Element contents
Series: Elements in Political Economy
The Economic Origin of Political Parties
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2021
Summary
This Element examines how the changing economic basis of parliamentary elections in nineteenth century England and Wales contributed to the development of modern parties and elections. Even after the 1832 Reform Act expanded the British electorate, elections in many constituencies went uncontested, party labels were nominal, and candidates spent large sums treating and bribing voters. By the end of the century, however, almost every constituency was contested, candidates stood as representatives of national parties, and campaigns were fought on the basis of policies. We show how industrialization, the spread of literacy, and the rise of cheap newspapers, encouraged candidates to enter and contest constituencies. The increased expense that came from fighting frequent elections in larger constituencies induced co-partisan candidates to form slates. This imparted a uniform partisan character to parliamentary elections that facilitated the emergence of programmatic political parties.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Political EconomyOnline ISBN: 9781108908726Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 07 January 2021
Bibliography
Adelman, Paul (1989). Peel and the Conservative Party 1830–1850. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydelotte, William O. (1966). “Parties and Issues in Early Victorian England.” Journal of British Studies 5(2): 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braggion, Fabio and Moore, Lyndon (2013). “The Economic Benefits of Political Connections in Late Victorian Britain.” Journal of Economic History 73(1): 142–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Asa (1972). Victorian People: A Reassessment of Persons and Themes 1851–67. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bussell, Jennifer (2018). Costs of Democracy: Political Finance in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Edwin, Dixit, Avinash, and Stokes, Susan (2014). “Catalyst or Cause? Legislation and the Demise of Machine Politics in Britain and the United States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 39(4): 559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, Daniele (2003). “The End of Silent Elections: The Birth of Electoral Competition, 1832–1915.” Party Politics 9(4): 411–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, Daniele (2004). The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Mary E. J. (1976). “The role of Redistribution in the Making of the Third Reform Act.” The Historical Journal 19(September): 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep (2013). “Dynastic parties: Organization, finance and impact.” Party Politics 19(2): 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep and Kollman, Kenneth (2004). The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chilcott, J. V. (1837). An Alphabetical List of the Poll Taken at the General Election of Members to Serve in Parliament for the Borough of Leominster. Leominster, 24 July.Google Scholar
Coates, R. Morris and Dalton, Thomas R. (1992). “Entry Barriers in Politics and Uncontested Elections.” Journal of Political Economy 49(1): 75–90.Google Scholar
Conacher, James B. (1972). The Peelites and the Party System, 1846–52. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael (1997). “Modernization and Thresholds of Democracy: Evidence for a Common Path and Process.” In Midlarsky, Manus I. (Ed.), Inequality, Democracy, and Economic Development. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. (1987). The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, F. W. S. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results, 1832–1880. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice (1962). Political Parties. Barbara North and Robert North (Trans.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eggers, Andrew C. and Spirling, Arthur (2016). “Party Cohesion in Westminster Systems: Inducements, Replacement and Discipline in the House of Commons, 1836–1910.” British Journal of Political Science 46(3): 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, R., Schulz, F, and Vig, V (2014). “The Private Returns to Public Office.” Journal of Political Economy 122(4): 806–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gash, Norman (1953). Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation. Atlantic Highlands: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gash, Norman (1983). “The Organization of the Conservative Party 1832–1846: Part II: The Electoral Organization.” Parliamentary History 2(January): 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gent, David (2012): “The Politics of Disinterest: The Whigs and the Liberal Party in the West Riding of Yorkshire, 1830–1850.” Northern History 49(2): 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowda, M. V. R. and Sridharan, E (2012). “Reforming India’s Party Financing and Election Expenditure Laws.” Election Law Journal 11(2): 226–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Great Britain. General Register Office. (1837). Annual report of the Registrar-General of births, deaths and marriages in England. London: Printed by W. Clowes and Sons for H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Krasno, Jonathan S. (1988). “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 32(4): 884–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurowich, P. M. (1984). “The Continuation of War by Other Means: Party and Politics, 1855–1865.” The Historical Journal 27(3): 603–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwyn, William (1962). Democracy and the Cost of Politics in Britain. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hanham, H. J. (1959). Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone. London and New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen (2009). Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. (1990). “The Effect of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 334–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, Edwin (2004). “Small Town Politics in Mid-Victorian Britain.” History 89(293): 2–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, Edwin (2008). “Managers and Agents: Conservative Party Organisation in the 1850s.” Parliamentary History 27(1): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Christopher (2009). Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Christopher (2017). “The Secret Ballot and the Market for Votes at 19th-Century British Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 50(5): 594–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishlansky, Mark (1986). Parliamentary Selection: Social and Political Choice in Early Modern England. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I. (2007). “Citizen–Politician Linkages: An Introduction.” In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I. (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Didi (2018). Clientelism, Capitalism, and Democracy: The Rise of Programmatic Politics in the United States and Britain. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron (1966). Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Alan J. (1976). The Origins of the Popular Press in England, 1855–1914. London and Basingstoke: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D. (1994). “Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the US House.” Journal of Political Economy 102(4): 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959). “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein (1967). “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Trevor (1965). “Uncontested Seats in British General Elections, 1852–1910.” The Historical Journal 8(2): 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela and Zhu, Boliang (2015). “The Production of Electoral Intimidation: Economic and Political Incentives.” Comparative Politics 48(1): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, Iain (2001) Rational Choice and British Politics: An Analysis of Rhetoric and Manipulation from Peel to Blair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitch, David (1992) The Rise of Popular Literacy in Victorian England: The Influence of Private Choice and Public Policy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. C. (1976). The Politics of Deference: A Study of the Mid-Nineteenth Century English Political System. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Musson, Alfred Edward (1958). “Newspaper Printing in the Industrial Revolution.” The Economic History Review 10(3): 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbould, Ian (1985). “Whiggery and the Growth of Party 1830–41: Organization and the Challenge of Reform.” Political History 4(1): 137–156.Google Scholar
Noble, John Jr. (1859). Poll Book of the Contested Election of the Borough of Boston. April 30.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank (1984). “Electoral Deference in ‘Unreformed’ England: 1760–1832.” Journal of Modern History 56(3): 391–429.Google Scholar
O’Leary, Cornelius (1962). The Elimination of Corrupt Practices in British Elections, 1868–1911. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, Mosei (1902). Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, Volume I (1964 Edition). Garden City: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
Owen, James (2008). “Triangular Contests and Caucus Rhetoric at the 1885 General Elections.” Parliamentary History 27(2): 215–235.Google Scholar
Philbin, J. Holladay (1965). Parliamentary Representation, 1832 England and Wales. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, John A. (1992). The Great Reform Bill in the Boroughs: English Electoral Behaviour, 1818–1841. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, John A. and Wetherell, Charles (1995). “The Great Reform Bill of 1832 and the Political Modernization of England.” American Historical Review 100(2): 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Dushinsky, Michael (1981). British Political Finance. Washington, DC and London: American Enterprise Institution for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard (1999). “Elections and Representation.” In Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C, and Manin, Bernard (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R., Leonardi, D. R., and Nanetti, R. Y. (1994) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rix, Kathryn (2016). Parties, Agents, and Electoral Culture in England, 1880–1910. Rochester: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, William D. (1981). Men of Property: The Very Wealthy in Britain since the Industrial Revolution. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, William D. (1983). “The End of ‘Old Corruption’ in Britain 1780–1860.” Past & Present 10(1): 55–86.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., and Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Philip J. (2002). Electoral Reform at Work: Local Politics and National Parties, 1832–1841. Woodbridge and Rochester: Boydell Press for the Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. (2006). “The Nineteenth-century Origins of Modern Political Parties: The Unwanted Emergence of Party-based Politics.” In Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William J. (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. (1984). “On the Theory of Party Organization.” The Journal of Politics 46(2): 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, R. (2009). “India’s 2009 Elections: The Problem of Corruption.” Journal of Democracy 20(4): 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, Charles (1915). Electoral Reform in England and Wales: The Development and Operation of the Parliamentary Franchise, 1832–1885. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Miles (1997). “Informational Inequality and Democracy in the New World Order.” In Midlarsky, Manus I. (Ed.), Inequality, Democracy, and Economic Development. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Lawrence (1969). “Literacy and Education in England 1640–1900.” Past & Present 42(1): 69–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein and Shugart, Matthew Soberg (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Teorell, Jan (2010). Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alun J. (1950). “The System of Registration and the Development of Party Organisation, 1832–1870.” History 35(123–124): 81–98.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (2000) Democracy in America, Volumes I and II (1935 Edition) Henry Reeve (Trans.). New York: Bantam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaishnav, Milan (2012). The Merits of Money and “Muscle”: Essays on Criminality, Elections and Democracy in India. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu (2004). Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. R. (1966). The Formation of the British Liberal Party. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Weedon, Alexis (2003). Victorian Publishing: The Economics of Book Production for a Mass Market. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Weschle, S. (2016). “Punishing Personal and Electoral Corruption: Experimental Evidence from India”, Research & Politics 3(2): https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016645136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Steven I. (2007). “Explaining Changing Patterns of Voter–Party Linkages in India.” In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I. (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel (2017). Conservative Political Parties and the Birth of Modern Democracy in Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7
- Cited by