Founded?’ In: Erkenntnis 80.3, pp. 555–572. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9655-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ney, A. (2020). ‘Are the Questions of Metaphysics More Fundamental Than Those of Science?’ In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100.3, pp. 695–715. http://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12571.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. (2014). ‘Hyperintensional Metaphysics’. In: Philosophical Studies 171.1, pp. 149–160. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0251-2.Google Scholar
North, J. (2013). ‘The Structure of a Quantum World’. In: The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. Ed. Ney, A and Albert, D. Oxford University Press, pp. 184–202.Google Scholar
Norton, J. D. (2014). ‘A Material Dissolution of the Problem of Induction’. In: Synthese 191.4, pp. 1–20. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0356-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, L. A. (2012a). ‘Metaphysics as Modeling: The Handmaiden’s Tale’. In: Philosophical Studies 160.1, pp. 1–29. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9906-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, L. A. (2012b). ‘Building the World from its Fundamental Constituents’. In: Philosophical Studies 158.2, pp. 221–256. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9885-8.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rabin, G. O. (2018). ‘Grounding Orthodoxy and the Layered Conception’. In: Reality and Its Structure. Ed. Bliss, R. L and Priest, G. Oxford University Press, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
Rappoccio, S. (2019). ‘The Experimental Status of Direct Searches for Exotic Physics Beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider’. In: Reviews in Physics 4, p. 100027. issn: 2405-4283.Google Scholar
Raven, M. J. (2015). ‘Ground’. In: Philosophy Compass 10.5, pp. 322–333. http://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12220.Google Scholar
Raven, M. J. (2017). ‘New Work for a Theory of Ground’. In: Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60.6, pp. 625–655. http://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2016.1251333.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1983). ‘The Unpredictability of Future Science’. In: Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis. Ed. Cohen, R and Laudan, L. Reidel, D, pp. 153–168.Google Scholar
Reutlinger, A. and Saatsi, J. (2018). Explanation Beyond Causation: Philosophical Perspectives on Non-Causal Explanations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2005). ‘Why Truthmakers?’ In: Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Ed. Beebee, H and Dodd, J. Oxford University Press, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
Rosen, G. (2010). ‘Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction’. In: Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Ed. Hale, B and Hoffmann, A. Oxford University Press, pp. 109–136.Google Scholar
Saatsi, J. (2017). ‘Explanation and Explanationism in Science and Metaphysics’. In: Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: New Essays. Ed. Slater, M and Yudell, Z. Oxford University Press, pp. 162–191.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2008). ‘Causation and Laws of Nature : Reductionism’. In: Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Ed. Sider, T., Hawthorne, J, and Zimmerman, D. W. Blackwell, pp. 82–107.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2009). ‘On What Grounds What’. In: Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Ed. y D. Manley, D. J. Chalmers, and R. Wasserman. Oxford University Press, pp. 347–383.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2010). ‘Monism: The Priority of the Whole’. In: Philosophical Review 119.1, pp. 31–76. http://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2009-025.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2012). ‘Grounding, Transitivity, and Contrastivity’. In: Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Ed. Correia, F and Schnieder, B. Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–138.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2016). ‘Grounding in the Image of Causation’. In: Philosophical Studies 173.1, pp. 49–100. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0438-1.Google Scholar
Seager, W. (2016). Theories of Consciousness: An Introduction and Assessment. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sider, T. (2013). ‘Symposium on Writing the Book of the World’. In: Analysis 73.4, pp. 751–770. http://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ant085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, T. (2020). ‘Ground Grounded’. In: Philosophical Studies 177.3, pp. 747–767. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1204-6.Google Scholar
Skiles, A. (2015). ‘Against Grounding Necessitarianism’. In: Erkenntnis 80.4, pp. 717–751. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9669-y.Google Scholar
Thompson, N. (2016). ‘Grounding and Metaphysical Explanation’. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116.3, pp. 395–402.Google Scholar
Veltman, M. J. (2003). Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Werner, J. (2020). ‘A Grounding-Based Measure of Relative Fundamentality’. In: Synthese, 198.10, pp. 9721–9737. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02676-2.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, J. (2018). ‘Metaphysical Vertigo’. In: Studies in the Ontology of E. J. Lowe. Ed. Tambassi, T. Editiones Scholasticae, Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Wilsch, T. (2015). ‘The Nomological Account of Ground’. In: Philosophical Studies 172.12, pp. 3293–3312. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0470-9.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. (2018a). ‘Metaphysical Causation’. In: Noûs 52.4, pp. 723–751. http://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12190.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. M. (2014). ‘No Work for a Theory of Grounding’. In: Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57.5–6, pp. 535–579. http://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2014.907542.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. M. (2018b). ‘Grounding-Based Formulations of Physicalism’. In: Topoi 37.3, pp. 495–512. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9435-7.Google Scholar
- 20
- Cited by