Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T17:16:24.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Writing in the Ancient World

Cypro-Minoan and Its Writers

At Home and Overseas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2024

Cassandra M. Donnelly
Cassandra M. Donnelly
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus

Summary

Poised as middlemen between the Ancient Near East and the Aegean, writers of Cypro-Minoan, the undeciphered Late Bronze Age script of Cyprus, borrowed and transformed writing practices from their neighbors and invented new ones. Bits and pieces of the script are found throughout the Mediterranean, but there are few clay tablets, characteristic of neighboring scribal-based, administrative writing traditions. Instead, Cypro-Minoan writers wrote on mercantile objects, outside of scribal schools. As the administrative centers of the eastern Mediterranean collapsed c. 1177 BCE administrative writing systems went with them. Cypro-Minoan remained in use, presaging the spread of the Phoenician alphabet. This Element explores the role of writing and trade during the collapse period and introduces readers to the Cypro-Minoan script, its history, and approaches to its decipherment, showing that writers of an undeciphered script can still communicate when we take the care to look for them.
Get access

Keywords

Cypro-MinoanBronze Age collapsetradehistory of writing and deciphermentCyprus
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Writing in the Ancient World
Online ISBN: 9781009381840
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 02 January 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aruz, J. (2013). Seals and the Imagery of Interaction. In Aruz, J., Graff, S. B., and Rakic, Y., eds., Cultures in Contact: From Mesopotamia to the Mediterranean in the Second Millenium BC. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, pp. 216–225.Google Scholar
Baroni, A. (2011). Alphabetic vs. Non-Alphabetic Writing: Linguistic Fit and Natural Tendencies. Rivista Di Linguistica 23(2), 127–159.Google Scholar
Berger, D., Soles, J. S., Giumlia-Mair, A. R., Brüggman, G., Galili, E., Lockhoff, N., Pernicka, E. (2019). Isotope Systematics and Chemical Composition of Tin Ingots from Mochlose (Crete) and Other Late Bronze Age Sites in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea: An Ultimate Key to Tin Provenance? PLoS ONE 14(6): https://doi.org/10/371/journal.pone.0218326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, N., Donnelly, C. M., and Hirschfeld, N. (forthcoming). The Inscribed Tools from the Cape Gelidonya Shipwreck. In Festschrift in Honour of Thomas G. Palaima. Philadelphia: INSTAP Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bounia, A., Nikolaou, P., and Stylianou-Lambert, T. (2021). Contested Perceptions of Archaeological Sites in Cyprus: Communities and Their Claims on Their Past. In Solomon, E., eds., Contested Antiquity: Archaeological Heritage and Social Conflict in Modern Greece and Cyprus, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 108–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourogiannis, G. (2018). The Phoenician Presence in the Aegean during the Early Iron Age: Trade, Settlement, and Cultural Interaction. Rivista di Studi Fenici 46, 43–88.Google Scholar
Boyes, P. J. (2021). Script and Society: The Social Context and Writing Practices in Late Bronze Age Ugarit. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammarosano, M., Weirauch, Maruhn, F., K., Jendritzki, G., and Kohl, P. (2019). They Wrote on Wax: Wax Boards in the Ancient Near East. Mesopotamia 54, 121–180.Google Scholar
Cline, E. H. (2021). 1177 BC: The Year Civilization Collapsed. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corazza, M., Tamburini, F., Valério, M., and Ferrara, S. (2022). Unsupervised Deep Learning Support Reclassification of Bronze Age Cypriot Writing System. PLoS ONE 17(7), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniel, J. F. (1941). Prolegomena to the Cypro-Minoan Script. American Journal of Archaeology 45(2), 249–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikaios, P. (1953). An Inscribed Tablet from Enkomi, Cyprus. Antiquity 27, 103–105.Google Scholar
Dikaios, P. (1956). The Context of the Enkomi Tablets. Kadmos 2(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
Donald, A. T. (2016). Cylinder Seals in Context: An Analysis of Late Cypriot Glyptic. Dissertation. La Trobe University.Google Scholar
Donnelly, C. M. (2022a). Cypro-Minoan and Its Potmarks and Vessel Inscriptions as Challenges to Aegean Scripts Corpora. In Steele, P. M. and Boyes, P. J., eds., Writing around the Ancient Mediterranean: Practices and Adaptations. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, C. M. (2022b). Cypro-Minoan Abroad, Cypriots Abroad? Athens University Review of Archaeology 9, 195–206.Google Scholar
Donnelly, C. M. (forthcoming). Cycladic Linear A and Connections between Scripts. In Salgarella, E. and Petrakis, V., eds., The Wor(l)ds of Linear A: Integrated Approaches to Documents and Inscriptions of a Cretan Bronze Age Script. Athens: National and Kapodostrian University of Athens.Google Scholar
Duhoux, Y. (2012). The Most Ancient Text Written in Greek: The Opheltas’ Spit. Kadmos 51, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, L. (1989). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science, Part I. Archivaria 28, 7–27.Google Scholar
Egetmeyer, M. (2010). The Recent Debate on the Eteocypriot People and Language. Pasiphae 3, 69–90.Google Scholar
Egetmeyer, M. (2016). Appendix V: A Bronze Bowl from Palaepaphos-Skales with a New Cypro-Minoan Inscription from the Cypro-Geometric Period. In Karageorghis, V. and Raptou, E., eds., Palaepaphos-Skales: Tombs of the Late Cypriote IIIB and Cypro-Geometric Periods (Excavations of 2008 and 2011). Nicosia: The Cyprus Institute, pp. 131–136.Google Scholar
Evans, A. J. (1909). Scripta Minoa: The Written Documents of Minoan Crete 1. The Hieroglyphic and Primitive Linear Classes. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. H. (2014). Communities of Style: Portable Luxury Arts, Identity, and Collective Memory in the Iron Age Levant. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, S. (2012). Cypro-Minoan Inscriptions. Volume 1: Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, S. (2013). Cypro-Minoan Inscriptions. Volume 2: The Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, S. and Bell, C. (2016). Tracing Copper in the Cypro-Minoan Script. Antiquity 90(352), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, S. and Tamburini, F. (2022). Advanced Techniques for the Decipherment of Ancient Scripts. Lingue e Linguaggio 2(July–December), 239–259.Google Scholar
Ferrara, S. and Valério, M. (2017). Contexts and Repetitions of Cypro-Minoan Inscriptions: Function and Subject Matter of Clay Balls. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 378, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. (2013). The Riddle of the Labyrinth: The Quest to Crack an Ancient Code. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
Galili, E., Gale, N., and Rosen, B. (2013). A Late Bronze Age Shipwreck with a Metal Cargo from Hishuley Carmel, Israel. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 42, 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giumlia-Mair, A., Kassianidou, V., and Papasavvas, G. (2011). Miniature Ingots from Cyprus. In Betancourt, P. P. and Ferrence, S., eds., Metallurgy: Understanding How, Learning Why. Studies in Honor of James D. Muhly. Philadelphia: INSTAP Academic Press, pp. 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Given, M. (1998). Inventing the Eteocypriots: Imperialist Archaeology and the Manipulation of Ethnic Identity. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 11(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godart, L. and Olivier, J.-P. (1976). Recueil des inscriptions en Linéaire A. Volumes 1–5. Paris: P. Guenther.Google Scholar
Godart, L. and Olivier, J.-P. (1996). Corpus Hieroglyphicarum Inscriptionum Cretae. Paris: Onassaglou.Google Scholar
Goren, Y., Finkelstein, I., and Na’aman, N. (2004). Inscribed in Clay: Provenance Study of the Amarna Tablets and Other Ancient Near Eastern Texts. Tel Aviv: Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. (1993). A Bowl Epigraph of the Official Taprammi. In Mellink, M. J., ed., Aspects of Art and Iconography: Anatolia and Its Neighbors. Studies in Honor of Nimet Özguç = Nimet Özgüç’e Armağan. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi, pp. 715–717.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., ed. (2024). Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Volume III: Inscriptions of the Hittite Empire and New Inscriptions of the Iron Age. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, N. (1999). Potmarks of the Late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean. Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, N. (2002). Marks on Pots: Patterns of Use in the Archaeological Record at Enkomi. In Smith, J. S., ed., Script and Seal Use on Cyprus in the Bronze and Iron Ages. Boston: Archaeological Institute of America, pp. 49–109.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, N. (2004). Eastward via Cyprus? The Marked Mycenaean Pottery of Enkomi, Ugarit and Tell Abu Hawam. In Balensi, J., Monchambert, J.-Y., Celka, S. Müller, eds., La Céramique mycénienne de l’Égée au Levant: Hommage à Vronwy Hankey. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Mediterranée-Jean Pouilloux, pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, N. (2008). How and Why Potmarks Matter. Near Eastern Archaeology 71, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, N. (2019). Cape Gelidonya Shipwreck Excavation. In Smith, C., ed., Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1.Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. L. (1997). Imports and Immigrants: Near Eastern Contacts with Iron Age Crete. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, T. (2022). Power and Diplomacy in the Amarna Letters: Cypro-Egyptian Relations in the Mid-Fourteenth Century BCE. In Furlan, U., Husøy, T. A., and Bohun, H., eds., Narratives of Power in the Ancient World. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2020). Eteocypriot in the Bronze Age? The Cypro-Minoan Cylinder from Enkomi as an Accounting Document. Kadmos 59(1–2), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. (1997). The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karageorghis, V., and Masson, É. (1971). Un bronze votif inscrit (modèle de foie ou de rein?) Trouvé á Kition en 1970. Studi Ciprioti e Rapporti di Scavo 1, 237–246.Google Scholar
Knapp, A. B. (2008). Prehistoric and Protohistoric Cyprus: Identity, Insularity, and Connectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, B. A. and Meyer, N. (2023). Merchants and Mercantile Society on Late Bronze Age Cyprus. American Journal of Archaeology 127(3), 309–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markides, M. 1916. Annual Report of the Curator of Antiquities 1914. Annual Report of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus, 5–6.Google Scholar
Masson, É. (1971). Étude de vingt-six boules d’argile inscrites trouvées à Enkomi et Hala Sultan Tekke (Chypre). Gothenburg: Paul Åströms Förlag.Google Scholar
Masson, É. (1974). Cyprominoica: Répertoires; documents de Ras Shamra: essais d’interprétation. Gothenburg: Åströms Förlag.Google Scholar
Master, D. M. (2021). Cypro-Minoan Handles. In, L. E. Stager, Master, D. M., and Aja, A. J., eds., Ashkelon 7: The Iron Age I. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns, pp. 679–697.Google Scholar
Matthäus, H. (1985). Metallgefäße und Gefäßuntersätze der Bronzezeit, der geometrischen und archaischen Periode auf Cypern: mit einem Anhang der bronzezeitlichen Schwertfunde auf Cypern. Munich: C.H. Beck Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
McCarter, K. P. (2021). A Twelfth-Century Seal with Three Signs. In Stager, L. E., Master, D. M., and Aja, A. J., eds., Ashkelon 7: The Iron Age I. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns, pp. 669–678.Google Scholar
McGeough, K. (2015). “What Is Not in My House You Must Give Me”: Agents of Exchange according to the Textual Evidence from Ugarit. In Eder, B. and Pruzsinszky, R., eds., Policies of Exchange: Political Systems and Modes of Interaction in the Aegean and the Near East in the 2nd Millennium: B.C.E. Vienna: Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Meneghetti, F. (2022). Miniature Oxhide Ingots from Late Bronze Age Cyprus: An Update on the Material. Frankfurt: Frankfurter Archäologie.Google Scholar
Monroe, C. M. (2009). Scales of Fate: Trade, Tradition, and Transformation in the Eastern Mediterranean ca. 1350–1175 BCE. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Moran, W. L. (2000). The Amarna Letters. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Muti, G. (2024). Discoid Loomweights on Cyprus: New Insights on the Adoption of Practice-related Knowledge from the Aegean. Levant 56(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00758914.2023.2297530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahm, W. (1981). Studien zur Kypro-Minoischen Schrift. Kadmos 20, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikoloudis, S. (2010). Multiculturalism in the Mycenaen World. In Collins, B. J., Bachvarova, M. R., Rutherford, I., eds., Anatolian Interfaces: Hittites, Greeks and Their Neighbours. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
Olivier, J.-P. (2007). Édition holistique des textes chypro-minoens. Rome: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Papasavvas, G. (2023). Trench Warfare at Enkomi: Personalities, Politics and Science in Cypriot Archaeology. Nicosia: Astrom Editions.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R. (1999). Cracking Codes: The Rosetta Stone and Decipherment. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Peltenburg, E., and Iacovou, M. (2012). Crete and Cyprus: Contrasting Political Configurations. British School at Athens Studies 20, 345–363.Google Scholar
Persson, A. W. (1937). More Cypro-Minoan Inscriptions. In Gjerstad, E. and Westholm, A., eds., The Swedish Cyprus Expedition: Finds and Results of the Excavations in Cyprus, 1927–1931, Vol. 3. Stockholm: Victor Pettersons Bokindustriaktiebolag, pp. 601–618.Google Scholar
Pilides, D. (2018). Menelaos Markides, the First Curator of the Cyprus Museum. In Webb, J. M., ed., Lapithos Vrysi Tou Barba, Cyprus: Early and Middle Late Bronze Age Tombs Excavated by Menelaos Markides. Nicosia: Astrom Editions, pp. 8–16.Google Scholar
Polig, M. (2022). 3D Approaches to Cypro-Minoan Writing: Advanced 3D Methods of Documentation, Visualization and Analysis. Dissertation. The Cyprus Institute and Ghent University.Google Scholar
Polig, M., and Donnelly, C. M. (2022). Between Frustration and Progression: An Integrated Cypro-Minoan Signary and Its Paleographic Diversity. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Antoloci Nuova Serie 8, 41–62.Google Scholar
Pulak, C. M., and Matheny, R. (2021). The Canaanite Pottery Assemblage from the Late Bronze Age Uluburun Shipwreck. TINA Maritime Archaeology Periodical 15, 16–61.Google Scholar
Radner, K. (2011). Schreiberkonventionen im Assyrischen Reich Sprachen und Schriftsysteme. In Renger, J., ed., Assur- Gott, Stadt Und Land. 5. Internationales Colloquium der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 18.–21. Februar 2004 in Berlin. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 385–403.Google Scholar
Rollston, C. A. (2010). Writing and Literacy in the World of Ancient Israel: Epigraphic Evidence from the Iron Age. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Routledge, B., and McGeough, K. M. (2009). Just What Collapsed? A Network Perspective on “Palatial” and “Private” Trade in Ugarit. In Bachhuber, C. and Roberts, R. G., eds., Forces of Transformation: The End of the Bronze Age in the Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 22–29.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Salomon, C. (2021). Comparative Perspectives on the Study of Script Transfer, and the Origin of the Runic Script. In Haralambous, Y., ed., Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century-2020: Part I. Paris: Fluxus Editions, pp. 143–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scancarelli, J. (1996). Cherokee Writing. In Daniels, P. T. and Bright, W., eds., The World’s Writing Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 587–592.Google Scholar
Sherratt, S. (2003). Visible Writing: Questions of Script and Identity in Early Iron Age Greece and Cyprus. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 22(3), 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, S. (2013). Late Cypriot Writing in Context. In Steele, P. M., ed., Syllabic Writing on Cyprus and Its Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Z. (2018). The Recipient of the Bronze Bowl from Kınık. Ash-Sharq 2(1), 121–124.Google Scholar
Singer, I. (1999). A Political History of Ugarit. In Watson, N. G. E. and Wyatt, N., eds., Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Leiden: Brill, pp. 603–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, C., Selvig, L., Chen, D., Srivatsan, N., and Berg-Kirkpatrick, T. (2022). Cypro-Minoan: One Language or Three? An Exercise in Phonology-Based Statistical Analysis. Lingue e Linguaggio 2(July–December), 295–309.Google Scholar
Smith, J. S. (2002). Problems and Prospects in the Study of Script and Seal Use on Cyprus in the Bronze and Iron Ages. In Smith, J. S., ed., Script and Seal Use on Cyprus in the Bronze and Iron Ages. Boston: Archaeological Institute of America, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Smith, J. S. (2003). Writing Styles in Clay of the Eastern Mediterranean Late Bronze Age. In Stampolides, N. C. and Karageorghis, V., eds., ΠΛΟΕΣ … Sea Routes … Interconnections in the Mediterranean, 16th–6th c. BC: Proceedings of the International Symposium Held at Rethymnon, Crete, September 29th–October 2nd 2002. Athens: University of Crete and the A.G. Leventis Foundation, pp. 277–291.Google Scholar
Smith, J. S. (2012). Seals, Scripts, and Politics at Late Bronze Age Kourion. American Journal of Archaeology 116(1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. S. (2016). A Wall Bracket Fragment with Cypro-Minoan Sign from Kalavasos-Kaparovouno. The Vasilikos Valley Project 10, 335–336.Google Scholar
Smith, J. S., and Hirschfeld, N. (1999). The Cypro-Minoan Corpus Project Takes an Archaeological Approach. Near Eastern Archaeology 62(2), 129–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, P. M. (2014). The Mystery of Ancient Cypriot Clay Balls. British Academy Review 24, 60–63.Google Scholar
Steele, P. M. (2017). Understanding Relations between Scripts: The Aegean Writing Systems. Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, P. M. (2019). Writing and Society in Ancient Cyprus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stroebel, W. C. (2017). Fluid Books, Fluid Borders: Modern Greek and Turkish Book Networks in a Shifting Sea. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Taggar-Cohen, A. (2002). The Casting of Lots among the Hittites in Light of the Ancient Near Eastern Parallels. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Studies 29, 97–103.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. E. (2015). Wedge Order in Cuneiform: A Preliminary Survey. In Devecchi, E., Müller, G. G. W., and Mynářová, J., eds., Current Research in Cuneiform Palaeography: Proceedings of the Workshop Organised and the 60th Rencontre Assyriologique International Warsaw 2014. Gladbeck: PeWe-Verlag, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Valério, M. (2018). Cypro-Minoan: An Aegean-Derived Syllabary on Cyprus (and Elsewhere). In Ferrara, S. and Valério, M., eds., Paths into Script Formation in the Ancient Mediterranean, Rome: Edizioni Quasar, pp. 103–128.Google Scholar
Valério, M. (2016). Investigating the Signs and Sounds of Cypro-Minoan. Dissertation, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Valério, M., and Davis, B. (2017). Cypro-Minoan in Marking Systems of the Eastern Mediterranean and Central Mediterranean: New Methods of Investigating Old Questions. In Jasink, A. M., Weingarten, J., and Ferrara, S., eds., Non-Scribal Communication Media in the Bronze Age Aegean and Surrounding Areas: The Semantics of A-Literate and Proto-Literate Media. Florence: Firenze University Press, pp. 131–152.Google Scholar
Van Soldt, W. H. (1991). Studies in the Akkadian of Ugarit: Dating and Grammar. Kevelaer: Butzon & Bercker.Google Scholar
Vidal, J. (2014). Arthur Evans and the Assyriologists. In Fenollós, J.-L. Montero, ed., Redonner vie aux Mésopotamiens: Mélanges offerts à Jean-Claude Margueron à l’occasion de son 80e anniversaire. A Coruña: Ferrol, pp. 141–148.Google Scholar
Vlachek, J. (1973). Written Language: General Problems and Problems of English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, J. M. (2022). Cyprus’s Maritime Connectivity before and after and during the Transition to the Late Bronze Age. In Bourogiannis, G., ed. Beyond Cyprus: Investigating Cypriot Connectivity in the Mediterranean from the Late Bronze Age to the End of the Classical Period, Athens: Athens University Review of Archaeology, pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
Yahalom-Mack, N., Finn, D. M., Erel, Y., Tirosh, O., Galili, E., and Yasur-Landau, A. (2022). Incised Late Bronze Age Lead Ingots from the Southern Anchorage of Caesarea. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports Reports 41, 1–10.Google Scholar
Yasur-Landau, A. (2010). The Philistines and Aegean Migration at the End of the Late Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasur-Landau, A. (2017). Non-Scribal Communication in the Southern Levant during the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. In Jasink, A. M., Weingarten, J., and Ferrara, S., eds., Non-Scribal Communication Media in the Bronze Age Aegean and Surrounding Areas: The Semantics of A-Literate and Proto-Literate Media (Seals, Potmarks, Mason’s Marks, Seal-Impressed Pottery, Ideograms and Logograms, and Related Systems). Florence: Firenze University Press, pp. 207–220.Google Scholar
Yon, M. (2004). Inscription cunéiforme alphabétique (No. 7001). In Calvet, Y., Salles, J.-F., Yon, M., Caubet, A, and Fourrier, S., eds., Kition dans les textes: Testimonia littéraires et épigraphiques et corpus des inscriptions. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les civilisations, pp. 365–366.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cypro-Minoan and Its Writers
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Cypro-Minoan and Its Writers
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Cypro-Minoan and Its Writers
Available formats
×