Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:58:28.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Generative Syntax

Coordinate Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2023

Ning Zhang
Ning Zhang
Affiliation:
National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan

Summary

In a coordination construction, which is universally available, two or more syntactic constituents are combined, with or without an overt coordinator. This Element examines how coordinate structures are derived syntactically, focussing on the syntactic operations involved, including constraints on both their operations and the representations they produce. Specifically, considering the recent research development in the syntax of coordination, the Element discusses whether any special syntactic operation is required to derive various coordinate constructions, including constructions in which each conjunct has a gap, whether there is any special functional category heading coordinate constructions in general, what the morphosyntactic statuses of coordinators (i.e., conjunctions and disjunctions) are in some specific languages, whether the structure of a coordinate construction can be beyond the binary complementation structure, and whether the mobility of conjuncts and the mobility of elements in conjuncts require any construction-specific constraint on syntactic operations.
Get access

Keywords

coordinateJmodificationlinkercategory
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Generative Syntax
Online ISBN: 9781009326643
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 14 December 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Barbara. 1976. Right node raising as a test for constituenthood. Linguistic Inquiry 7.4: 639–642.Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Agbayani, Brian, Golston, Chris, and Dasha, Henderer. 2011. Prosodic movement. In Washburn, Mary Byram, McKinney-Bock, Katherine, Varis, Erika, Sawyer, Ann, and Tomaszewicz, Barbara (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Conference on Formal Linguistics, 231–239. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Aldridge, Edith. 2017. Internally and externally headed relative clauses in Tagalog. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2.1: 41. 1–33, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altshuler, Daniel and Truswell, Robert. 2022. Coordination and the syntax–discourse interface. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1992. Unmatched chains and the representation of plural pronouns. Natural Language Semantics 1: 33–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltin, Mark. 2006. Extraposition. In Everaert, M. and van Riemsdijk, H. (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax. 237–271. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Alessandra, and Mauri, Caterina. 2022. Non-exhaustive connectives. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 75.2: 317–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Blümel, Andreas. 2017. Symmetry, shared labels and movement in syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blümel, Rudolf. 1914. Einführung in die Syntax. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2017. Adjectival hydras: Restrictive modifiers above DP? In Mayr, Clemens and Williams, Edwin (eds.), Wiener Linguistische Gazette (WLG) 82: 13–22.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. 1994. In defense of coordinate structures. Linguistic Analysis 24: 218–246.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. 2005. Against ConjP. Lingua 115.4: 461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2020a. On the coordinate structure constraint and the adjunct condition. In Bárány, András, Biberauer, Theresa, Douglas, Jamie and Vikner, Sten (eds.), Syntactic architecture and its consequences II: Between syntax and morphology, 227–258. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2020b. On the coordinate structure constraint, across-the-board-movement, phases, and labeling. In Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van, Pots, Cora, and Temmerman, Tanja (eds.), Recent Developments in Phase Theory. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 133–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2022a. On the limit of across-the-board movement: Distributed extraction coordination. Philosophies, 7.10. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7010010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2022b. Wh&wh coordinations. lingbuzz/006842.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan and Thráinsson, Höskuldur 1990. A note on Icelandic coordination. In Mailing, Joan and Zaenen, Annie (eds.), Syntax and semantics 24: Modern Icelandic syntax, 355–365. San Diego: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, E. Wayles III. 1972. Conjoined question words and a limitation of English surface structures. Linguistic Inquiry 3.2: 223–226.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Precede-and-command revisited. Language 90.2: 342–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2022. Selectional violation in coordination (a response to Patejuk and Przepiórkowski to appear). Linguistic Inquiry, to appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin and Al Khalaf, Eman. 2020. Category mismatches in coordination revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 51.1: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel and Hartmann, Katharina. 2015. Semantic coordination without syntactic coordinators. In Toivonen, Ida, Csúri, Piroska, and Van Der Zee, Emile (eds.), Structures in the mind: Essays on language, music, and cognition in honor of Ray Jackendoff, 41–61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Greg. 1983. Marking constituents. In Heny, Frank and Richards, Barry (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles. Vol. I: Categories. 49–68. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg. 1987. Same and different: Some consequences for syntax and semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 531–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Greg. 2000. “Mismatches” of form and interpretation. University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, Spring, no. 1: 97–106.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo and Donati, Caterina. 2015. (Re)labeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. 2012. Conjunction, cumulation and respectively readings. Journal of Linguistics 48.2: 297–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. 2014. On the disunity of right-node raising phenomena: Extraposition, ellipsis, and deletion. Language 90.4: 834–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. 2021. Island phenomena and related matters. In Müller, Stefan, Abeillé, Anne, Borsley, Robert D. and Koenig, Jean- Pierre (eds.), Head-driven phrase structure grammar: The handbook, 665–723. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–67.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2019. UCLA Lectures. Invited lectures at the Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, April 29–30, May 1–2, 2019. Manuscript available with some changes and an introduction by Robert Freidin. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005485.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2021. Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu 160: 1–40.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2022. Genuine explanation. Manuscript, University of Arizona and MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Miller, George. 1963. Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R., and Galanter, E. (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 2, 269–322. Wiley.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1991. Functional heads and proper government in Chamorro. Lingua 85: 85–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2019. A note on relative clauses with split antecedents. In Bağrıaçık, Metin, Breitbarth, Anne, and Clercq, Karen De (eds.) Mapping linguistic data: Essays in honour of Liliane Haegeman, 75–81. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8625919/file/8625920#page=75.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara and Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina. 2013. Towards a new typology of coordinated wh-questions. Journal of Linguistics 49: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, Barbara and Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina. 2020. Conjunction saves multiple sluicing: How*(and) why? Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5.1: 92. 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris. 1997. Local economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2022. The complexity of trees, universal grammar and economy conditions. Biolinguistics, 16.e9573, https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.9573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28.2: 195–217.Google Scholar
Davies, William. 2000. Events in Madurese reciprocals. Oceanic Linguistics 39.1: 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 2005. Grammar at the borderline: A case study of P as a lexical category. In Alderete, John et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 1–18. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1968. Coordination: Its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1983. Two constraints on relators and what they can do for us. In Dik, Simon (ed.), Advances in functional grammar, 267–298. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2018. Dependency and directionality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Ray C. 1970. A grammar of coordinate conjoined structures: I. Language 46.4: 850–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David and Noyer, Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32.4: 555–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David and Noyer, Rolf. 2012. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Ramchand, Gillian and Reiss, Charles (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 2001. Counterfactuals in a dynamic context. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 123–152. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny and Johnson, Kyle. 2016. QR is restrictor sharing. Proceedings of the 33rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 1–16. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Franco, Ludovico and Manzini, Rita. 2017. Instrumental prepositions and case: Contexts of occurrence and alternations with datives. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2.1: 8. 1–37, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1992. A prominence constraint on null operator constructions. Lingua 88: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 2020. Adventures in English syntax. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawron, Jean Mark and Kehler, Andrew. 2004. The semantics of respective readings, conjunction, and filler-gap dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 169–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–183.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit and Castroviejo, Elena. 2015. Manner and degree: An introduction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33.3: 745–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Leland. 1980. Analogical generalization in natural language syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Georgi, Doreen and Amaechi, Mary. 2020. Resumption and islandhood in Igbo. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 261–274. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila. 1965. Coordinating conjunctions in English. Language 41.2: 260–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, Grant. 1987. Parallel structures in syntax: Coordination, causatives and restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander. 1973. On the nonunitary nature of the coordinate structure constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 4.1: 88–92.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander. 1985. Subcategorization and parallelism. Theoretical Linguistics 12.2: 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosu, Alexander. 1987. On acceptable violations of parallelism constraints. In Dirven, R. and Fried, V. (eds.), Functionalism in linguistics, 425–457. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2022. Typology of adverbial clauses. Handout given at the workshop Typology of Adverbial Clauses and the Role of Discourse Syntax, Cologne, May 20–21.Google Scholar
Haida, Andreas and Repp, Sophie. 2012. Locality restrictions on sideward movement. Manuscript. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001666.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 3–40. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene and Angelika, Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Petra. 2004. Either, both and neither in coordinate structures. In Meulen, Alice ter and Abraham, Werner (eds.), The composition of meaning: From lexeme to discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline and Zamparelli, Roberto. 2003. Coordinated bare definites. Linguistic Inquiry 34.3: 443–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles Francis. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: The Macmillan Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 2000. Negative polarity items: Triggering, scope, and c-command. In Horn, Laurence R. and Kato, Yasuhiko (eds.), Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, 115–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert and Nunes., Jairo 2002. On asymmetries between parasitic gap and Across-The-Board constructions. Syntax 5.1: 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C-T. James. 1984. Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 19.2: 53–78.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren. 1989. Mandarin Chinese NP de – a comparative study of current grammatical theories. Nankang, Taipei.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey, Pullum. 2006. Coordination and subordination. In Aarts, B. and McMahon, A. (eds.), A handbook of English linguistics, 198–219. Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2018. Gapping and stripping. In van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen and Temmerman, Tanja (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 562–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2022. Antisymmetry and externalization. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 43.1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin. 2002. On coordination of wh-phrases in Russian. Manuscript, Tübingen University and Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Keshet, Ezra and David, J. Medeiros. 2019. Imperatives under coordination. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37.3: 869–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1978. Why subject sentences don’t exist. In Keyser, S. J. (ed.), Recent transformational studies in European languages, 53–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kučerová, Ivona and Munn, Alan. 2023. Beyond ϕ-features: Are we there yet? Agree reconsidered. Paper presented at WECCFL-41.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1986. Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint. In Farley, Anne M., Farley, Peter T., and McCullough, Karl-Erik (eds.), Papers from the Chicago linguistic society 22, Part 2, 152–167.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Peters, Stanley. 1969. Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates. In David, A. Reibel and Schane, Sanford A. (eds.), Modern studies in English, 113–142. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1969. On pronominalization and the chain of command. In Reibel, D. A., Schane, S. A., Chomsky, N., and Lakoff, G. (eds.), Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 2018. AP-de (地) adverbs in Mandarin. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39.1: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard and Yamakido, Hiroko. 2008. Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In McNally, L. and Kennedy, C. (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, 43–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei. 2022. Universal grammar and iconicity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 2008. Phrase structure and categorial labelling: de as a head? Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 10.2: 97–108.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje. 2014. Sentential subjects: Topics or real subjects. Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 31), 315–324. Cascadilla, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania. Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2: 201–225.Google Scholar
McCawley, James. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13.1: 91–106.Google Scholar
McInnerney, Andrew and Sugimoto, Yushi. 2022. On dissociating adjunct island and subject island effects. Proceedings of Linguistic Society of America 7.1: 5207. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v7i1.5207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney-Bock, Katherine. 2013. Deriving split-antecedent relative clauses. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19.1(14): 113–122.Google Scholar
McNally, Louise 1992. VP-coordination and the VP-internal subject hypothesis. Linguistic Lnquiry 23.2: 336–341.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor Aleksandrovic. 1988. Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. Albany, NY: The SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Mitrović, Moreno. 2014. Morphosyntactic atoms of propositional logic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 2005. Do states have Davidsonian arguments? Some empirical considerations. In Maienborn, C. and Wöllstein, A. (eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications: 69–88. Tübingen: Max Niemyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 1992. Coordination and comparatives. Doctoral dissertation, MIT (e-version).Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 2004. The semantics of together. Natural Language Semantics 12.4: 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouret, François. 2004. The syntax of French conjunction doubling. Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 40.2: 193–207.Google Scholar
Muadz, Husni. 1991. Coordinate structure: A planar representation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan 1987. Coordinate structure and X-bar theory. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 4.1: 121–140.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan. 1992. A null operator analysis of ATB gaps. The Linguistic Review 9: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, Alan. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan. 1999. On the identity requirement of ATB extraction, Natural Language Semantics 7.4: 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, Alan. 2000. Three types of coordination asymmetries. In Schwabe, Kerstin and Zhang, Ning (eds.), Ellipsis in conjunction, 1–22. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, Philip, Joy, Tanaka, Misako, and van de Koot, Hans. 2023. Subordination and binary branching. Syntax 26.1: 41–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62.1: 56–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 303–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oda, Hiromune. 2017. Two types of the coordinate structure constraint and rescue by PF deletion. In Lamont, Andrew and Tetzloff, Katerina (eds.), Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 343–356. Amherst, University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
Oda, Hiromune. 2021. Decomposing and deducing the coordinate structure constraint. The Linguistic Review 38.4: 605–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özay-Demircioğlu, Ayşe Gül. 2021. Processing of Comitative Constructions in Turkish. Manuscript. TED University.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos and Nóbrega, Vitor. 2023. Why we need roots in Minimalism. To appear in 2024 in Cambridge Handbook of Minimalism. lingbuzz/006497Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Patejuk, Agnieszka, and Przepiórkowski, Adam. 2023. Category mismatches in coordination vindicated. Linguistic Inquiry 54.2: 326–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John. 1985. Complex phrases and complex sentences. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description II, 3–41, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M., and Ross, John Robert. 1970. Relative clauses with split antecedents. Linguistic Inquiry 1.3: 350–350.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1991. Zero Syntax. vol. 2: Infinitives. Material intended for “Zero Syntax” but not included in the final publication. Available at http://lingphil.mit.edu/papers/pesetsk/infins.pdf, accessible on August 11, 2022.Google Scholar
Peterson, Peter G. 2004. Coordination: Consequences of a lexical–functional account. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 643–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petzell, Erik M. 2017. Head conjuncts: Evidence from Old Swedish. Linguistic Inquiry 48.1: 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, J. Naomi. 2012. Subordinating and coordinating linkers. Doctoral dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Pietraszko, Asia. 2019. Obligatory CP nominalization in Ndebele. Syntax 22.1: 66–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul Martin. 1998. Three investigations of extraction. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prażmowska, Anna. 2013. Polish coordination as adjunction. In Proceedings of the Second Central European Conference in Linguistics for Postgraduate Students, 203–218.Google Scholar
Privoznov, Dmitry. 2021. A theory of two strong islands. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. Structure for coordination. Glot international 3.7: 3–6.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1999. Events and economy of coordination. Syntax 2.2: 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 2002. Correlative conjunctions and events: A reply to a reply. Syntax 5.3: 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam. 2022a. Coordination of unlike grammatical cases. Language 98.3: 592–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam. 2022b. Polyadic cover quantification in heterofunctional coordination. In Gutzmann, Daniel and Repp, Sophie (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 26: 677–696. University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering trees. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. 1994. Modification: A syntactic analysis and its consequences. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. 2003. Determining pair-merge. Linguistic Inquiry 34.4: 660–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safir, Ken. 2022. Just Pair-merge: Are adjuncts syntactically defined by operations or representations? Manuscript. Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan, Gazdar, Gerald, Wasow, Thomas, and Weisler., Steven 1985. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 117–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Martin. 2012. A derivational ellipsis approach to A TB-movement. The Linguistic Review 29.3: 397–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzman, Martin. 2015. Deriving mismatches in ATB-movement: Asymmetric extraction + ellipsis. Manuscript. University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1977. Constraints on coordination. Language 53.1: 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, Barry. 2017. “And”: Conjunction reduction redux. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shushurin, Philip. 2022. Adjectival morphology, ezafe and prepositions: Towards a new analysis of linkers. Handout in the Tel Aviv University Syntax Workshop.Google Scholar
Sjoblom, Todd. 1980. Coordination. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sledd, James. 1959. A short introduction to English grammar. Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Co.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stolz, Cornelia, and Urdze, Aina. 2006. On comitatives and related categories: A typological study with special focus on the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y. 1969. Coordination reduction. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Takano, Yuji. 2004. Coordination of verbs and two types of verbal inflection. Linguistic Inquiry 35.1: 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 2008. Functional extension vs. grammaticalization: A typological study of modification markers in Formosan nominals. Language and Linguistics 9.4: 917–966.Google Scholar
te Velde, John. 2005. Deriving coordinate symmetries: A phase-based approach integrating Select, Merge, Copy and Match. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig. 1985. VP and scrambling in the German Mittelfeld. Manuscript, University of Tilburg.Google Scholar
Ting, Jen. To appear. A unified approach to parasitic gap and across-the-board constructions: Evidence based on Mandarin Chinese. Syntax.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Mireille. 1996. Lexical and non-lexical prepositions in French. In DiSciullo, A.-M. (ed.), Configurations. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan and Chun-Ming, Wu. 2012. Conjunctive reduction revisited: Evidence from Mayrinax Atayal and Southern Paiwan. Oceanic Linguistics 51.1: 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oirsouw, Robert. 1987. The syntax of coordination. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Vries, Mark de. 2005. Coordination and syntactic hierarchy. Studia Linguistica 59.1: 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Mark de. 2017. Across‐the‐Board phenomena. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, 20–50. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Weisser, Philipp. 2020. How Germans move their “but”s: A case of prosodic inversion across phrases. In Asatryan, M., Song, Y., and Whitmal, A. (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 50, online. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, Philip Neal. 2002. Category neutrality: A type-logical investigation, PhD diss., The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Whitman, Philip Neal. 2004. Semantics and pragmatics of English verbal dependent coordination. Language 80.3: 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Chris. 1994. Coordination, ATB, and ellipsis. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 37: 291–331.Google Scholar
Wilder, Chris. 1997. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Alexiadou, Artemis and Hall, T. Alan (eds.), Studies on universal grammar and typological variation, 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Chris. 1999. The syntax of coordination. Handout of Linguistic Summer School, Potsdam University.Google Scholar
Wilder, Chris. 2008. Shared constituents and linerarization. In Johnson, Kyle (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, 229–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Alexander. 2015. Arguments in syntax and semantics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1977. Across-the-Board application of rules. Linguistic Inquiry 8.2: 419–423.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1978. Across-the-Board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9.1: 31–43.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. Transformationless grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 12.4: 645–653.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1990. The ATB theory of parasitic gaps. The Linguistic Review 6: 265–279.Google Scholar
Winter, Yoad. 1994. Syncategorematic conjunction and structured meanings. In Simons, M. and Galloway, T. (eds), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 5, 387–404. CLC Publications, Department of Linguistics, Cornell University. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Winter, Yoad. 2001. Flexibility principles in Boolean semantics: The interpretation of coordination, plurality, and scope in natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Danfeng, Wu. 2022. Syntax and prosody of coordination. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. 1960. A model and a hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104: 444–466.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2007. The syntactic derivations of split antecedent relative clause constructions. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 5.1: 19–47.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2008a. Encoding exhaustivity. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 4, 133–143. National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2008b. Repetitive and correlative coordinators as focus particles parasitic on coordinators. SKY Journal of Linguistics 21: 295–342.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2010. Coordination in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2014. Summing quantities of objects at the left edge. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 12.2: 33–58.Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2015. The morphological expression of plurality and pluractionality in Mandarin. Lingua 165: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2022. Could there be other functional elements? Workshop on Foundations of Extended Projections, Tromsø, October 27–28.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1980. Beijing-hua, Guangzhou-hua, Shuiwen-hua he Fuzhou-hua li de DE zi [DE in Beijing, Guangzhou, Shuiwen, and Fuzhou dialects], Fangyan 1980.3: 161–165.Google Scholar
Zoerner, , Ed. 1995. Coordination: The syntax of andP. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Zoerner, , Ed. 1999. One coordinator for all. Linguistic Analysis 29.3/4: 324–341.Google Scholar
Zorzi, Giorgia. 2018. Coordination in Catalan sign language: A syntactic account for conjunction. FEAST 2: 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2005. Some notes on coordination in head-final languages. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005: 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyman, Erik. 2020. In situ mixed wh-coordination and the argument/adjunct distinction. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5.1: 30. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Coordinate Structures
  • Ning Zhang, National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan
  • Online ISBN: 9781009326643
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Coordinate Structures
  • Ning Zhang, National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan
  • Online ISBN: 9781009326643
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Coordinate Structures
  • Ning Zhang, National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan
  • Online ISBN: 9781009326643
Available formats
×